Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Livci's avatar

Lol my very first reaction upon seeing the results so far of the offensive was that Muradov must have replaced Zaluzhny. Unfortunately it’s a very, very safe assumption that MoD is working overtime to sabotage the so far successful defense because that what they get paid to do..by the West. Anyone who follows this blog knows that true. What has unironically shocked me the most is seeing Russias aviation working normally. It’s not just John Deers the crocodiles have been wrecking but they are responsible for a lot of the armor kills so far. Russian troops having reliable air cover is a total novelty for the not war and I’m guessing that really wasn’t expected by Kiev. I’m also assuming that phone calls are being made to turn that off. Strelkovs guess that the Ukrainians are banking on shell hunger to take its toll on the defenders is also believable enough.

Pretty sad that “whoa Russian lines haven’t collapsed yet” is cause for celebration but here we are. Hope it keeps up.

Expand full comment
Brunswickian's avatar

https://vk.com/igoristrelkov?w=wall347260249_678711

Strelkov forecasting protracted stalemate, sounding more like Vietnam every day - more $$ to the arms dealers/manufacturers.

Strelkov says : To date: the auxiliary attacks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine have not led to any results, except for heavy losses. We failed to take Novodonetskoye, in the rest of the sectors - at best, small tactical successes, measured in a few kilometers of the "gray zone" and several hundred meters deep in our forward positions. Near Donetsk - no change. Under Bakhmut - small (and insignificant from all points of view) tactical advances of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. On the main axis, the enemy goes "for broke", stubbornly attacking our positions in order to break through the front. At the moment - after a day of continuous fighting, it is indirectly known about minor penetrations, there are no breakthroughs. And there are big losses. A significant part of them are in minefields in the "gray zone" and from our air strikes there. It suddenly became clear that our aviation was ready for just such a development of events as a massive night attack, it was able to fire guided missiles at night no worse than during the day, and prepared in advance for an enemy attack. Now the "partners" have two options: stop burning their reserves in frontal attacks, crawl back and regroup (in fact, curtail the offensive at the very beginning) or still try - using the significant superiority created in the number of people and line units - to first push through the front , and then try to break through it (as they did last year near Davydov Brod in the Kherson region). I assume that the enemy will not stop the attacks that have been launched, will not change plans on the go, and we will have a long bloody battle. Depending on the success of the enemy, it can last from several days (4-5) to 2-3 weeks. If the enemy manages to achieve at least minimally encouraging successes, he will beat and beat in the hope of a breakthrough. No - attacks will gradually fade as losses increase.....

Our counter-offensive after repulsing the enemy offensive is not to be expected even in the most optimistic scenario - the enemy, even after the defeat, will have a serious superiority in manpower and the number of combined arms formations. Without broad mobilization and the creation of new armies and corps (an additional 300,000 military personnel - at least more or less normally trained, armed and equipped) - the RF Armed Forces will not be able to successfully attack with the strategic goals of defeating the enemy.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts