Z-Blogger Assassinated By Bomb in Central St. Petersburg
Where are the spooks when you need them?
Yesterday, Vladlen Tartarsky, a popular and well-known Z-Blogger was assassinated at a gathering of fans and like-minded patriots right in the center of St. Petersburg, literally within eyesight of all those famous monuments and palaces that you associate with the city.
His last livestream
I even know the cafe he hosted the event at too. The food was bad and overpriced, but it didn’t deserve to be blown up!
…
Yeah, I probably shouldn’t joke. But perhaps you will forgive my attempt at levity as you read on and realize why I preemptively tried to cheer you up.
Vladlen was a very well-known and popular war correspondent.
Those are good Telegram numbers.
He fought in Donbass as a separatist militiaman back in the day and then leveraged his celebrity to focus on his own media project since then. As for his views? Well, I’d characterize them as generic pro-Z and nothing too edgy. In other words, he was firmly representative of about 80% of the Z-public in the way he presented his narrative, the words he used and his entire worldview and so on.
This does not mean that he was a sovok, no.
He preferred White Army symbology and promoted Orthodoxy heavily.
His Telegram channel’s avi
He was friendly with the Kremlin and was invited to Putin’s speeches, including the one announcing the annexation of LDNR. He did, however, criticize the Kremlin like pretty much all war-bloggers in Russia do for fighting the war badly and ineffectively. Despite his occasional criticism, he was part of the “optimist” camp.
Here, I ought to explain the two dominant views on the war among the Russian war bloggers. In short, the optimists believe that the war is being fought badly and that the leadership made many mistakes, but that victory is still within Russia’s grasp. For the longest time, I was firmly in this camp. This comes off as strange to the Westerner because they are not aware of any constructive criticisms whatsoever of the Kremlin because they only read people like Lira, Saker, Macgregor, Ritter and other mindless cheerleaders. I am the only English voice that I am aware of providing this perspective. But criticism of the war effort is so mainstream in Russia now that it even gets voiced on the state media by guests with increasing frequency. In the West though, this kind of talk gets interpreted as being pro-NAFO/NATO propaganda, naturally.
Now, the pessimists believe that the war is being fought badly and that the leadership are traitors or that a significant portion of them are - enough to sabotage the war effort anyways. I have come around to this view in recent months myself. And the pessimists did not like Tatarsky because they viewed him as a sell-out and a gatekeeper personality in the same way that we would view media figures like Steven Crowder or Ben Shapiro as ideological gatekeepers keeping the American masses pacified with siren songs of voting harder and convincing Messicans to vote Republican. But this characterization is a bit too harsh because while Tatarsky’s brand of patriotism was indeed the kind that was acceptable to the Kremlin, it was also probably what he more-or-less believed in himself anyways, organically.
Either way, moderating his views and making friends with the Kremlin did not save him.
Here is one version of what happened: a Galician woman and a possible male accomplice showed up at his event. She stood up to ask a question, told him that she was a big fan who had sent him fan mail, and then asked to present him with a statue of himself as a gift that she had made herself. The statue, which had been confiscated at the entrance for potentially being a bomb, was then fetched and given to Tatarsky, who was blown up soon after by the TNT in it, along with many people in the cafe who got caught in the blast.
At the time of this writing, there are conflicting reports about the woman’s whereabouts. Some say that she is in the hospital, but it is unclear why.
To make this matter worse, there’s already a new story making its rounds that this was actually a homegrown terrorist. Some Liberal woman from Moscow and her Libertarian boyfriend who fled the country long before any bomb plot was effected. Some say she’s already out of the country, almost certainly in Estonia.
Who knows. I don’t want to spread disinfo. All I know is that:
they didn’t catch Dugina’s killer and that there were also several culprits fingered in the early hours of that event as well.
there are cameras everywhere in both Moscow and St. Petersburg
either the FSB is criminally incompetent or …
**
Now here is the interesting part where we start speculating about what really went down and why.
So, Tatarsky was friendly with the Kremlin, but also able to criticize the war effort on occasion.
Could it have been in someone’s interests to eliminate this potential source of conflicting information piercing through the Kremlin’s echo chamber?
We know that Moscow and Kiev have not touched one another’s elites. There are no targeted strikes on key decision-makers in Ukraine - politicians, NATO officers, Ukrainian command, spooks and so on are off-limits. And the same detente appears to be in place vis-a-vis Moscow as well.
Could it be that Kiev knows it can kill Z-patriots with impunity so long as they do not touch Moscow’s elites?
We know that most of Moscow’s elites are sweating bullets and want the war to deescalate now that it is clear that Russia is losing. There are also such people in Ukraine and even in the West. A face-saving peace is possible and clearly desired by powerful people on both sides.
Could it be that this was a deliberate escalation to make peace talks harder?
Also, Ukraine considers former Ukrainians fair game and kills them all the time. Russia does not respond in kind, effectively giving Kiev carte blanche to kill pro-Russians in Ukraine.
Case in point: there was yet another assassination bombing in Novorussia today. The former head of the administration in the region, Maksim Zubarev, got hit with a planted car bomb and rushed to the hospital, but is probably already dead.
One thing is for sure: Russia sure does a bad job of taking care of its supporters.
The Kremlin seems to be able to take care of its own though.
These two things are not the same.
Posted this take yesterday so no bully to whoever has seen it but it makes the most sense to me:
𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘈𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘋𝘶𝘨𝘪𝘯, 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥. 𝘔𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘺 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘕𝘰𝘸 𝘝𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘭𝘦𝘯 𝘛𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘴𝘬𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥.
𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘰 𝘋𝘶𝘨𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘛𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘴𝘬𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯? 𝘔𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦𝘭𝘺, 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘋𝘶𝘨𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘛𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘴𝘬𝘺 𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯-𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘳𝘴 (𝘓𝘗𝘙) 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘴. 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘮 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦.
𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦. 𝘐𝘯 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘋𝘶𝘨𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘛𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘴𝘬𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦, 𝘥𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘰𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘗𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦. 𝘞𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘚𝘉 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘭𝘦? 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘴𝘢𝘺, 𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 ...
https://t.me/t_artm/144
That is FSB likely was complicit.
Vladlen was on channel 1 Federal TV with Rybar like every week. The levels of hate Murz and Strelkov directed at Vladlen is one of the few things I have to break ranks with them on. Vladlen was saying 75% of the same stuff they are, its just that they are banned from everything and he wasnt. Vladlen was saying peace talks are treasonous, good will is treasonous, he was saying Ukraine is a terrorist state, he was saying the SMO was a screw up from day 1, he was saying MoD needs to be cleaned out from the top etc.
Murz says Vladlen was just in it for money which might even be true but I gotta object and say so what? Thats the same main criticism he throws at Prigozhin and sure I doubt Murz is totally wrong but can we seriously say Russia would be better off without Prigozhin right now? Vladlen was actually in jail in 2014 in Donbass for money laundering when the war went hot. He was let out to fight which he did honorably enough by all accounts, was re-jailed sometime in 2016 for the original crime, than Zarchencko personally intervened on his behalf and jailed the guy that put Vladlen back in jail. Vladlen came from that shadier side of Donbass culture but unlike Murz I dont think that automatically means he is an outright bad actor. Since Vladlen was also in with Zarchencko and Strelkov hated Zarchencko that explains Strelkovs bad will well enough.
As someone who respects Strelkov, Prigozhin, Murz and Vladlen the mutual hate on the Russian side is pretty painful to witness. I personally also agree with the Strelkov/Murz take that the Russian elite is comprised to the point that victory is not even likely much less assured and Vladlens murder is solid evidence for that doomer thesis. It doesn't prove Vladlen was a gate keeper it proves that being on channel 1 and saying 75% of the same stuff Strelkov says will get you killed. Rybar is probably very strongly considering how much he wants to continue appearing on federal TV.
Vladlen was like Prigozhin one of those nationalize the means of corruption type guys which some Kremlinites can apparently stomach, but only as long as they don't catch any ears too high up the power ladder. Prigozhin is too hard a target for now unlike Vladlen. Murz and Strelkov are on the other hand pure idealist. I am to but would Strelkov and Murz really prefer that none of their suggestions what so ever be on channel 1?
The mind-blowing(* craziness does feel deliberately & cynically ramped up to 11. Ty for keeping your finger firmly on the pulse, and ty for keeping our sense-making machinery reliably supplied with freshest scoops cum sharp-witted takes!
Hereby a radical zoom-out: We sure could do way worse than be of good cheer 🙂 For tomorrow is a fresh day, full of promise—just like it always has been, from times immemorial. Let’s not get lost in details, increasingly gruesome no doubt as they happen to come out.
🗨 It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair.
As in yesteryear, so today ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
(* pun totally intended 🤸