Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen J. Kennedy's avatar

Something in between a high-level, long-term philosophical discussion and a nuts and bolts tactical review of the war in Ukraine.

Off topic: An essay by Marko Marjanović, Editor of Anti-Empire.com written on a colleagues substack.

Regarding the real danger Russia faces from equivocation by Putin on the ultimate goals of the war in Ukraine, and the failure to mobilize Russian society (no retention of conscripts and no use of conscripts in Ukraine) in what is beginning to look like an existential war against the collective West.

https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/russia-says-its-fighting-the-whole?s=r

Expand full comment
browntsunami's avatar

Thanks for the clarification. I will agree, that, as a generalization, technological advancement has always made the ones not able to adapt obsolete, in some sense, but not completely. The camera did not completely destroy the portrait painter profession. Your discussion of needing someone to take a bullet or pull the trigger, is also prone to being obsolete by exactly the same mechanisms of automation and technical advances.

In terms of depopulation, the military would be better served by unquestioning AI soldiers, so, in a world where large numbers of people are viewed as a problem, the solutions for that problem to a military mind may not be any better for we the masses.

Your point about the elite have always historically been the final arbitrator of life and death is again generally true, however, elitism is not confined to technocratic ones there have been many, if not much more military elites in history. There are a rare few who would not delete large segments of our brothers and sisters, if they became inconvenient.

I find expecting solutions for us from the elites is asking for the final solution. The people have survived not because they were needed to pull triggers or plant crops. They survived because they are diverse entities that put themselves in many niches that allowed them to survive and in time thrive. The diversity of survival techniques among the many makes us as a whole very resilient. Solution of a local nature are more likely to survive the current global elite agenda than hoping for failed elites to come to our rescue.

I know, certainty is not available in any of this, but, since you ran a mind experiment and come to a particular viewpoint. I too, thought to give that a try. I'm unsure which is more correct at this time. However, our differences in approach are probably our best tools for survival. I am certainly not able to buy the politicians or other power for sale businesses to make my vision the only acceptable one, if I did, I would be in the elite club. I would become the problem not the solution.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts