Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JD Sauvage's avatar

What do we do with the general officer of the only unit at anything close to paper authorization strength that has also repelled a concerted enemy main effort?

Erm, promote him to theater command and hope he can unfuck theater logistics?

No, arrest him for corruption, obviously.

Wait, what?

Expand full comment
Archangel's avatar

Russia and the USA still have proper generals. Unlike say the UK or France or Germany. Current British, French, and German generals do the paperwork meticulously, stay strictly obedient to the hierarchy and politicians, and remain silent except when prompted to recite some script. But this a recent development. Having read history extensively, the normal behaviour of captains, admirals, colonels, or generals was quite different : they took liberties with orders and funds, they looted and dealt in weapons, they used their ships or troops in private quests for money or glory.

Even in the 1990's, when I served for one year in the French Navy, military ships moved some cargo (gold nuggets, precious wood, macaws) off the books for local strongmen, army units organised brothels, gendarmerie sold unspent ammunition. But the grand clean-up was underway. In the 2000's all these liberties and initiatives were gone.

Russia and the USA still have a general and officer corps that displays initiative. Corruption is an inevitable consequence. A good organisation allows for non-damaging forms of corruption and side initiatives. The British, French, German officers and generals have devolved into cogs. I doubt that cogs can fight and win.

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts