Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sim1776's avatar

A reshuffling of command is fairly typical once the bullets start flying. No plan survives contact with enemy and the current command has been almost incompetently timid from Day 1. I'm surprised that it didnt happen sooner. The Kiev hopium attack and the failure around Kharkov(sp?) should have shown that spmeone wasn't thinking too strategically. I cannot harp enough about supply lines and concentrating fronts.

I do feel that this Ukrainian offensive is the best the Ukies will be able to manage without direct NATO involvement beyond "observers." The Russians will lose some ground, consolidate lines, and settle in until General Winter makes his appearance. This will hopefully allow time to bring in the hounds. The Russians will be able to return the favor of exploiting lines this winter with fresh troops. My prayers are for the civilians trapped in the back and forth.

President Putin's speech was something else. Mentioning inversion and the Satanic corruption in the West was huge. Hell he even called out the surveillance state and referenced an alien occupying government. Speeches like that lay out a stark contrast of motivational goals. Americans get to fight for the "right" to mutilate children's genitals and men to bugger boys while Russia will fight for family and culture: the Good, the Beautiful, and the True.

I'm cool with some paid content. Fed bucks and censorious pay processors are so much easier for this lazy American.

Expand full comment
Fedorov's avatar

Putin's recent speech was bitter sweet. We finally have some real anti-western rhetoric but in the end I couldn't feel like it was anything but preaching to the choir. It's actually surreal when you think about it, especially given Kremlin was smart enough to know what needed to be said but do they believe it themselves? The rhetoric does a 180 from 10 years ago yet Russia continues to steam along as a mirror image in some ways of the west, like say as far as culture is concerned.

So the only explanation we have for the war performance is that the MoD is incompetent, bureaucracy is strangling the war effort and the army is underequipped. While there are many patriots engaging in the conflict and while there are certain arms manufacturing sectors who seem to be picking up the slack - the current situation looks like at best the Russians will stumble to victory on the backs of the bravery of the servicemen. I hate to do the traditional eastern Europe liberal rhetorical argument but we have to ask ourselves; would you survive against the Americans in a trench? Would Americans ground their aviation because of a manpad? Do Americans play ball with their adversary? Do Americans seize fire so the enemy can collect the dead? Does Germany and Japan hate America because their cities were firebombed? Does the US army operate without a gigantic intelligence and strategic planning apparatus that's constantly on the offensive?

I'm afraid the problem is too large to be solved by new generals. How can you expect a general to win a modern war with artillery? The sad part about it is I think they all knew. After all why make a spectacle of these precision missiles? Who starts a war with a primary goal of scaring the enemy? What good is a resentful scared opponent left to their own devices?

The only hope now are the people, the Russian people.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts