These Latest Battlefield Losses Do Not Inspire Much Confidence
This is what Russia spent 8 years preparing for?
In terms of the actual guns and tanks Slavlands war, there have been several developments since I last wrote about it a few months ago.
First, the grinding self-attrition campaign in the suburbs of Donetsk continues.
The idea is that once the suburbs are cleared, Donetsk won’t be shell-able anymore. In particular, the focus is on Marinka and on Avdievka. But then something would have to be done about Krasnogorevka. And the contact line would have to be pushed further back still.
Even if the suburbs are cleared by end of spring of this year, if they are lucky that is, Donetsk is still within range from, well, everywhere.
I do think an effort will be made because an effort is being made now on both the battlefield and on the propaganda front.
From the battlefield, we have this bit of news. Shoigu is once again throwing waves of cannon fodder into drone-fortified UAF killzones, WWI human wave style. The last Russian attack is probably the bloodiest day in terms of losses since Wagner’s storming of Bakhmut. Here:
Today's attempt by our soldiers to advance in the Novomikhailovka area...
I honestly don’t know how to comment on this, how can you not factor the existence of FPV drones into your plan on January 30, 2024, while being an admiral general drawing a plan of attack? Where is the experience gained from the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ summer counteroffensive attempt?
How can you afford to lose so much equipment in a day, so many people? Complete stupidity and incompetence.
At the moment, the RF Armed Forces DO NOT have any protection against enemy drones; everything they install has long been outdated and does not cover the enemy’s new frequencies. There are only volunteer projects on the way; large factories have failed in small electronic warfare and are sitting with gravy in their pants in front of the minister and the ZMO. The problem requires emergency measures be taken.
p.s Now in the comments the reality of the idiots who claim to have already defeated all of the ukrops will rupture, and they will claim that these are Ципсо [British propaganda] videos, and of course the patriots getting a Kremlin salary will squeal that the video was filmed who knows how long ago and in general you are all lying. Go ahead, assholes.
Again, you can watch all the Russian men and equipment getting blown to bits by Ukrainian drones here if you feel so inclined. The videos of the ill-fated Russian attack across the open against fortified Ukrainian positions is all over Russian Telegram samizdat. It is a smaller repeat of what happened at Ugledar. Chances are, if you are new here and a recent doubter of the ZAnon narrative, you’ve never even heard of the disaster at Ugledar.
And the commentary about the battle that I linked is from a 700k+ Russian Z-patriot channel that isn’t overtly political or even Strelkovite. They actually work together with FSB-approved channels like Rybar. Although, even Rybar allows themselves to critique The Shoigu on occasion. Unlike Strelkov though, they pretend to be baffled and surprised by the decisions of the higher-ups. Strelkov simply took the next step and said that there is nothing to be confused about — they are traitors, pure and simple.
Still, perhaps they will be next, after Strelkov that is, to be arrested and shut down.
One of the main voices calling for the arrest of Strelkov (actually he called for him to be shot dead) and for others like him, is the Kabbalist non-Russia and anti-Russia, Vladimir Shapiro/Soloviev. He recently commented on the video of the shameful Russian combat losses (tossed away like rotten meat by Shoigu and his gangsters) by stating that those who share these videos in Russia and comment on them to critique the Kremlin ought to be arrested.
He said these “bloggers and Telegraphers are traitors” who the FSB ought to drag out of their apartments and throw into cages.
Here is some commentary in response to what the Kremlin’s top propagandist had to say:
Those who tell Russian citizens about the situation on the fronts of the Northern Military District are, in fact, dragging “Russian society into a bullshit agenda.” These are enemies! They just need to be destroyed - Vladimir Solovyov, TV presenter of the state TV channel "Russia 1"
For almost two years now, we have been constantly seeing the consequences of the “sweet lies” that Soloviev constantly advertises (https://t.me/romanov_92/44144) and of which he is the mouthpiece.
Tens of thousands of dead and maimed of our guys, who, according to Solovyov, “had everything they needed [to defend],” but Kherson and the Kharkov region were still surrendered. But society has not been drawn into the “Ципсо (british propagana) agenda”, and the same people are “well seated” in the high offices in various departments of Russia.
[He means that the people that Soloviev is defending haven’t lost their lives because some bloggers have been making fun of them, but tens of thousands of soldiers are dead because the Kremlin pretended that there were no problems on the front.]
Did anyone die because of us sharing the “bitter truth”? But for Solovyov this is a bullshit question to ask, apparently.
We have a different question (to the universe, and not to Solovyov): is the desire to know what is really happening on the fronts of the Northern Military District is an anti-Russian “tsipsochny agenda”, does this mean that, according to the pro-Russian “bosses” of the Northern Military District, there are no problems on the front?
As bad as this battle was though, to me it indicates that the Kremlin is still trying to make some gains.
And let me explain why this is important next. See, recently, the Kremlin has started a clever new spin campaign to justify their pathetic performance so far. Remember how they said that the goal was to “demilitarize and denazify Ukraine”? Well, now they’re tweaking the phrase just a little bit to mean “demilitarized and denazified zones in Ukraine”. Clever, no? Like a kind of political sleight-of-hand and gaslighting artificial Mandela Effect. Or something.
Here:
The demilitarized zone in Ukraine needs to be moved back so that it ensures the safety of peaceful cities from Ukrainian shelling. Vladimir Putin stated this at a meeting with his trusted representatives.
Putin emphasized that the demilitarized zone in Ukraine should be at a distance that would ensure the safety of peaceful cities from shelling.
“We will push back the demilitarized zone in Ukraine,” he said.
Essentially, they are talking about setting up DMZ buffer zones to get some space between the UAF and their long range Western weapons and their fortified positions. They hope to secure the suburbs around Donetsk and some other spots before declaring “mission accomplished” and asking for peace again. Once they have their DMZs, they will probably acquiesce to everything else.
Yes, the goal is to create a “denazified and demilitarized buffer zone” N/S Korea style in Donbass. The line will be pretty much where it is now, giver or take a few suburbs. This is the best case scenario for Moscow.
In actual fact, we should remember that Kiev never really wanted Donbass and that the real reasons for this war have nothing to do with sacred borders or language disputes or anything like that. Poroshenko tried to hand Donbass over to Moscow, remember?
It was Minsk I and II, which was brokered in large part by Medvedchuk and Abramovich from Russia’s side that forced Donbass kicking and screaming back into Ukraine. Of course, then Kiev didn’t even let them vote and participate in the political process of Ukraine like they promised they would do and continued to shell Donbass periodically. Those who spoke up about how unfair Minsk I and II were in Russia or in Donbass were then silenced by the Kremlin, of course. As far as Kiev is concerned, they’d rather just get rid of these pro-Russian areas, consolidate the more “Ukrainian” areas and enjoy uni-party rule for the next twenty years at least. Sure, the rubes believe the propaganda about the sacred borders or whatever, but all it takes is the flip of a propaganda switch to get them to change their tune with a lag of one or two years, so who cares.
All the while, Ukraine was moving to integrate into the EU and NATO, also with popular support.
And now, the EU and NATO thing seem to be done deals at this point. Of course, NATO would prefer that Ukraine stay out of NATO for as long as possible to continue bleeding out the Slavlands without getting involved directly in a war. But when that’s done and its time to consolidate gains, they’ll gladly take Ukraine’s territories under their umbrella to make sure that Moscow never thinks of interfering ever again. And EU membership would further weaken the EU and bring another US client state into the union, so of course America will push to make it happen.
**
Oh, by the way, Russia lost a warship yesterday too. A big one.
How is Kiev able to destroy these targets so easily, you ask. Well, like the planes or the depots or other key equipment, Shoigu seems to just prefer leaving it out in the open. Telegram explodes with fury every time this happens and demands to know why they are left unguarded and sitting ducks for Ukrainian strikes.
The question is always answered with a “OOPS ;p” and a “tee-hee :3” by the Kremlin.
Oh, and then they thunder and bluster about their thin red lines, of course. Usually, a successful Ukrainian strike on a critical Russian military target is followed by a Shoigu missile wave that hits the local ice cream factory and the sick, baby animal zoo next to where Western journalists are staying with their cameras ready in Kiev. Two goals, one missile, see? Three, actually. The strikes 1) push Ukrainians further away from Russia and 2) waste Russian missiles while 3) convincing TV-watching senior citizens in Russia that Shoigu is giving the daggum Nazis a good old thrashing!
Hooah!
You know, the modern war resembles a modern art performance or a fever dream, more than anything else, really. And even after Moscow surrenders, the vast majority of conservative-minded people will insist that Russia won for decades afterwards. The gaslighting will only intensify, I’m betting.
…
Do you, like, get what I’m, like, saying, man?
It’s simulation and simulacra, bro!
It’s hyper-reality, muchacho!
It’s a bear shitting silently in the woods without anyone there to hear him, pal.
All this you must understand.
As I see the present Ukraine/Russia conflict, it appears that it is nothing more than killing Russian and Ukraine soldiers and wearing down each country, so that the same people who did the same thing in two previous world wars can solidify their control over more people/land. War is the best method so far found for making lots of money and gaining more power. It is common knowledge that all the countries that are involved in or supporting this killing/profit adventure are controlled by the same people. The last century was dominated by wars orchestrated by these people in the name of "communism", "socialism", "fascism", "democracy". It makes no difference how people are "propagandized" into supporting "nationalism". All major countries are being destroyed by the chaos and internal conflict caused by the "virus/health mandates", "climate change caused by CO2 BS", "trans/gay....promotion", "forced immigration-destruction of societies", arrest of "racist/radical/terrorist persons who speak out against this obvious situation". There is much evidence to understand this long term agenda for world control by these persons. You will not find this information being taught in schools or presented in media, and anyone wanting to discuss this analysis publicly will meet extreme difficulty and persecution relative to how effective they are in getting this message out. It is my lone hope that enough people are able to become strong enough in their own ability to "question everything" and recognize the truth of what is factual history and what is currently really happening. I read this somewhere: "Those that control the present control the past, those that control the past control the future". If this were not true, why would history be so distorted, omitted and lies repeated forever?
I just want to make it clear. These outcomes are neither good for the Russian people or the Ukrainian people and at extension the Slavic people, native European's, the founding populations of the West and finally I am going to say it the White race at large. They're outcomes that are only good for the money lenders and takers and if you really think the SMO is about sides it's not whatever result we suffer. Apparently there is this sociology game called Werewolf and that is where we are at as humanity.