Contradictions and Corruption

No one wants to hear the truth.

It is baffling to see the strange ideological coalitions that have formed in the West (and East) in support of Ukraine.

Consider the following contradictions:

Ukrainians are probably more intolerant of homosexuality than even the Russians are. This is because there are less people in large cities in Ukraine than in Russia and there seems to be a direct correlation to big city living and homosexual acceptance. In their videos, the Ukrainians shoot at Russian soldiers while calling them “pidori” which is a colorful way of describing homosexuals in both Russia and Ukraine. The translators of these videos substitute the word “pidori” for “orcs” or “them” and “rashists” because they would be banned for using the accurate translation on all Western social media platforms.

And yet, militant Liberals in the West back Ukraine to the hilt.

The Zelensky government has done its best to dismantle any real form of ethnic nationalism in Ukraine in recent years. They have insisted on an ethnos-blind form of civic nationalism where anyone who wants to learn Ukrainian or simply says he does (Zelensky himself is still learning Ukrainian) and who likes Democracy and hates Russia can consider himself a Ukrainian. At their insistence, even groups like Azov, that used to be ethnic-nationalist, have now come out against ethnic nationalism and toe the government line. How any nationalist can support a government where almost every single visible leader of the civilian government is not Ukrainian or even Slavic for that matter, is truly baffling. Even more so when the Kiev government was actively inviting non-White migrants into Ukraine at an alarming rate - mostly from Turkic countries.

And yet, nationalists in the West (mostly from northern Europe) go over to Ukraine to fight for Kiev.

In general, it is hard to understand what exactly a half-ruined, oligarch-run mafia-state offers idealists of any stripe or color in the way of inspiration. The answer, of course, is that money papers over any and all of these glaring inconsistencies. Money is what gets Azov, Antifa and American country boys all into one trench in the Donbass shooting at the Russians. Through the power of money (and technology) a very unnatural state of affairs is allowed to develop. Should the money run out, there would be no justification anymore for all of these different groups biting their tongues and working together.

The only exception to this rule could be Russia’s Ukraine-supporting Liberals. While many of them non-Russians themselves, a sizeable portion are self-loathing Russians. When they hear Ukrainians and Georgians and Turks and Kazakhs openly talking about killing them, they think that these people mean someone else. Identifying as a Ukrainian instead is a very advanced and convoluted psychological defense mechanism akin to burying one’s head in the sand. But, to be fair, there seems to be a direct correlation between getting money from the West and being a Liberal in Russia. We’d have to see the money run out to test our hypothesis.

Until it does though, money allows Azov fighters to wage a war of extermination against the “Finnic-Mongrels of Muscovy” while their own leader is a Finn. To use 3rd Reich imagery while taking money from Israeli oligarchs. Money allows Liberals to suddenly remember that they care about borders. To call Kadyrov’s Muslims (a previously socially-protected group) Fascists and Nazis.

As an aside, even Robert Kennedy, a potential presidential candidate, recently came out to say that his son fought for Ukraine in the Foreign Legion. Why? Who is this supposed to appeal to? Isn’t he supposed to be running against the very system that fomented this war? How can he say that and then go on to talk about being non-interventionist? Does he support the neoliberal war agenda? The bizarro post-modernist Azov Nazis? Gay Imperialism? Why does his son feel strongly enough about it to go over and risk life and limb fighting with the Ukrainians?

So many baffling questions.

As far as Russia is concerned, the world makes a lot more sense when you just divide it into pro-Russians and anti-Russians. Forget ideology, because, clearly, it doesn’t have any explanatory power whatsoever.

Case-in-point: While this may chafe the lib-sovoks in Moscow, there are many Western Nazis that support Russia. There are also a handful of Western Communists that support Russia as well as some Libertarians, and, frankly everything and everyone in between. Christians in particular seem to be pro-Russia, but I do not know whether this is a vocal minority on social media or reflective of general Christian sentiment. I can’t imagine a single pastor in the West preaching a sermon in defense of Russia, unless it is the Orthodox, and even then, there are a lot of White diaspora churches that are very suspicious of the KGB-church, as they see it, in Moscow. Regardless, Russia’s only logical strategy going forward is to simply create more pro-Russians by wisely using state money and providing support for pro-Russian groups/groups with the potential to become pro-Russian around the world.

Moving on to Russia.

Russia has many critical problems that need to be addressed by the government. Whether or not they will, on their own volition, is really the crux of the debate.

As you may know if you are following the news coming out of Russia, tens of thousands of Muslism are throwing their weight around and have been marching around yelling “Allahu Akhbar” in Moscow over the last couple of days.

Funny enough, Tim Kirby, who said on the podcast that he didn’t like “little dick nationalism” because Nationalists in Russia spent their time writing on the internet and don’t kill enough Uzbeks to his liking, recently posted a video of said Muslims and praised them.

The reaction was mixed, to say the least.

How does one square being God’s strongest Trad-Ortho-Bro Russian Patriot with singing the praises of an occupation force of hostile head-choppers in the capital?

(See the previous explanation).

Moving along, how does Russia square the neo-sovok/90’s Liberalism ideology of its ruling elite with the fact that it has to rely on Russian nationalists to fight in the trenches on Donbass? How can we understand the clear divergence of rhetoric between, say, General Surovikin, who sees the war as a Slavic reunification effort, with the Kremlin’s insistence that this is a de-Nazification operation? Wasn’t WWII started for the same reason with the rescue of the Germans in Poland and the reunification with Austria before that figuring prominently as the root precipitating actions of the conflict?

Furthermore, how does Russia get away with saying that they are defenders of Christianity when none of Russia’s oligarchs are Christians, when Russian media is run by non-Christians (and a gay mafia), and when tens of thousands of Muslims are imported into Moscow (and naturalized) by Khan Sobyanin?

Once again, the contradictions can easily be explained by understanding that corruption has a logic of its own. None of this has to be consistent so long as the right people are paid off to keep mum about how little all of it makes sense. In other words, every time you stumble across a glaring contradiction, you also, inadvertently, have actually discovered a corruption conspiracy. Yes, you have discovered a case of money papering over what ought to be a contradiction by creating its own warped logic.

And the peasants need to stop thinking that modern “states” have interests anymore. In Liberal Democracy, national unity is undermined deliberately until there are states within states with their own conflicting and competing agendas. The Oligarchy has its own interests. The various ethno-mafias too. All we, as peasants can hope for, is that we get a strong leader in our corner who is hated by the oligarchy and who needs us as much as we need him.

So, if the war is being fought in a way that is contradictory to Russia’s “state interests”, all we have to do is ask ourselves whose interests within Russia are benefitted by the baffling behavior that we see on display in Donbass. But, if we allow ourselves to ask these questions, we run afoul of the gatekeepers and oftentimes, the very people who supposedly are on our side lash out at us as well.

Here, some commenter on Telegram had this to say about me and my writing:

Rolo Slavskiy sounds like a liberal intellectualist CIA, incel larping as a christian nationalist trying to incite a revolution against the Russian government inside Russia by recruiting and using rightwing nationalist to do it, he sounds more like a Navalni ideologue Christian Zionist - obsessed about racial purity. He comes across as arrogant, full of himself, his arguments do not sound authentic and is very one sided, full of generalizations. The everyone is a fed meme was created by feds. Rolo does the same outing Uzbeks and Jews. Yet does not out the main people who fund nationalism to control the narrative on both sides - Jews. You made a good point about fatherhood being the real test of Patriotism and Nationalism. Rolo can't see the Taiga through the trees, says Russia is losing the war. He does not see the true aim of the war was for BRICS to spur dedollarization in the world and make it multipolar. Fed bankster Janet Yellen admitted Russia succeeded in its goal - sanctions caused dedollarization of over 60% of the world. BRICS over took G7. Meanwhile, Rolo is focused on territorial gains and scorched earth policies. He thinks that is akin to winning. Russia already took Crimea and territory the size of UK. You can tell Rolo is rooting for Ukraine rightwing nationalists to win. Not for a multipolar world. He says he is a 'broke' blogger Ukranian who worked for Channel 1 and got kicked out of Russia and Belarus probably for spreading disinfo - that says it all. He claims to be a Russian patriot and wants to move to Russia because it is his 'land' and 'his people' but he also says he wants to see Russia destroyed and doesn't care if Russia wins or loses!? He says he has Russian 'blood' but he is not able to get citizenship. Its how deep state disinfo redlibs talk.

