[Noahidism or Tikkun Olam?, A New Testament For Helots, Hero-Man Apotheosis and Ethnogenesis, The Egregor Named Yahweh, The Power of Ancestor Worship, The Path to the Group Mind and more!]
@Rurik Skywalker are you aware that this podcast cuts off at the 1:00:00 mark mid sentence? Is this just part 1? I was really enjoying the conversation
Thankfully, the Happy Merchants always like to gloat letting us in on their "secrets". Watch the videos below and listen carefully. Then ask yourself ? Why are White countries being flooded with human detritus ? Why have White nations destroyed their prosperous economies through the insanity of the " green movement" ? Why have they demilitarized by sending their weaponry to Ukraine for destruction ? There are many reasons of course, one of the main is to permanently cripple White civilization and to reduce it to turd world status. Guess which "nation" will have a small, homogeneous population. Guess which nation has its claws in multiple spheres of high tech development, guess which nation will benefit from robotics due to their notorious aversion to honest work.
Now you hopefully understand why there is a constant propaganda about needing an unending stream of "workers" from every dirt hole on the planet.
- Migrants not needed: Why BlackRock’s Larry Fink’s belief that ‘xenophobic’ countries will have a higher standard of living amid AI revolution is such a big deal -
'we should all unite to throw the Phoenicians out on their asses...
Your enemy is the same Pharisee class of criminals that Jesus was fighting 2000 years ago. Those running things to their own benefit by turning your mind to mush with their false stories, upside-down definitions, and fear baiting.'
I've read four of Laurent's books since Rurik had him on last time. He is far, far from an apologist for the Chosen Ones, they sure aren't going to be buttering his bread. And he's no coward, that's for sure
I think you can find his articles about it on unz.com, also check the past podcasts with Rurik, not the last one about the 10th century, but I think before that
How do Russians maintain social cohesion without state propaganda?
Brutalsky is posing next to Miss Duck Lips in a food court in Moscow. Duck Lips is next to her mother. Mother also has duck lips. I introduced myself to mother and asked if I can befriend her daughter. “Young man, you cannot afford two generations of lip fillers.”
It’s not all about duck lips! Traditional family relationship between man and woman maintains cohesion in Russian society. In the collage of the photo above that I took at my local Spar grocery store, woman is bagging groceries and lifting heavy bags to place in the shopping cart while the man is just chilling.
When the woman was done with her menial labor, the man whipped out his credit card and paid for the groceries. There is a strict division of roles within family. If the man is a breadwinner, woman bags groceries.
Behind the wealthy couple with traditional gender roles, a poor couple has reverse roles. The man is bagging groceries and his breadwinner wife does not help him and waits when it’s time to pay. Power vertical is not dependant on gender roles but money earning.
On the way to the supermarket, I saw a limping war veteran accompanied by his ravishing girlfriend in tight jeans and dyed hair. The vet is a high earner and his cane is not detrimental to his market value.
Amputees command less respect and desirability but the technology of prosthetics has advanced considerably. Amputees should not be discounted right away. They get lifelong pensions when they’re still relatively young.
In our society, men are expected to pay for everything until they die from exhaustion and women outlive them by eighteen years.
For a man to split bill and going fifty-fifty with a woman is a big no-no that only decadent Europeans do.
That’s why you may see sole Russian female travelers abroad - they have had men pay all their expenses and they have managed to put aside enough money that they earned to travel abroad. These are strong and independent women and great role models to girls.
However, young people have egalitarian outlook on relationships. Young women wear men’s clothes: baggy pants and baggy jackets and sweaters. Because men check out legs and other body parts to decide on the desirable mate, by hiding behind baggy clothes they level the field for everyone. In the photo above can you tell who’s the boy and who’s the girl? This is fair. That said not every woman is equal.
Sexy women are exempt from wearing baggy clothes because they avail themselves to men alpha and wealthy men. This is also fair because the class system cannot be ignored.
Women in baggy clothes are drawn to the phallus-shaped fireplace in a park. Anyone can approach them and strike up a conversion. A man doesn’t have to be wealthy or macho. Just remember no splitting bills please! I hope you learn how social cohesion is in Russia without any propaganda.
" How are you going to “de-Westernize” yourself, Lawrence, if who you “think” you are is so off the mark? You really think the Enlightenment was based purely on humanism and rational thought? I guess that’s what most people think. So you’re just like a normie, duped again and again by a romantic notion of this so-called “Enlightenment” myth.
Wake the hell up, Lawrence, or you will continue to put out confused drivel such as this. Plumb the depths of your own history and you’ll be amazed at what you’ll find: what you will then realize is that, at the very foundation of Western thought, lies The Occult (much of it straight out of Jewish-Lurianic Kabbalah).
Take Newton, for example, one of the greatest scientist of all time (and also one of the greatest Aspies ever, to be sure). But the “father of modern science” actually spent more time trying to figure out the mysteries of alchemy than he did pumping out the “laws” he is famous for:
He invented this story [about the apple] to cover up the true line of occult rationality which he used to arrive at the force of gravity. Newton, when he was old, wanted to disguise his alchemy studies (Isaac Newton: the last sorcerer, by Michael WHITE).
Well, though the quote is good at revealing what Newton tried to conceal, thus duping everyone down to the present age — including you, Lawrence — the author of that biography has the title completely wrong: Newton was definitely not the last Western sorcerer. To prove this, just take a look at the title of this Eric Voegelin essay: “On Hegel: a study in sorcery”.
Voegelin calls Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit — one of the books that most influenced modern Western thought — a “grimoire”, that is, a magical book, full of spells, charms, and occult knowledge. Here is Voegelin:
The principle of construction in the Phaenomenology, however, so simple it will not be unfair to call it a sleight-of-hand. … Since consciousness must be somebody’s consciousness of something, and neither God nor man are admitted somebody or something, the consciousness must be consciousness of itself. …The substance becomes the subject, and the subject the substance, in the process of a consciousness that is immanent to itself. Of course, Hegel does not state his principle of construction baldly as I have done it now, or the enterprise of his grimoire would be self-defeating.
OK, Voegelin’s text is dense but we can see right away that, just like Newton, Hegel was trying to hide what he was doing: his “sleight-of-hand” was covering up his complete devotion to The Occult. Voegelin opened up the door to other studies of Hegel as sorcerer, especially in the fantastic book Hegel and the Hermetic Tradition, by Glenn Alexander Magee (it’s really worth the read!).
Now, is Lawrence even aware of the connection between what Hegel is doing above and what Lawrence himself does in this article? Does Lawrence understand that he, himself, is engaging in the same type of sorcery as Hegel? Or is he completely oblivious to the roots of his own thoughts? Is Lawrence a genius like Newton and Hegel, who is purposefully trying to hide his magic from us, or is Lawrence just an ignoramus, ignorant of the foundations of his own “reasoning”?
Because there is a clear connection between Voegelin’s critique of Hegel and Lawrence’s focus on “changing our minds” in this “De-Westernizing Ourselves” article. Both Lawrence and Hegel emphasize consciousness as the key to transforming reality, and Voegelin’s critique of Hegel could be applied to Lawrence’s article in a similar way.
Just as Hegel reduces reality to consciousness, Lawrence’s call for a “de-Westernization of consciousness” does the same: reality (the West-East division) becomes a mere construct of human thought which could be dissolved through a shift in consciousness — a “sleight-of-mind”, as it were. So Lawrence thinks that if individuals were to “change their minds” and rethink who they are, this mental shift alone would be able to bring about a reconfiguration of reality. You’re a sorcerer, Lawrence, just like Hegel! Except you don’t even know it yet.
What you are falling into, Lawrence, is this: a gnostic trap. Here is another book for you, Les sources occultes de la philosophie moderne (The Occult Sources of Modern Philosophy), by Alain Pascal, who says the following in a podcast:
“The occult sources of modern philosophy are not at all a progress of reason; they are the culmination of the war of the gnoses.” “Idealism was not founded by Descartes; it was founded by an ignored theosophist.” “Idealism is founded on a pseudo-science, that is to say, an esoteric consciousness that does not truly understand matter.” “The occult sources of modern philosophy… represent the overthrow of Christian society.”
To you, Lawrence, the complexity of human existence is reduced to a purely mental or ideological framework. Just like Hegel’s, your own grimoire is nothing but a violent destruction of reality. Like a Hegelian magician, you want to manipulate reality just by using your mind. Good luck with that! Stop simplifying the human condition, Lawrence — and dive into the real history of Western thought, which is a history whose very foundation is rooted in The Occult. "
Another nice one, thank you RS. I'll be interested in your book. Any guidance on accessing the Ancestral Underworld and arousing Arthur etc? It seems like the Neolithic Megalithic religion, as suggested by people like Robin Artisson.
Thank you, comrade Stalker, been waiting for this!
Wesbter Tarpley used to collaborate with LaRouche. He wrote about the Venetian connection with London.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKalqi0O4fM
https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/fidelio_archive/1995/fidv04n02-1995Su/fidv04n02-1995Su_004-venices_war_against_western_civi.pdf
https://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/tarp93c.htm
@Rurik Skywalker are you aware that this podcast cuts off at the 1:00:00 mark mid sentence? Is this just part 1? I was really enjoying the conversation
Yes and yes
Very good, carry on sir.
Thankfully, the Happy Merchants always like to gloat letting us in on their "secrets". Watch the videos below and listen carefully. Then ask yourself ? Why are White countries being flooded with human detritus ? Why have White nations destroyed their prosperous economies through the insanity of the " green movement" ? Why have they demilitarized by sending their weaponry to Ukraine for destruction ? There are many reasons of course, one of the main is to permanently cripple White civilization and to reduce it to turd world status. Guess which "nation" will have a small, homogeneous population. Guess which nation has its claws in multiple spheres of high tech development, guess which nation will benefit from robotics due to their notorious aversion to honest work.
Now you hopefully understand why there is a constant propaganda about needing an unending stream of "workers" from every dirt hole on the planet.
- Migrants not needed: Why BlackRock’s Larry Fink’s belief that ‘xenophobic’ countries will have a higher standard of living amid AI revolution is such a big deal -
https://rmx.news/trending/migrants-not-needed-why-blackrocks-larry-finks-belief-that-xenophobic-countries-will-have-a-higher-standared-of-living-amid-ai-revolution-is-such-a-big-deal/
https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1785042264860848489?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1785042264860848489%7Ctwgr%5Efbea1c23034bf25fd4bc9452331262c6d318f57f%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fsociable.co%2Fgovernment-and-policy%2Fsocial-problems-humans-machines-declining-populations-larry-fink-wef%2F
By what one may regard as a cohen-cidence, Miles Mathis has just published an essay on the Phoenicians:
https://mileswmathis.com/fear2.pdf
'we should all unite to throw the Phoenicians out on their asses...
Your enemy is the same Pharisee class of criminals that Jesus was fighting 2000 years ago. Those running things to their own benefit by turning your mind to mush with their false stories, upside-down definitions, and fear baiting.'
Nice rant.
Laurent should look at the Chabad-lounavitch role in the noahide agenda all around the world and especially in the USA.
Good starting point:
https://fitzinfo.net/2020/07/25/the-noahide-deception/
You're asking for alot. I'm sure he understands who "butters" his bread and is a coward. Or he's happily oblivious to the truth.
I've read four of Laurent's books since Rurik had him on last time. He is far, far from an apologist for the Chosen Ones, they sure aren't going to be buttering his bread. And he's no coward, that's for sure
What does he say about them ?
He says they did the WTC part of 9/11
Please elaborate.
I think you can find his articles about it on unz.com, also check the past podcasts with Rurik, not the last one about the 10th century, but I think before that
Dedicated to those who STILL cant figure out who runs things in the US. Either that, or Happy Merchants arent White. Your choice.
- U.S. Govt to Give 'Minority' Status to Jewish-Owned Businesses, Conferring 'Billions' in Benefits-
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64818
Profile photo for Brutalsky
Brutalsky
·
Follow
Writes about Russia on patreon.com/mishafirerDec 31
How do Russians maintain social cohesion without state propaganda?
Brutalsky is posing next to Miss Duck Lips in a food court in Moscow. Duck Lips is next to her mother. Mother also has duck lips. I introduced myself to mother and asked if I can befriend her daughter. “Young man, you cannot afford two generations of lip fillers.”
It’s not all about duck lips! Traditional family relationship between man and woman maintains cohesion in Russian society. In the collage of the photo above that I took at my local Spar grocery store, woman is bagging groceries and lifting heavy bags to place in the shopping cart while the man is just chilling.
When the woman was done with her menial labor, the man whipped out his credit card and paid for the groceries. There is a strict division of roles within family. If the man is a breadwinner, woman bags groceries.
Behind the wealthy couple with traditional gender roles, a poor couple has reverse roles. The man is bagging groceries and his breadwinner wife does not help him and waits when it’s time to pay. Power vertical is not dependant on gender roles but money earning.
On the way to the supermarket, I saw a limping war veteran accompanied by his ravishing girlfriend in tight jeans and dyed hair. The vet is a high earner and his cane is not detrimental to his market value.
Amputees command less respect and desirability but the technology of prosthetics has advanced considerably. Amputees should not be discounted right away. They get lifelong pensions when they’re still relatively young.
In our society, men are expected to pay for everything until they die from exhaustion and women outlive them by eighteen years.
For a man to split bill and going fifty-fifty with a woman is a big no-no that only decadent Europeans do.
That’s why you may see sole Russian female travelers abroad - they have had men pay all their expenses and they have managed to put aside enough money that they earned to travel abroad. These are strong and independent women and great role models to girls.
However, young people have egalitarian outlook on relationships. Young women wear men’s clothes: baggy pants and baggy jackets and sweaters. Because men check out legs and other body parts to decide on the desirable mate, by hiding behind baggy clothes they level the field for everyone. In the photo above can you tell who’s the boy and who’s the girl? This is fair. That said not every woman is equal.
Sexy women are exempt from wearing baggy clothes because they avail themselves to men alpha and wealthy men. This is also fair because the class system cannot be ignored.
Women in baggy clothes are drawn to the phallus-shaped fireplace in a park. Anyone can approach them and strike up a conversion. A man doesn’t have to be wealthy or macho. Just remember no splitting bills please! I hope you learn how social cohesion is in Russia without any propaganda.
https://phoenicianhunter.substack.com/p/on-air-episode-013?publication_id=1830677&post_id=155997797&r=o786d&triedRedirect=true
" How are you going to “de-Westernize” yourself, Lawrence, if who you “think” you are is so off the mark? You really think the Enlightenment was based purely on humanism and rational thought? I guess that’s what most people think. So you’re just like a normie, duped again and again by a romantic notion of this so-called “Enlightenment” myth.
Wake the hell up, Lawrence, or you will continue to put out confused drivel such as this. Plumb the depths of your own history and you’ll be amazed at what you’ll find: what you will then realize is that, at the very foundation of Western thought, lies The Occult (much of it straight out of Jewish-Lurianic Kabbalah).
Take Newton, for example, one of the greatest scientist of all time (and also one of the greatest Aspies ever, to be sure). But the “father of modern science” actually spent more time trying to figure out the mysteries of alchemy than he did pumping out the “laws” he is famous for:
He invented this story [about the apple] to cover up the true line of occult rationality which he used to arrive at the force of gravity. Newton, when he was old, wanted to disguise his alchemy studies (Isaac Newton: the last sorcerer, by Michael WHITE).
Well, though the quote is good at revealing what Newton tried to conceal, thus duping everyone down to the present age — including you, Lawrence — the author of that biography has the title completely wrong: Newton was definitely not the last Western sorcerer. To prove this, just take a look at the title of this Eric Voegelin essay: “On Hegel: a study in sorcery”.
Voegelin calls Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit — one of the books that most influenced modern Western thought — a “grimoire”, that is, a magical book, full of spells, charms, and occult knowledge. Here is Voegelin:
The principle of construction in the Phaenomenology, however, so simple it will not be unfair to call it a sleight-of-hand. … Since consciousness must be somebody’s consciousness of something, and neither God nor man are admitted somebody or something, the consciousness must be consciousness of itself. …The substance becomes the subject, and the subject the substance, in the process of a consciousness that is immanent to itself. Of course, Hegel does not state his principle of construction baldly as I have done it now, or the enterprise of his grimoire would be self-defeating.
OK, Voegelin’s text is dense but we can see right away that, just like Newton, Hegel was trying to hide what he was doing: his “sleight-of-hand” was covering up his complete devotion to The Occult. Voegelin opened up the door to other studies of Hegel as sorcerer, especially in the fantastic book Hegel and the Hermetic Tradition, by Glenn Alexander Magee (it’s really worth the read!).
Now, is Lawrence even aware of the connection between what Hegel is doing above and what Lawrence himself does in this article? Does Lawrence understand that he, himself, is engaging in the same type of sorcery as Hegel? Or is he completely oblivious to the roots of his own thoughts? Is Lawrence a genius like Newton and Hegel, who is purposefully trying to hide his magic from us, or is Lawrence just an ignoramus, ignorant of the foundations of his own “reasoning”?
Because there is a clear connection between Voegelin’s critique of Hegel and Lawrence’s focus on “changing our minds” in this “De-Westernizing Ourselves” article. Both Lawrence and Hegel emphasize consciousness as the key to transforming reality, and Voegelin’s critique of Hegel could be applied to Lawrence’s article in a similar way.
Just as Hegel reduces reality to consciousness, Lawrence’s call for a “de-Westernization of consciousness” does the same: reality (the West-East division) becomes a mere construct of human thought which could be dissolved through a shift in consciousness — a “sleight-of-mind”, as it were. So Lawrence thinks that if individuals were to “change their minds” and rethink who they are, this mental shift alone would be able to bring about a reconfiguration of reality. You’re a sorcerer, Lawrence, just like Hegel! Except you don’t even know it yet.
What you are falling into, Lawrence, is this: a gnostic trap. Here is another book for you, Les sources occultes de la philosophie moderne (The Occult Sources of Modern Philosophy), by Alain Pascal, who says the following in a podcast:
“The occult sources of modern philosophy are not at all a progress of reason; they are the culmination of the war of the gnoses.” “Idealism was not founded by Descartes; it was founded by an ignored theosophist.” “Idealism is founded on a pseudo-science, that is to say, an esoteric consciousness that does not truly understand matter.” “The occult sources of modern philosophy… represent the overthrow of Christian society.”
To you, Lawrence, the complexity of human existence is reduced to a purely mental or ideological framework. Just like Hegel’s, your own grimoire is nothing but a violent destruction of reality. Like a Hegelian magician, you want to manipulate reality just by using your mind. Good luck with that! Stop simplifying the human condition, Lawrence — and dive into the real history of Western thought, which is a history whose very foundation is rooted in The Occult. "
I thought the "great migration" to RedNote would backfire on the US gov. , however, it might the Chinese who dont know what they're in for.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/cultural-invasion-with-gain-of-function
Oh yeah, perfect timing!
Another nice one, thank you RS. I'll be interested in your book. Any guidance on accessing the Ancestral Underworld and arousing Arthur etc? It seems like the Neolithic Megalithic religion, as suggested by people like Robin Artisson.
Read this:
The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name