Discussion about this post

User's avatar
samoan62's avatar

"Censorship and repression works. It simply works."

Finally someone said it. Trying to moralize, win an argument or "own the libs" is so stupid because in the end it's just whoever shouts the loudest and is most willing to use violence. One can only imagine if the FBI targeted the ADL, SPLC, etc. instead of the other way around.

Expand full comment
Neoliberal Feudalism's avatar

This is a piece of good news, thanks for sharing.

It's kind of funny that the intelligence agencies exist to quash the rise of radical populists, but Hitler, who is seen as the arch-version of this type, started out as basically the German version of an FBI employee spying on right-wing orgs: "In July 1919 he was appointed Verbindungsmann (intelligence agent) of an Aufklärungskommando (reconnaissance unit) of the Reichswehr, assigned to influence other soldiers and to infiltrate the German Workers' Party (DAP)."

Also, while it appears quite difficult to organize effectively in this day and age for the reasons you mentioned, I'm not sure what comes first, the chicken (the organizing) or the egg (an increased public understanding of the metaphysical root of the problem, which your blog helps to educate on).

The European blogger Kynosarges has a similar argument where in 2019 he castigated the short-sightedness of right wing populism in Europe and America, which he believes has six major deficiencies:

"1. Right-wing populists have no awareness of the depth of the [societal] problem and the necessity of a massive social transformation.

2. Right-wing populists consider metapolitics irrelevant. They view our plight as strictly a matter of state policy, therefore solvable by the legislative and executive branches (which is understandable given point 1).

3. Right-wing populists do not command parliamentary majorities or sole governments – neither in the past nor in the present, nor likely in the future. They are always in opposition or dependent on coalition partners who are not right-wing populists.

4. The institutional corset of late liberalism narrows the factual scope for political action to such a degree that profound changes are impossible.

5. Right-wing populists offer no grand designs for solutions because they lack a positive alternative framework beyond “liberalism without foreigners” (which is closely linked to points 1 and 2).

6. Right-wing populists are objectively too slow even where they bring about changes. A critical comparison between the development of right-wing populism and demographics during recent decades clearly shows that this approach is impossible solely due to lack of time (ignoring points 1–5)…



[Right wing populists] have no concept of how to actively solve the problems of late modernity or liberalism. They offer no counter-culture that goes beyond reactionary ideas. They become almost apolitical when they merely retreat into their nation-state bunkers (typical for Poland or Slovakia). They lack a dynamic counter-ideal, and they are not at all equipped to propagate such an ideal to the furthest corners of the West (and beyond), as the chief enemy is (still) capable of doing.


The equation of our identity with the liberal state (e.g. the Federal Republic of Germany as the land of the Germans) inevitably leads to disappointments and at best to the realization that this state neither defends nor recognizes our identity, sometimes even destroys it. No Western constitution has a decidedly identitarian foundation, nor is there any trend in that direction. Anyway such a foundation would be incompatible with the self-concept of liberalism (universalism, egalitarianism, individualism) – the left is correct on that point! But right-wing populists believe that liberalism would only need a “right-wing” orientation to solve the problem, thanks to insufficient analysis….



Modernity can only be overcome with the experiences of modernity, not by an utterly impossible return to an earlier or pre-modern era. The profound change that is now necessary is not genuinely political but belongs to the cultural, metapolitical sphere. Such a counter-enlightenment or counter-culture requires – in contrast to the liberalist eclecticism of right-wing populists – a spiritual preparation for a new European myth that binds us to our oldest past and reconciles us with our future. Nothing less than such an attempt at European rebirth is our task and the most promising exit from political modernity."

From: https://news.kynosarges.org/full-speed-into-the-void/

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts