Has Putin Checkmated NATO With His Peace Proposal Again?
How does ZAnon keep getting away with their lies?
There are two versions explaining Putin’s constant offers of peace to Kiev + NATO and his backsliding on Moscow’s demands.
The ZAnon explanation is that this is a clever ruse to get NATO to a) let down its guard b) lose the moral high ground and c) give Putin the justification for continuing the war anyway. The idea is that Putin knows that NATO will reject his peace proposals no matter what, so he’s increasingly offering more and more generous terms because he knows that there is no risk of them accepting these terms. So he is, once again, playing moral 5D judo-chess against his opponents. Ki-yaaah!
Well, at least I think that is the explanation.
I may have actually improved on ZAnon’s version and made it more coherent by accident. But no matter because the narrative is still totally and completely bogus. I can prove that this is simply another bend in the never-ending hoax narrative loop in several ways.
The first is just to point out that these people have been wrong about everything so far multiple times.
They said that the Prigozhin thing, up to and past the mutiny, was an elaborate ruse to get NATO to let down its guard as well. More recently, Magregor predicted that Russia had raised a new army that was bearing down on Kharkov, which would be taken in less than two months time.
This raises a side-question or starts a side-quest depending on how you look at it.
Why do Macgregor and Ritter and the other spook info-shills spread the most absurd maximalist, triumphalist propaganda that they have to know is wrong?
Do they just have total disrespect for their audiences knowing that in two weeks time, the goldfish who give them views and donations will just forget what was being said two weeks ago?
Or, is there some other more sinister agenda at play here?
Case-in-point: Ritter and Macgregor and the others keep claiming that Hamas is defeating Israel in Gaza. They’ve been saying it for almost a year now.
Back in reality though, Hamas (insofar as it even exists independent of Mossad) and the Gazans are getting incinerated by the tens of thousands. They are also being displaced and sectors where their buildings stood are being totally leveled into parking lots by Israeli bulldozers.
How many IDF have died as a result of this one-sided slaughter?
Have there been even 1000 deaths? 500? And has there been any significant pushback from any nation in the axis of resistance? Have Arab countries rushed to arm the Gazans or anything like that? No, there’s been some hemming and hawing, but when the dust settles on this conflict, either half of Gaza or the entirety of Gaza will essentially be gone.
My predictions aside, I think we can all at least agree that this is one of the most horrific and one-sided slaughters in world history. So, why do the same ZAnon people lie to us so brazenly about the situation in Gaza? And, if we can so clearly see that they are lying to us about Hamas supposedly winning against the IDF, doesn’t it ruin their credibility when they say the same about Putin checkmating Kiev and NATO and literally 50k UAF troops being slaughtered at little to no loss by Russia each month?
Yes, obviously, it should.
However, I don’t really have a definitive answer to the question of why they lie so brazenly and so often. I think the simply answer is that they simply can lie because their audience is so dumb or desperate for some good news and because it is so profitable to peddle copium to the masses.
I’m reminded of the famous Mad Men scene, which you should watch right now to understand where I am going with this: