Roll, I read over on The Second-Smartest Guy in the World that in Russia the Sputnik shot is going to be mandated. He reads this as Putin is doing his part to align with the interests of the NWO forces. Taken as a given that these shots are a depopulation instrument, what is happening here? Someone, (maybe it was you, I don’t recall) was saying that Putin was resigned that the NWO was going to win, and he was just trying to chart a course that Russia would be a part of it with some of the “benefits.” I would love to hear what the plan could be, how it could be beneficial to mandate injections that seem to me to be destructive only on your population.
How could that be his direction if he is trying to preserve Russia? Or is he just another minion 3 Card Monte hustler?
Excellent recap of your recent series of posts. Each iteration improves my understanding.
One caveat. When you acknowledge and take seriously the role of massive resource depletion that industrial civilization has done to the planet, it will color your analysis going forward. In brief, depletion of finite energy and other essential raw materials is a problem without a solution, in other words a predicament. If humanity stops using, industrial civilization collapses; if we keep on using, it collapses perhaps more slowly. Because of its large resource base,, Russia may last longer but still succumbs.
You see, I really don't like "system analysis". It's not "all oligarchical forms of government" that have catastrophic effects on the population. It is THIS oligarchy, made up in equal parts of rootless shopkeepers and neomarxist ghouls, that is having a catastrophic effect. It is not because "all oligarchy weakens the host population" that they want eternal war; it is because a substantial chunk of THIS oligarchy is made up of refurbished trotskyists still longing for global revolution. It is absurd to claim that the class that's hijacked our institutions is the same as the Spartan ephorate.
Their oligarchs were all former Imperial army officials, many of whom were from literal Samurai families. There was also no de-nazification of Japan after the war.
So, no, it wasn't the same oligarchical system, really. Also, the fact that the US insisted on forcing Liberalism on them is revealing. Japan faces the same problems as a result on a social level - plummeting birthrates, men dropping out of society, ennui and nihilism and so on.
But you're right that Japan remains 90 something % Japanese because Jews weren't able to force open their borders.
Why were the Jews so successful in constantly subverting us as opposed to the Japanese? Probably because of the Old Testament.
True. And some have started settling among the Chinese and Japanese (in America, at least, not in their home countries) I guess it's all part of hedgeing their bets.
You are like John Wayne’s character in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, Tom Doniphon. He respects Jimmy Stewart’s character, and his idealism about abstract concepts of law as the basis of a civilized society, but he also understands that Lee Marvin’s character doesn’t care about abstract concepts, and never will. Agents of chaos and destruction must be resisted and ultimately destroyed. The details and theory can be worked out later. Your blog is superb - keep going!
Great points but the problem with best practices is that they are very destructive when used for evil goals.
For example one of the highest goals in white countries is the destruction of the families of the masses (definitely not of the ruling class). A strategy of convincing young children that they need to mutilate themselves to be another gender is in full swing complete with a variety of best practices.
Without Orthodoxy white people are morally adrift. I think it was Chesterton who said that when people stop believing in God they believe in everything.
Many whites (especially the managerial class) have now turned everything into a religion with devils, saints and a hunt for heretics.
Now maybe a strong leader will emerge who will put an end to this but given the current culture and mindset of the powerful I would not hold my breath for that to happen in the West.
I just don't see how the Western White countries can have the moral clarity to focus on best practices without some type of return to orthodox (Orthodox or a Catholic back to its roots) Christianity and that probably won't happen
I read somewhere that Simon Bolivar said, in later life, ( paraphrasing) “in History, there are three Great Fools, Jesus Christ, Don Quixote, and Simon Bolivar.”
Most of us lack the courage to do anything but perpetually mull things over. The testimony of those who took on the challenge of dangerous decisive action seems more valuable and different.
I just read about the assassination of Caligula. They knifed him when he was passing through a narrow hallway that his crew of German Mercenary Guards were not able to be alongside him. I think the assassins were then ordered to be executed with the weapons they had used by Claudius, the succeeding emperor, to preserve the order of the state.
I tend to agree on the whole... just one note: following from the Iron Law of Oligarchy, in essence every power structure is an oligarchy. This is true for Democracies, as you argued in the post, but also for Autocracies: this is because the monarch has to rely on a group of enforcers to carry out his will. No matter how small this clique is, they have power over the autocrat because they are his main means of governance.
If they get unhappy for whatever reason - say because the monarch is just and bars them from oppressing the peasants to unbearable levels - the monarch risks to run in a kind of Pretorian guard, Turkish Mameluk retinue, English Magna Charta, or French 'Fronde' situation whereby he is ousted or forced to concede part of his powers. He may then start to devolve into a mostly ceremonial figure.
So oligarchy really is the inevitable outcome of civilization, I rationally can't see a way out of this trapping.
Anyone in position of personal advantage with the current status quo will not willingly forfeit it to boost the wellbeing of the group, if the situation calls for such a sacrifice. And I am talking broadly, not just about people in power but also the like of public servants, corporate white collar employees, anyone who ekes out a decent living from the current system and can distance themselves from the social decay. More so, they will even signal in favour of the current GloboHomo Thing as a way to covertly flaunt their privilege of not having to deal with its often ghastly consequences.
Sure, groups of advisors exist. But ultimate power still resides in one individual. I see this as a balance to the power of oligarchy. It's not ideal, but it's something.
There he states monarch and oligarchy are existential enemies, with the monarch relying on the people as his power cannot really dispossess the have-nots, while the nobles have a lot more to lose when victims of his wrath.
I'll say that in feudal times the common people simply did not exist. The king was first of the nobles. Perhaps Rolo's take is more poignant when related to modern times, with the press then the mass media, industrialization and spread of wealth and bourgeois mores in the general populace. But I think I'll keep my view that even in modern times, the dictator is more like the first of the bureaucrats, and as a privileged person he has more to fear the resentment of the have-nots than a bureaucratic Fronde. Trump was more the case of a sclerotic elite encysted in the bureaucracy that doesn't want to step out of the scene.
Also, consider how centralised states without meaningful regional autonomies or more in general without centrifugal tendencies tend to establish themselves in flat territories, well connected by a river system. Think about how stronger the French Monarchy was with respect to the Spanish one (Spain is a rugged country, France, its northern core at least, is at the end of the great European plain). Russia fits the model of flat river country governed from a strong center. China, same, USA, same. This translates into the inner character of the people, shaped through the centuries to be more or less abiding to their overlords as a function of how flat their country is.
I read that Saddam Hussein was the guy willing to do the ghastly stuff. He rose under a political type who farmed out the unpleasant “how the sausage is made” assignments to Saddam. Finally they were #1 and #2. Saddam was de facto #1 for who knows how long before? That would be the interesting “theoretical” question, I would say. But in any case it was not long before he was “officially” #1 also.
That's what the Turkic Mameluk guards did to local Arab emirs in the same place a thousand years before. Things never change I guess. That's also the flimsy nature of (Arab) Muslim potentates: attractive to the peasants who don't have to pay the crushing taxes they payed under the Byzantines or the Persians, and get to retain their freedom of religion at a small fee. But this leads to a lack of resources for the monarch in order to centralise power, and in the end it results in frequent overthrowals and constant political instability.
The self-Chosen Tribe like the "Realpolitik" for pure power alone. We seek a peaceful and normative society; they wish to butcher, slice and dice evry bit of our "peaceful society"...When that realpolitik was turned on them, they went to every length to exterminate even the memory of that Noble People, and their very justified war. Before we even get to the gate of the Garden of Eden, or especially the Bridge to Valhalla, the Eternal Serpent must be crushed and cut into a thousand pieces- never to resurface again...There is no other way.
Roll, I read over on The Second-Smartest Guy in the World that in Russia the Sputnik shot is going to be mandated. He reads this as Putin is doing his part to align with the interests of the NWO forces. Taken as a given that these shots are a depopulation instrument, what is happening here? Someone, (maybe it was you, I don’t recall) was saying that Putin was resigned that the NWO was going to win, and he was just trying to chart a course that Russia would be a part of it with some of the “benefits.” I would love to hear what the plan could be, how it could be beneficial to mandate injections that seem to me to be destructive only on your population.
How could that be his direction if he is trying to preserve Russia? Or is he just another minion 3 Card Monte hustler?
The short of it is that they will indeed try to mandate mandatory vaxxes because so many of the chinovniks stand a lot to gain.
But, resistance to the vax was successful the first time around.
They're not going to be able to pull it off now because they will face even stiffer resistance.
Excellent recap of your recent series of posts. Each iteration improves my understanding.
One caveat. When you acknowledge and take seriously the role of massive resource depletion that industrial civilization has done to the planet, it will color your analysis going forward. In brief, depletion of finite energy and other essential raw materials is a problem without a solution, in other words a predicament. If humanity stops using, industrial civilization collapses; if we keep on using, it collapses perhaps more slowly. Because of its large resource base,, Russia may last longer but still succumbs.
You see, I really don't like "system analysis". It's not "all oligarchical forms of government" that have catastrophic effects on the population. It is THIS oligarchy, made up in equal parts of rootless shopkeepers and neomarxist ghouls, that is having a catastrophic effect. It is not because "all oligarchy weakens the host population" that they want eternal war; it is because a substantial chunk of THIS oligarchy is made up of refurbished trotskyists still longing for global revolution. It is absurd to claim that the class that's hijacked our institutions is the same as the Spartan ephorate.
It's hard to believe, but evil existed in the world before the Jews came into their own.
That being said, I take your point. Systemic analysis often abstracts what are very obvious and visible source of rancor and discontent in society.
The people who are ruining our countries have names, addresses and so on, they're not abstract concepts.
What is the difference between America and Japan, where the exact same oligarchical system obtains?
Their oligarchs were all former Imperial army officials, many of whom were from literal Samurai families. There was also no de-nazification of Japan after the war.
Check out the documentary Princes of the Yen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5Ac7ap_MAY
So, no, it wasn't the same oligarchical system, really. Also, the fact that the US insisted on forcing Liberalism on them is revealing. Japan faces the same problems as a result on a social level - plummeting birthrates, men dropping out of society, ennui and nihilism and so on.
But you're right that Japan remains 90 something % Japanese because Jews weren't able to force open their borders.
Why were the Jews so successful in constantly subverting us as opposed to the Japanese? Probably because of the Old Testament.
Because Jews look white. They don't look Japanese.
They look white because they settled among us and now share 50% of our dna.
True. And some have started settling among the Chinese and Japanese (in America, at least, not in their home countries) I guess it's all part of hedgeing their bets.
You are like John Wayne’s character in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, Tom Doniphon. He respects Jimmy Stewart’s character, and his idealism about abstract concepts of law as the basis of a civilized society, but he also understands that Lee Marvin’s character doesn’t care about abstract concepts, and never will. Agents of chaos and destruction must be resisted and ultimately destroyed. The details and theory can be worked out later. Your blog is superb - keep going!
Great points but the problem with best practices is that they are very destructive when used for evil goals.
For example one of the highest goals in white countries is the destruction of the families of the masses (definitely not of the ruling class). A strategy of convincing young children that they need to mutilate themselves to be another gender is in full swing complete with a variety of best practices.
Without Orthodoxy white people are morally adrift. I think it was Chesterton who said that when people stop believing in God they believe in everything.
Many whites (especially the managerial class) have now turned everything into a religion with devils, saints and a hunt for heretics.
Now maybe a strong leader will emerge who will put an end to this but given the current culture and mindset of the powerful I would not hold my breath for that to happen in the West.
I just don't see how the Western White countries can have the moral clarity to focus on best practices without some type of return to orthodox (Orthodox or a Catholic back to its roots) Christianity and that probably won't happen
I read somewhere that Simon Bolivar said, in later life, ( paraphrasing) “in History, there are three Great Fools, Jesus Christ, Don Quixote, and Simon Bolivar.”
Most of us lack the courage to do anything but perpetually mull things over. The testimony of those who took on the challenge of dangerous decisive action seems more valuable and different.
I just read about the assassination of Caligula. They knifed him when he was passing through a narrow hallway that his crew of German Mercenary Guards were not able to be alongside him. I think the assassins were then ordered to be executed with the weapons they had used by Claudius, the succeeding emperor, to preserve the order of the state.
Excellent summary of your blog posts up to date. Keep going - your posts are educational and often very funny.
I tend to agree on the whole... just one note: following from the Iron Law of Oligarchy, in essence every power structure is an oligarchy. This is true for Democracies, as you argued in the post, but also for Autocracies: this is because the monarch has to rely on a group of enforcers to carry out his will. No matter how small this clique is, they have power over the autocrat because they are his main means of governance.
If they get unhappy for whatever reason - say because the monarch is just and bars them from oppressing the peasants to unbearable levels - the monarch risks to run in a kind of Pretorian guard, Turkish Mameluk retinue, English Magna Charta, or French 'Fronde' situation whereby he is ousted or forced to concede part of his powers. He may then start to devolve into a mostly ceremonial figure.
So oligarchy really is the inevitable outcome of civilization, I rationally can't see a way out of this trapping.
Anyone in position of personal advantage with the current status quo will not willingly forfeit it to boost the wellbeing of the group, if the situation calls for such a sacrifice. And I am talking broadly, not just about people in power but also the like of public servants, corporate white collar employees, anyone who ekes out a decent living from the current system and can distance themselves from the social decay. More so, they will even signal in favour of the current GloboHomo Thing as a way to covertly flaunt their privilege of not having to deal with its often ghastly consequences.
Sure, groups of advisors exist. But ultimate power still resides in one individual. I see this as a balance to the power of oligarchy. It's not ideal, but it's something.
Rolo addresses the issue I have raised about oligarchy vs autocracy at around the midpart of his first podcast https://roloslavskiy.substack.com/p/red-list-01-the-despotism-of-liberal just stumbled into it by chance.
There he states monarch and oligarchy are existential enemies, with the monarch relying on the people as his power cannot really dispossess the have-nots, while the nobles have a lot more to lose when victims of his wrath.
I'll say that in feudal times the common people simply did not exist. The king was first of the nobles. Perhaps Rolo's take is more poignant when related to modern times, with the press then the mass media, industrialization and spread of wealth and bourgeois mores in the general populace. But I think I'll keep my view that even in modern times, the dictator is more like the first of the bureaucrats, and as a privileged person he has more to fear the resentment of the have-nots than a bureaucratic Fronde. Trump was more the case of a sclerotic elite encysted in the bureaucracy that doesn't want to step out of the scene.
Also, consider how centralised states without meaningful regional autonomies or more in general without centrifugal tendencies tend to establish themselves in flat territories, well connected by a river system. Think about how stronger the French Monarchy was with respect to the Spanish one (Spain is a rugged country, France, its northern core at least, is at the end of the great European plain). Russia fits the model of flat river country governed from a strong center. China, same, USA, same. This translates into the inner character of the people, shaped through the centuries to be more or less abiding to their overlords as a function of how flat their country is.
I read that Saddam Hussein was the guy willing to do the ghastly stuff. He rose under a political type who farmed out the unpleasant “how the sausage is made” assignments to Saddam. Finally they were #1 and #2. Saddam was de facto #1 for who knows how long before? That would be the interesting “theoretical” question, I would say. But in any case it was not long before he was “officially” #1 also.
That's what the Turkic Mameluk guards did to local Arab emirs in the same place a thousand years before. Things never change I guess. That's also the flimsy nature of (Arab) Muslim potentates: attractive to the peasants who don't have to pay the crushing taxes they payed under the Byzantines or the Persians, and get to retain their freedom of religion at a small fee. But this leads to a lack of resources for the monarch in order to centralise power, and in the end it results in frequent overthrowals and constant political instability.
The self-Chosen Tribe like the "Realpolitik" for pure power alone. We seek a peaceful and normative society; they wish to butcher, slice and dice evry bit of our "peaceful society"...When that realpolitik was turned on them, they went to every length to exterminate even the memory of that Noble People, and their very justified war. Before we even get to the gate of the Garden of Eden, or especially the Bridge to Valhalla, the Eternal Serpent must be crushed and cut into a thousand pieces- never to resurface again...There is no other way.
None come to mind. I mean I have a book thats coming out soon.