Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Livci's avatar

Tons of basic bitch well meaning pro Russia Westerners assume that if you criticize Moscow in any way that means you accept the moral superiority of global homo. If you distrust Shoigu than you must trust Schaub and be a paid NAFO shill. The point about people being too damn lazy and boomer tier to just be able to mash the translate button on some Russian telegram pages is what annoys me the most personally. Gayzov tier neo-nazis tailor their outreach to Western right wingers. They are dependable allies of the Zog establishment but they are able to obfuscate this by knowing exactly how to appeal to Western dissedents. On the other hand pro Russians in the West apparently dont even know that Russian Patriots who mistrust Moscow exist at all. Of course this might be explainable by Western spooks knowing how to present Ukrainian neo-nazi PR to Western dissidents whereas Russian Patriots have no state backing whatsoever from anyone.

4or5 years ago I was also pretty trusting of the Russian government but if one really is interested in Russia it follows you would research it on your own. Before I could understand any Russian at all I was scouring the internet for 1st hand English language translations from Russian volunteer fighters in Donbass. I would actually use the horrendous internet translations of the time to try and least get a vague idea of what actual Russians thought about current events. Im not trying to fluff myself here, my point is that McGregor, Ritter etc are apparently researchers in their own right but even my amateur self many years ago was making more effort than they are. And if someone is seriously too lazy to just mash the translate button on Telegram than that person is only very superficially pro Russian. They are in fact just more anti globohomo than pro Russian. Thats all fine and perfectly acceptable in itself. Being a patriot/nationalist for your own people first is a good default. But when you are banking on Russia to save you indirectly by destroying NATO than you really, really should look into what your dissident counter parts in Russia have to say.

Anyway as for the war Im tentatively thinking that Bakhmut might end up being a pretty decisive battle in spite of the towns lack of strategic significance. The Ukrainians at resident are saying that Kiev is pulling reserves from Zaporozhye to throw at Bakhmut.

https://t.me/rezident_ua/16708

Apparently Zaluzhny is against it personally but is going along with it publicly. Sirski apparently smells blood and thinks the total bardak and conflict between MoD and Wagner is an opportunity to exploit and they need to hit soon. Imo its a huge gamble on Kievs part but I absolutely wouldn't put it past Shoigu for a second to fu(k over Wagner if they get hit hard by Ukrainian reserves. If a Ukrainian counter attack against Wagner succeeds than Russias best assault troops will be combat ineffective for the foreseeable future. Especially since they are cock blocked from recruiting zeks. No more tying down Ukrainian troops and the initiative at the front will be totally with Kiev. On the other hand if Zaluzhny is right and the counter attack flops than a future big Ukrainian counter offensive will be derailed for awhile.

Of course this is based mostly on the anons at residents analysis but they are considered pretty reliable sources that Russian Patriot channels often site and so far they havent made any bad calls.

Expand full comment
Snackbit's avatar

Just ask the 5d chess retards why russia did lockdowns, vaccinated its population with a 'vaccine' developed with astrazeneca, is close to implementing a CBDC, and hasn't won the war yet. They will flat out deny this and call you a NATO shill.

Expand full comment
72 more comments...

No posts