As the showdown with the West draws ever closer, it’s amusing to read the hot takes of the old-time political commentators in Russia. Mostly, they just criticize the West (poorly, even though there is a plethora of material to work with) but they struggle to forward a positive vision of what Russia stands for.
Citizens should strive to improve their own countries. Leaders need to develop social trust so that the citizens know the leaders are on their side not in the side of those that would exploit a country. High levels of civic virtue lead to a well run country with citizens and leaders working together for the general welfare.
Russia has seen the battle between Western ideas and Russian values since Peter the Great. Russia needs to make sure whatever Western values it adopts, that they support the Russian people. Some ideas and values are so destructive that the short term gains lead to ultimate ruin.
America used to be a country with high levels of civic virtue and social trust. It also used to be of 90% European heritage even 50 years ago. The English heritage provided for a common connection. 50 years of mass immigration damaged that. We are now ruled by a non American occupation that hates the American heritage and is destroying the legacy, tearing down monuments, and demonizing the past.
America is likely doomed unless we can have a strongly patriotic president clean house the way Trump promised but refused to do.
I like your many examples about the stupidity of adhering to principles. Principles inject useless emotional debates during policy decisions. IMHO, we should be focusing on what outcomes we want to create first of all, and then debate over what tactics are most effective in getting there, and finally monitor what actually happens to see if the approach worked or not.
CO2 policies are great counterexamples: pointless taxation and squandering of resources that have had no effect on non-existent looming catastrophes, at the expense of public welfare.
The why's behind matters are just pointless expressions of inner feeings, that people enjoy arguing over, but which really are distractions when you're trying to make decisions over concrete issues. I felt, for example, that a case might be made for US police reform, but that you should get pretty specific about exactly problems you're trying to fix. Electronic surveillance with insufficient oversight is one of my own pet peeves, but in the George Floyd case, you could have made a case for investigating training practices. For instance, is use of outside Israeli contractors really a good idea?
But no. Actual reforms were lost in the emoting. The political response was to punish the police by defunding them, with the odd Molotov cocktail tossed in just for punctuation. How the H is such a thoughtless withdrawal of resources and childish acting-out supposed to improve anything?
The West's response to Russia's military operation was similarly dysfunctional: children kicking and screaming on the floor threatening to hold their breaths until they fainted; the face of the West is turning red as we speak. How are those nice blue-and-yellow ribbons helping your cause?
I’m telling u, the white herds need a simple message. The Northern hemisphere for white people. At least it will get them thinking. No one is going to wade thru all this ethnic morass and figure out who is who.
I have people in the comments of my articles saying that my talk of strength and being strong reeks of Nazism. Imagine that. Any positive self-affirming notion or idea is literally Hitler to the white herds. They're not ready for political projects when they're so mired in self-defeating self-abnegation.
I think the first step is to get whites thinking about self-preservation divorced from any complaints about the “other”. Then u introduce the other. The simple and most obvious other is the blacks. Then u introduce muslims asians latinos jews, in ascending levels of complexity, like learning mathematics before you can move forward to algebra. I thinks whites are finally beginning to fear for their survival. That must be nurtured as a positive agenda which is autonomous from any hatred of invaders. Then we address the invaders and overlords. And if whites can’t even muster positive promotion for their own kind then there is nothing anyone can do and we deserve to disappear like any other organism that won’t even promote itself. Then all we’re left with is hatred for our fellow, pathetic whites. I try not to waste my time anymore with whites who won’t listen. They see what’s happening to us, they have no excuse. I’ve concluded that if they don’t even care about their offspring being white then I’m not going to bother illustrating the differences with other races. I still try to tell young people how we didn’t lock our doors in the 70’s, though. I tell them how the Brady Bunch TV show was really how we grew up. I’m seeing some signs of white identity pride again, not a whole lot, though.
Aug 15, 2022·edited Aug 15, 2022Liked by Rurik Skywalker
It's certainly true that politics is badly corruptrd by ideologies that presume to tell us that wonderful things will happen if we follow some particular set of principles. For myself, and I think, like you, I'm more interested in hearing from leaders what actions are proposed and exactly what benefit will accrue. I don't care why, just what and how. A successful record of such achievement will naturally lead to a psychology of strength and power.This pride of course is a two-edged sword, capable of great destruction as well as great achievemment, but it's time we learned to acknowledge and respect both its edges.
You might be interested in a niche, cult-like poliitics proposed by Lyndon LaRouche. At its core is the idea that human creativity should be cultivated and encouraged, so that human potential should reach its highest form LaRouchies favor strong protective tariffs, which I like as well, because that keeps the fruits of productive effort within the country, and gives everyone a sense of common purpose. Without saying so outright (though they do call it the American system), it naturally promotes the same sort of national pride that you discuss. Significantly, it sees international oligarchy and trade as natural enemies of a free society.
I'm more of a sympathizer thaan a follower, and I'm sure like everything else there are warts to be found. But the reason I bring this up is, after I recently watched one of their videos, it struck me how similar Lincoln's struggle against the mercantile British was, to Putin's struggle against the globalist EU. Both had to face attempts by banks to break them financially, and both had to assert the right to maintain national independence.
An attractive aspect about Russia in these times is that it is one of the few nations where respect for one's country and pride in its development are openly embraced. That kind of strength is admirable.
Sad to read this article. Humans have a special kind of consciousness which gives us the possibility to live in a moral fashion, i.e. do unto others, etc., but we are animals. Animals live by "might makes right." And so have we for the last 10,000 years of so. We abnegate our special gifts and create a world full of injustices, atrocities, and corruption.
Your article seems to be saying the "might makes right". This is sad.
I like to believe that to be human is to be humane. And until we can be this way and love everyone unconditionally we will never mend our ways, imho.
Meanwhile, people don't recognize that it is the neo-nazi/eugenicist/narcissistas that are behind it all for the last century and now. Who funded Hitler, the multicorporations and billionaires of the West; the Bushes, Siemens, Bank of England, Federal Reserve and much more (google it). It is their progeny who continue playing the game of world control with the help of the CIA and the likes (https://creativesociety.com/videos/john-perkins-confessions-of-an-economic-hit-man).
This is why, humanity keeps having to relive the same atrocities (war, propaganda, spying, corruption, etc.) and we never come close to creating a just, equitable, and abundant world for all.
One solution to this is to simply think a little out of the box and restructure all government from vertical to horizontal (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wywMhg604W8&t=10s). Please spread this if you agree.
>I like to believe that to be human is to be humane. And until we can be this way and love everyone unconditionally we will never mend our ways, imho.
You can believe whatever you want. There's a whole host of utopia-based religions for the faithful to choose from.
>and we never come close to creating a just, equitable, and abundant world for all.
You will never succeed in building the kingdom of heaven on earth. But you will succeed in drowning millions in their own blood with your efforts to do so, as history has proven.
>i.e. do unto others
Who are these others? Is doing unto groups that wants you dead morally good? Who will remember your virtuousness when your civilization has been chewed up and swallowed? I guess the Chinese historians might make a footnote in their history books about a tribe of people so racked by guilt and utopian idealism that they let themselves be eaten by their enemies. But that's not a legacy I want to leave.
"You can believe whatever you want. There's a whole host of utopia-based religions for the faithful to choose from." I don't believe in attaching to beliefs nor do I believe in religions. I prefer to live by principles that I do believe are worthwhile. But I like to be open for anyone to demonstrate a better understanding (its called an open mind).
"Who are these others? Is doing unto groups that wants you dead morally good? Who will remember your virtuousness when your civilization has been chewed up and swallowed?"
It seems arrogant for anyone to present their opinions as facts as it seems you are doing. It was just the "golden rule" that I was referring to.
I think that it is very important to stop the neo-nazi/eugenicist/narcissists who enjoy playing for control of all humanity. Now, In Ecuador where I live, the president and the assembly are voting today on making vaccine mandates whenever there is a possible "health risk". This to me is tyranny, the idea of a corrupt government being legally able to inject my sovereign body whenever they want with whatever they want. I will do my best to block this as an activist. I have strategies.
This month we will address all the indigenous of Ecuador (their representatives) with John Perkins, "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lv4lTmiymQ) explaining how governments throughout the world are corrupted. And my 7 minute animation explaining horizontal governing which will block the entry points for the CIA operatives: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wywMhg604W8&t=10s). I hope that this becomes the demand in all countries if we wish to rid ourselves of the scourge of the dominators.
I wonder if you might have any real strategies as well? They can just press a button and demolish any huge city. I wouldn't want to have to try to fight those who have trillions of dollars of the latest innovatons in arms, not with violence, that would be suicide.
>I think that it is very important to stop the neo-nazi/eugenicist/narcissists who enjoy playing for control of all humanity.
The people who run the West aren't Nazis, they're Bolsheviks. I understand that older folks like yourself have a warped view of history, but you have access to the internet and the opportunity to educate yourself. You choose to remain mired in the ideological prison of your enemies at this point.
> I wonder if you might have any real strategies as well?
Feel free to read the blog.
>This month we will address all the indigenous of Ecuador (their representatives) with John Perkins, "Confessions of an Economic Hitman"
Ah yes, the Nazis run the World Bank and the IMF even though literally all the presidents of these organizations have been Jews.
Maybe you could point out how you disagree with my contention that it is people with the same mentality as nazi/eugenicists that are the controllers, the very rich and extremely arrogant who have no compunction when it comes to taking lives to maintain their power and wealth. The Jews like any large group have every kind of character from noble to decadent. To generalize about any group that numbers in the millions seems rather absurd, as though they were all the same. They may share the same culture or beliefs to some extent, but that still leaves a huge space for variation. Most Jews are not involved in geopolitics.
Nobody talks about all the gentiles, the Christians who did abhorrent things. Why are not they singled out, Hitler was born Catholic, but no one characterizes him by his birth religion, why only for Jews? Sounds prejudicial.
And by the way, do you believe the video of John Perkins is inaccurate? Maybe it is, after all why doesn't the CIA do away with him? However, it seems quite likely to me, that what he says is true, and if so, a logical remedy would be to restructure all governments to horizontal. Perhaps you could point out how this is not the case.
>To generalize about any group that numbers in the millions seems rather absurd
No it doesn't. It's a useful heuristic.
> Most Jews are not involved in geopolitics
Their elite control the governments of the West, the media, the banks and so on.
>Hitler was born Catholic, but no one characterizes him by his birth religion, why only for Jews? Sounds prejudicial.
The world condemns the German people and continues to pile on guilt on them. Do you deny this? We are in a post-Nuremberg world now and an entire ethnic group was blamed for a fictional crime by the world. The same standards now apply to the Jews.
>And by the way, do you believe the video of John Perkins is inaccurate?
The economic hitman stuff is a very basic, baby-tier redpill. I knew about it when I was 14. He's basically saying that the West doesn't lend billions of dollars out of the goodness of its hearts. Duh.
You need to dig deeper and do more research. At this point, your posts read like a time-capsule from the late 00s - a relic of the Occupy era.
>a logical remedy would be to restructure all governments to horizontal
"The world condemns the German people and continues to pile on guilt on them. Do you deny this? We are in a post-Nuremberg world now and an entire ethnic group was blamed for a fictional crime by the world. The same standards now apply to the Jews." This does not follow logic. My point that no one states the birth religion of others except in the case of Jews. The Germans followed and loved Hitler, though many didn't and had no choice but to follow. None of the Jewish people follow the Rothschilds, et.al, So why condemn all Jews because of a few bad apples? You seem to be following the brainwash of the elites when you make grand generalizations that scapegoat Jews and that are divisive.
Again you refuse to refute the allegations Perkins makes by simply dismissing it and skirting the point that he makes about all or many governments are subverted by this simple barbaric technique of intimidation and murder which goes back thousands of years. It being one big method as to how the dominaters maintain their power.
You seem to more interested in demonstrating how your knowledge is so much more advanced than what I have got to offer, which is combative rather than collaborative, and lacks any substantive proof, which is self defeating. What is your remedy? Nuclear war?
Lol can't believe 10 years ago or even less this was the established view. I for one wouldn't have dared to disagree, or to even think this was questionable.
Now it's just a fossil that cannot be taken seriously, a meme.
The white pill is we have to reckon the gigantic strides forward made from then.
We keep at it at this exponential pace and in ten years the West is retaken.
Is Biden jewish? Who the fuk cares? Religion doesn't mean much any more. I thought that you were so up to date. I have no interest in Biden's cabinet. Is it mahagony? All politicians suck. We need to get rid of them all. Try answering my questions so we might have a mature, civil conversation and maybe learn something. What are you? Are you religious? It doesn't matter what you say. It's about how you treat people, especially people you don't have any use for.
Mm Rolo pay attention that this stuff can get cringey.
I get vibes of getting dragged into the woods by Jack Donovan and his bunch of knuckledragging steroidal loonies, where we sacrifice like a goat at the altar of Strength, then everyone starts screaming and howling to the moon, and inevitably Sodomy begins.
It's kind of where it leads, see not only Jack Donovan, but the Sacred Band of Thebes etc
So the point you're making is that being strong leads to sodomy?
Do you hear yourself?
That is a very warped view of strength.
Literally all of your comments are negative, man. Shit is bleak out there don't get me wrong, but i'm feeling that you gotta make some personal lifestyle changes at this point.
Jul 14, 2022·edited Jul 14, 2022Liked by Rurik Skywalker
On the personal level, I think most of my comments have actually been positive. For example I managed to sneak one in in the surreal exchange you are having with our friend from Equador below.
A few of those comments might have looked bleak and dejected. Maybe I have overlooked that it isn't fair to vent one's own outrage upon strangers but hey, that's one of the perks of Internet anonymity!
One comment was critical because I suspect the idealization of farming is a bit of a cope. Again, we can agree to disagree and sharpen our ideas arguing their pros and cons, all the better.
Also, this could be a cultural misunderstanding. I am not American, so I don't feel I have any obligation to optimism. I'd say I belong to the 'self-deprecating in humour, self-effacing in lifestyle" outlook on things.
So, I hope I am not coming across as adversarial, because I can always a contact in Russia, you never know what the future holds!
Even though, your reporting itself can be discouraging, what with having to realize that Russians at large are not super based and on top of things, but are split between nostalgic useless fantasy ideologies on one side, attraction for globohomo on the other.
Yes, it could be argued that extreme emphasis on the Martial ethos leads to homoeroticity.
The Ancient Greeks are now mostly renown for having been great artists and philosophers, but the main preoccupation of the free citizen of the polis was always war and the preparation for it. It was a life of perpetual weapon sparring and gymnastics. Slaves and the hoi polloi would work. The free citizens would rather train or fight, either for their city or as mercenaries. The constant internal strife, plus their being in demand as mercenaries in the Persian empire favored the eventual Macedonian conquest. All the while they were openly fruity.
Also there is a history of scandals of the same nature throughout the history of the Prussian and later imperial German officer cadre.
So maybe there is a pattern, and an argument can be made that "survival of the fittest" hyper-toughness a la Jack Donovan carries unwanted side effects.
It's all speculation, but there can be a slippery slope with uber-masculinity (from being a bit tougher to total rejection of femininity), as there has been recently when we went from depenalisation of homosexuality, and ended up with tranny hour in schools in a few decades.
To your credit I have given a quick second reading to the article, and you don't really mean 'survival of the fittest' strength. To be sure you never explicitly define "strength", but you clearly imply strong = advantageous to the group/nation.
>So maybe there is a pattern, and an argument can be made that "survival of the fittest" hyper-toughness a la Jack Donovan carries unwanted side effects.
I think the far simpler explanation is that sodomy is a weapon of domination and exploitation that psychos employ to gain leverage over weak people. Just like usury or any other of the deadly sins.
Citizens should strive to improve their own countries. Leaders need to develop social trust so that the citizens know the leaders are on their side not in the side of those that would exploit a country. High levels of civic virtue lead to a well run country with citizens and leaders working together for the general welfare.
Russia has seen the battle between Western ideas and Russian values since Peter the Great. Russia needs to make sure whatever Western values it adopts, that they support the Russian people. Some ideas and values are so destructive that the short term gains lead to ultimate ruin.
America used to be a country with high levels of civic virtue and social trust. It also used to be of 90% European heritage even 50 years ago. The English heritage provided for a common connection. 50 years of mass immigration damaged that. We are now ruled by a non American occupation that hates the American heritage and is destroying the legacy, tearing down monuments, and demonizing the past.
America is likely doomed unless we can have a strongly patriotic president clean house the way Trump promised but refused to do.
"Maybe we should change that"
We definitely must change that.
Our future depends upon it.
"people infected with the ideology of their mortal enemies"
This is the condition of Westmen (people of European descent) in the West today, as well.
We must Go Free of the Meme Pathogens our victimizers have implanted in us.
Say what you will about strength, at least it's an ethos.
Autistic side note, and only because you made the same mistake a couple times: tenets, not tenants.
I like your many examples about the stupidity of adhering to principles. Principles inject useless emotional debates during policy decisions. IMHO, we should be focusing on what outcomes we want to create first of all, and then debate over what tactics are most effective in getting there, and finally monitor what actually happens to see if the approach worked or not.
CO2 policies are great counterexamples: pointless taxation and squandering of resources that have had no effect on non-existent looming catastrophes, at the expense of public welfare.
The why's behind matters are just pointless expressions of inner feeings, that people enjoy arguing over, but which really are distractions when you're trying to make decisions over concrete issues. I felt, for example, that a case might be made for US police reform, but that you should get pretty specific about exactly problems you're trying to fix. Electronic surveillance with insufficient oversight is one of my own pet peeves, but in the George Floyd case, you could have made a case for investigating training practices. For instance, is use of outside Israeli contractors really a good idea?
But no. Actual reforms were lost in the emoting. The political response was to punish the police by defunding them, with the odd Molotov cocktail tossed in just for punctuation. How the H is such a thoughtless withdrawal of resources and childish acting-out supposed to improve anything?
The West's response to Russia's military operation was similarly dysfunctional: children kicking and screaming on the floor threatening to hold their breaths until they fainted; the face of the West is turning red as we speak. How are those nice blue-and-yellow ribbons helping your cause?
I’m telling u, the white herds need a simple message. The Northern hemisphere for white people. At least it will get them thinking. No one is going to wade thru all this ethnic morass and figure out who is who.
That's putting the cart before the horse imho.
I have people in the comments of my articles saying that my talk of strength and being strong reeks of Nazism. Imagine that. Any positive self-affirming notion or idea is literally Hitler to the white herds. They're not ready for political projects when they're so mired in self-defeating self-abnegation.
I think the first step is to get whites thinking about self-preservation divorced from any complaints about the “other”. Then u introduce the other. The simple and most obvious other is the blacks. Then u introduce muslims asians latinos jews, in ascending levels of complexity, like learning mathematics before you can move forward to algebra. I thinks whites are finally beginning to fear for their survival. That must be nurtured as a positive agenda which is autonomous from any hatred of invaders. Then we address the invaders and overlords. And if whites can’t even muster positive promotion for their own kind then there is nothing anyone can do and we deserve to disappear like any other organism that won’t even promote itself. Then all we’re left with is hatred for our fellow, pathetic whites. I try not to waste my time anymore with whites who won’t listen. They see what’s happening to us, they have no excuse. I’ve concluded that if they don’t even care about their offspring being white then I’m not going to bother illustrating the differences with other races. I still try to tell young people how we didn’t lock our doors in the 70’s, though. I tell them how the Brady Bunch TV show was really how we grew up. I’m seeing some signs of white identity pride again, not a whole lot, though.
God damn dude you weren't kidding about people bringing up Uncle H's fun club every time you talk about strength.
It's certainly true that politics is badly corruptrd by ideologies that presume to tell us that wonderful things will happen if we follow some particular set of principles. For myself, and I think, like you, I'm more interested in hearing from leaders what actions are proposed and exactly what benefit will accrue. I don't care why, just what and how. A successful record of such achievement will naturally lead to a psychology of strength and power.This pride of course is a two-edged sword, capable of great destruction as well as great achievemment, but it's time we learned to acknowledge and respect both its edges.
You might be interested in a niche, cult-like poliitics proposed by Lyndon LaRouche. At its core is the idea that human creativity should be cultivated and encouraged, so that human potential should reach its highest form LaRouchies favor strong protective tariffs, which I like as well, because that keeps the fruits of productive effort within the country, and gives everyone a sense of common purpose. Without saying so outright (though they do call it the American system), it naturally promotes the same sort of national pride that you discuss. Significantly, it sees international oligarchy and trade as natural enemies of a free society.
I'm more of a sympathizer thaan a follower, and I'm sure like everything else there are warts to be found. But the reason I bring this up is, after I recently watched one of their videos, it struck me how similar Lincoln's struggle against the mercantile British was, to Putin's struggle against the globalist EU. Both had to face attempts by banks to break them financially, and both had to assert the right to maintain national independence.
An attractive aspect about Russia in these times is that it is one of the few nations where respect for one's country and pride in its development are openly embraced. That kind of strength is admirable.
Sad to read this article. Humans have a special kind of consciousness which gives us the possibility to live in a moral fashion, i.e. do unto others, etc., but we are animals. Animals live by "might makes right." And so have we for the last 10,000 years of so. We abnegate our special gifts and create a world full of injustices, atrocities, and corruption.
Your article seems to be saying the "might makes right". This is sad.
I like to believe that to be human is to be humane. And until we can be this way and love everyone unconditionally we will never mend our ways, imho.
Meanwhile, people don't recognize that it is the neo-nazi/eugenicist/narcissistas that are behind it all for the last century and now. Who funded Hitler, the multicorporations and billionaires of the West; the Bushes, Siemens, Bank of England, Federal Reserve and much more (google it). It is their progeny who continue playing the game of world control with the help of the CIA and the likes (https://creativesociety.com/videos/john-perkins-confessions-of-an-economic-hit-man).
This is why, humanity keeps having to relive the same atrocities (war, propaganda, spying, corruption, etc.) and we never come close to creating a just, equitable, and abundant world for all.
One solution to this is to simply think a little out of the box and restructure all government from vertical to horizontal (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wywMhg604W8&t=10s). Please spread this if you agree.
>I like to believe that to be human is to be humane. And until we can be this way and love everyone unconditionally we will never mend our ways, imho.
You can believe whatever you want. There's a whole host of utopia-based religions for the faithful to choose from.
>and we never come close to creating a just, equitable, and abundant world for all.
You will never succeed in building the kingdom of heaven on earth. But you will succeed in drowning millions in their own blood with your efforts to do so, as history has proven.
>i.e. do unto others
Who are these others? Is doing unto groups that wants you dead morally good? Who will remember your virtuousness when your civilization has been chewed up and swallowed? I guess the Chinese historians might make a footnote in their history books about a tribe of people so racked by guilt and utopian idealism that they let themselves be eaten by their enemies. But that's not a legacy I want to leave.
"You can believe whatever you want. There's a whole host of utopia-based religions for the faithful to choose from." I don't believe in attaching to beliefs nor do I believe in religions. I prefer to live by principles that I do believe are worthwhile. But I like to be open for anyone to demonstrate a better understanding (its called an open mind).
"Who are these others? Is doing unto groups that wants you dead morally good? Who will remember your virtuousness when your civilization has been chewed up and swallowed?"
It seems arrogant for anyone to present their opinions as facts as it seems you are doing. It was just the "golden rule" that I was referring to.
I think that it is very important to stop the neo-nazi/eugenicist/narcissists who enjoy playing for control of all humanity. Now, In Ecuador where I live, the president and the assembly are voting today on making vaccine mandates whenever there is a possible "health risk". This to me is tyranny, the idea of a corrupt government being legally able to inject my sovereign body whenever they want with whatever they want. I will do my best to block this as an activist. I have strategies.
This month we will address all the indigenous of Ecuador (their representatives) with John Perkins, "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lv4lTmiymQ) explaining how governments throughout the world are corrupted. And my 7 minute animation explaining horizontal governing which will block the entry points for the CIA operatives: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wywMhg604W8&t=10s). I hope that this becomes the demand in all countries if we wish to rid ourselves of the scourge of the dominators.
I wonder if you might have any real strategies as well? They can just press a button and demolish any huge city. I wouldn't want to have to try to fight those who have trillions of dollars of the latest innovatons in arms, not with violence, that would be suicide.
>I think that it is very important to stop the neo-nazi/eugenicist/narcissists who enjoy playing for control of all humanity.
The people who run the West aren't Nazis, they're Bolsheviks. I understand that older folks like yourself have a warped view of history, but you have access to the internet and the opportunity to educate yourself. You choose to remain mired in the ideological prison of your enemies at this point.
> I wonder if you might have any real strategies as well?
Feel free to read the blog.
>This month we will address all the indigenous of Ecuador (their representatives) with John Perkins, "Confessions of an Economic Hitman"
Ah yes, the Nazis run the World Bank and the IMF even though literally all the presidents of these organizations have been Jews.
I envy your mental gymnastic ability.
Maybe you could point out how you disagree with my contention that it is people with the same mentality as nazi/eugenicists that are the controllers, the very rich and extremely arrogant who have no compunction when it comes to taking lives to maintain their power and wealth. The Jews like any large group have every kind of character from noble to decadent. To generalize about any group that numbers in the millions seems rather absurd, as though they were all the same. They may share the same culture or beliefs to some extent, but that still leaves a huge space for variation. Most Jews are not involved in geopolitics.
Nobody talks about all the gentiles, the Christians who did abhorrent things. Why are not they singled out, Hitler was born Catholic, but no one characterizes him by his birth religion, why only for Jews? Sounds prejudicial.
And by the way, do you believe the video of John Perkins is inaccurate? Maybe it is, after all why doesn't the CIA do away with him? However, it seems quite likely to me, that what he says is true, and if so, a logical remedy would be to restructure all governments to horizontal. Perhaps you could point out how this is not the case.
>To generalize about any group that numbers in the millions seems rather absurd
No it doesn't. It's a useful heuristic.
> Most Jews are not involved in geopolitics
Their elite control the governments of the West, the media, the banks and so on.
>Hitler was born Catholic, but no one characterizes him by his birth religion, why only for Jews? Sounds prejudicial.
The world condemns the German people and continues to pile on guilt on them. Do you deny this? We are in a post-Nuremberg world now and an entire ethnic group was blamed for a fictional crime by the world. The same standards now apply to the Jews.
>And by the way, do you believe the video of John Perkins is inaccurate?
The economic hitman stuff is a very basic, baby-tier redpill. I knew about it when I was 14. He's basically saying that the West doesn't lend billions of dollars out of the goodness of its hearts. Duh.
You need to dig deeper and do more research. At this point, your posts read like a time-capsule from the late 00s - a relic of the Occupy era.
>a logical remedy would be to restructure all governments to horizontal
Like, power to the people, man!!
"The world condemns the German people and continues to pile on guilt on them. Do you deny this? We are in a post-Nuremberg world now and an entire ethnic group was blamed for a fictional crime by the world. The same standards now apply to the Jews." This does not follow logic. My point that no one states the birth religion of others except in the case of Jews. The Germans followed and loved Hitler, though many didn't and had no choice but to follow. None of the Jewish people follow the Rothschilds, et.al, So why condemn all Jews because of a few bad apples? You seem to be following the brainwash of the elites when you make grand generalizations that scapegoat Jews and that are divisive.
Again you refuse to refute the allegations Perkins makes by simply dismissing it and skirting the point that he makes about all or many governments are subverted by this simple barbaric technique of intimidation and murder which goes back thousands of years. It being one big method as to how the dominaters maintain their power.
You seem to more interested in demonstrating how your knowledge is so much more advanced than what I have got to offer, which is combative rather than collaborative, and lacks any substantive proof, which is self defeating. What is your remedy? Nuclear war?
Lol can't believe 10 years ago or even less this was the established view. I for one wouldn't have dared to disagree, or to even think this was questionable.
Now it's just a fossil that cannot be taken seriously, a meme.
The white pill is we have to reckon the gigantic strides forward made from then.
We keep at it at this exponential pace and in ten years the West is retaken.
In 100 we'll be floating in space.
Can you say how you know that it isn't how they are subverting maybe all governments except Russia, China, Iran, and N. Korea perhaps?
Can you name Biden's cabinet?
Which of them isn't Jewish?
Is Biden jewish? Who the fuk cares? Religion doesn't mean much any more. I thought that you were so up to date. I have no interest in Biden's cabinet. Is it mahagony? All politicians suck. We need to get rid of them all. Try answering my questions so we might have a mature, civil conversation and maybe learn something. What are you? Are you religious? It doesn't matter what you say. It's about how you treat people, especially people you don't have any use for.
Btw, what u young people call boomers are usually 35 years old, so guess again. It ain’t boomers’ fault anymore.
For me its just people born in the USSR, basically.
Thank you! Loving it.
small typo (?):
the action in question is good for Russians and for Russian.
the action in question is good for Russians and for Russia.
Mm Rolo pay attention that this stuff can get cringey.
I get vibes of getting dragged into the woods by Jack Donovan and his bunch of knuckledragging steroidal loonies, where we sacrifice like a goat at the altar of Strength, then everyone starts screaming and howling to the moon, and inevitably Sodomy begins.
It's kind of where it leads, see not only Jack Donovan, but the Sacred Band of Thebes etc
So the point you're making is that being strong leads to sodomy?
Do you hear yourself?
That is a very warped view of strength.
Literally all of your comments are negative, man. Shit is bleak out there don't get me wrong, but i'm feeling that you gotta make some personal lifestyle changes at this point.
On the personal level, I think most of my comments have actually been positive. For example I managed to sneak one in in the surreal exchange you are having with our friend from Equador below.
A few of those comments might have looked bleak and dejected. Maybe I have overlooked that it isn't fair to vent one's own outrage upon strangers but hey, that's one of the perks of Internet anonymity!
One comment was critical because I suspect the idealization of farming is a bit of a cope. Again, we can agree to disagree and sharpen our ideas arguing their pros and cons, all the better.
Also, this could be a cultural misunderstanding. I am not American, so I don't feel I have any obligation to optimism. I'd say I belong to the 'self-deprecating in humour, self-effacing in lifestyle" outlook on things.
So, I hope I am not coming across as adversarial, because I can always a contact in Russia, you never know what the future holds!
Even though, your reporting itself can be discouraging, what with having to realize that Russians at large are not super based and on top of things, but are split between nostalgic useless fantasy ideologies on one side, attraction for globohomo on the other.
The 'strength' problem is mostly semantic. I'd prefer words like "Stoicism", or "Truth through Fearlessness". The lyrics here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHzinY2__hQ
Yes, it could be argued that extreme emphasis on the Martial ethos leads to homoeroticity.
The Ancient Greeks are now mostly renown for having been great artists and philosophers, but the main preoccupation of the free citizen of the polis was always war and the preparation for it. It was a life of perpetual weapon sparring and gymnastics. Slaves and the hoi polloi would work. The free citizens would rather train or fight, either for their city or as mercenaries. The constant internal strife, plus their being in demand as mercenaries in the Persian empire favored the eventual Macedonian conquest. All the while they were openly fruity.
Also there is a history of scandals of the same nature throughout the history of the Prussian and later imperial German officer cadre.
So maybe there is a pattern, and an argument can be made that "survival of the fittest" hyper-toughness a la Jack Donovan carries unwanted side effects.
It's all speculation, but there can be a slippery slope with uber-masculinity (from being a bit tougher to total rejection of femininity), as there has been recently when we went from depenalisation of homosexuality, and ended up with tranny hour in schools in a few decades.
To your credit I have given a quick second reading to the article, and you don't really mean 'survival of the fittest' strength. To be sure you never explicitly define "strength", but you clearly imply strong = advantageous to the group/nation.
>So maybe there is a pattern, and an argument can be made that "survival of the fittest" hyper-toughness a la Jack Donovan carries unwanted side effects.
I think the far simpler explanation is that sodomy is a weapon of domination and exploitation that psychos employ to gain leverage over weak people. Just like usury or any other of the deadly sins.
And u need a simple boogeyman, the blacks. Then u can expand later to arabs latinos asians jews etc.
I googled tatars and all the photos are positive and uplifting, so i figure those must be the bad guys. I cannot tell any of these people apart.