Since he is mad that I am asking questions, let’s just ask even more questions until we get some answers:

• Why does a Liberal write a book defending Authoritarianism?

• Why does a Christian have an entire section of his blog critiquing Nicene Christianity?

• Why does a Navalny-ist constantly call out Navalny as a CIA spook and a sell-out shill?

• Why does a Zionist critique the you-know-whos?

• Where is the proof that you-know-whos support a positive Russian ethnic identity?

• Why does Rolo write article after article breaking down how stupid and schizophrenic the nationalists in Ukraine are?

• Why does Rolo talk wistfully about Russia reclaiming its national sovereignty if he wants Russia to be destroyed?

Anyways.

Another accusation that gets lobbed at me rather often is that I am a demoralization agent. But, again, it isn’t my fault that the truth stings and that there isn’t much that the peasants can do to affect politics anywhere. This is simply a perennial reality and the reality that we inhabit. You hate me for pointing out that we are in a prison because you would rather not press your body up against the bars to test out your supposed freedom for yourself.

The other accusation I get is that I am a Satanist. Why? Well, because I believe that Russia isn’t winning in this war. And since Russia is more moral than the West, Yahweh ought to grant Russia victory. By saying that Russia isn’t winning, I am denying God’s goodness and his great 5D plan to Sodom and Gomorrah the West as divine punishment for their violation of the moral code.

One can only assume a position of bemused condescension to the peasants who actually think like this. They worship power and power is the ultimate arbiter of their morality and reality. So, if Russia isn’t crushing the puny and weak Ukraine, then it means that their deity does not favor Russia. Believing that things aren’t going well with the war would create a contradiction in their metaphysical worldview, so, they have extreme psychological resistance to considering such a possibility. Not in all cases, mind you. But there is significant overlap here, you have to admit.

In my defense, I am not just a defeatist shill because I do provide potential solutions. The thing about my proposed solutions to, well, anything really happening in any country, is that they’re based on simple, technical, and clinical observations.

It is my view that the only way that any problem ever gets solved is when groups of like-minded people band together to use force or the threat of it to effect change. This is the only mechanism by which change is effected in our world. The powers that be know this, which is why they harass, subvert or outright ban organizations capable of banding together to effect change on society. This problem is everywhere apparent in every single modern society. Modernity is kept in place by a sprawling spook apparatus and technological methods of suppression of dissent. No place is immune. Only the methods, or, more accurately, the extent of repression differ. And yes, Russia is no exception to this.

Here’s what I mean:

Q: How do we solve the Muslim migration problem anywhere?

A: We create organizations that can lobby for/force the government to deport these people.

Objection: But if we do that, we will be stopped by the secret police.

Yep.

Q: How do we solve the problem of oligarchic control of state and natural resources in our countries?

A: We create organizations that can lobby for/force the government to nationalize these industries.

Objection: But if we do that, we will be stopped by the secret police.

Uh-huh.

Always the same obstacle. The same barrier to any concerted effort to address the real problems that our societies face. The spook state are the gatekeepers. They are guarding all the doors. They are holding all the keys.

So, while I applaud the efforts of patriots within Russian society, like the veteran community, the only organized conservative, patriotic movement in Russia, trying their best to take back their country, I am not optimistic about their chances.

Gathering of officers chooses their candidate for the post of President of the RF. Amazing stuff said in this video. I will write about these guys some more soon.

Speaking theoretically here, once civilizational entropy has well and truly set in, the decline has become terminal. Once a society hits a point where the elite is consolidated economically, politically and ideologically, dissent is no longer allowed. Dissent is only ever allowed if it comes from one faction of the elite or another, or, if it is considered unthreatening to the interests of the elite. Dissent does start to build-up during these periods of mismanagement, but the elites deal with this problem by simply devoting even more resources to suppressing dissent. In time, the parasitic nature of a hostile elite and the huge amount of money that they need to spend to paper over glaring contradictions in society have to come from somewhere, and so, key industries and the public purse are siphoned off of and this eventually leads to a death spiral of increased parasitism and increased repression.