35 Comments
User's avatar
Sim1776's avatar

A reshuffling of command is fairly typical once the bullets start flying. No plan survives contact with enemy and the current command has been almost incompetently timid from Day 1. I'm surprised that it didnt happen sooner. The Kiev hopium attack and the failure around Kharkov(sp?) should have shown that spmeone wasn't thinking too strategically. I cannot harp enough about supply lines and concentrating fronts.

I do feel that this Ukrainian offensive is the best the Ukies will be able to manage without direct NATO involvement beyond "observers." The Russians will lose some ground, consolidate lines, and settle in until General Winter makes his appearance. This will hopefully allow time to bring in the hounds. The Russians will be able to return the favor of exploiting lines this winter with fresh troops. My prayers are for the civilians trapped in the back and forth.

President Putin's speech was something else. Mentioning inversion and the Satanic corruption in the West was huge. Hell he even called out the surveillance state and referenced an alien occupying government. Speeches like that lay out a stark contrast of motivational goals. Americans get to fight for the "right" to mutilate children's genitals and men to bugger boys while Russia will fight for family and culture: the Good, the Beautiful, and the True.

I'm cool with some paid content. Fed bucks and censorious pay processors are so much easier for this lazy American.

Expand full comment
paul scott's avatar

Yes. I think NATO is a lot more than an observer.. they are in there if not boots and all. They are in control of these HIMARS and may even be remotely controlling much of the missile attacks. This is the Third world war and it will spill into Crimea and likely elsewhere. Specialised Nuclear missiles are possible even likely.

Expand full comment
Fedorov's avatar

Putin's recent speech was bitter sweet. We finally have some real anti-western rhetoric but in the end I couldn't feel like it was anything but preaching to the choir. It's actually surreal when you think about it, especially given Kremlin was smart enough to know what needed to be said but do they believe it themselves? The rhetoric does a 180 from 10 years ago yet Russia continues to steam along as a mirror image in some ways of the west, like say as far as culture is concerned.

So the only explanation we have for the war performance is that the MoD is incompetent, bureaucracy is strangling the war effort and the army is underequipped. While there are many patriots engaging in the conflict and while there are certain arms manufacturing sectors who seem to be picking up the slack - the current situation looks like at best the Russians will stumble to victory on the backs of the bravery of the servicemen. I hate to do the traditional eastern Europe liberal rhetorical argument but we have to ask ourselves; would you survive against the Americans in a trench? Would Americans ground their aviation because of a manpad? Do Americans play ball with their adversary? Do Americans seize fire so the enemy can collect the dead? Does Germany and Japan hate America because their cities were firebombed? Does the US army operate without a gigantic intelligence and strategic planning apparatus that's constantly on the offensive?

I'm afraid the problem is too large to be solved by new generals. How can you expect a general to win a modern war with artillery? The sad part about it is I think they all knew. After all why make a spectacle of these precision missiles? Who starts a war with a primary goal of scaring the enemy? What good is a resentful scared opponent left to their own devices?

The only hope now are the people, the Russian people.

Expand full comment
Kathy Sloan's avatar

I know this will be covered on tomorrow's podcast but I must comment on Putin's speech, the most brilliant he has given since he first became president. My favorite parts were: "The West is ready to cross every line to preserve the neocolonial system which allows it to live off the world, to plunder it thanks to the domination of the dollar and technology, to collect an actual tribute from humanity to extract its primary source of unearned prosperity, the rent paid to the hegemon. It is critically important to them to force all countries to surrender their sovereignty to the United States.

In certain countries, the ruling elite voluntarily agree to do this, voluntarily agree to become vassals; others are bribed or intimidated. And if this does not work, they destroy entire countries, leaving behind humanitarian disasters, devastation, ruins, millions of wrecked and mangled human lives, terrorist enclaves, social disaster zones, protectorates, colonies and semi-colonies. They don’t care. All they care about is their own benefit. " Say it, Mr. President, say it!

Expand full comment
Larry Cox's avatar

I see this, too. And the pattern has been reported to me from sources I trust. But do you know why this is being done? What drives the forces that Putin labels as the "U.S." to such extreme levels of authoritarian threats? I have been supplied with some answers from my best sources, but I wonder what others think is going on.

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

I just returned from a seminar on RUSSIA at Hillsdale College. Professor Sean McKeekin of Bard College singled out Victoria Nuland as the prime mover behind the aggressive support of the fascist government of Ukraine and the violent overthrow of Russia.

Bear in mind that Hillsdale is the center of conservative thought in the USA and everyone I spoke with was against the United States' participation (and role as cheerleader) in the Ukraine War.

Expand full comment
Rurik Skywalker's avatar

Ethnic grievance.

Expand full comment
Larry Cox's avatar

Well, this might help to explain, but it uses too few words for me to duplicate your meaning. What I know is that different ethnic groups get along all over the world, unless a troublemaker comes in and stirs up animosities. This is the basic mechanism I feel is at work. Outside agitators, basically. Of course, the ethnic argument, such a was used to turn many Germans into Jew haters, can be a potent one.

Expand full comment
Rurik Skywalker's avatar

Maybe the Germans had a good reason?

Expand full comment
Larry Cox's avatar

I'm sure there were a few Jews being bad, but the whole Jewish race? Their propaganda led to outright slaughter of women and children, to say nothing of able-bodied men.

Expand full comment
Frantic's avatar

I think this guy Lapin made the best with what troops he had. It's sensible to retire if overrun. And neither is to blame the one who was responsible for the allocation of troops to the various fronts.

Makes sense, in fact, to keep most divisions in the main central Donbass front because shifting troops to the Kharkov region Oskil line would invite the AFU to attack and regain heavily fortified positions Russia fought hard to conquer, like Popasnaya, and that would really invalidate all progress made during the SMO.

Also Kherson, the Estuary region is nice to have as a layer of protection for the Crimea. So it has to be Kharkov that gives.

When all is said and done, there remains the surprise for how good the Ukrainians have been at hiding their power level when they were being pummelled up to a month ago. I remember Zelenskyyy broadcasting a message "We will be back" around the time when Lisichansk was occupied.

https://www.kyivpost.com/russias-war/zelensky-we-will-take-back-lysychansk-ukraine-will-be-free.html

He was mostly laughed at as a deluded moron useful to dupe Western audiences with nonsense while the Russian army was having a field day. It's really humbling and sobering to notice that he is backing it all up. One is tempted to take him seriously from now on.

Expand full comment
Stephen J. Kennedy's avatar

Haven't used crypto yet. So, I would be doing this just for you (well, maybe for me later). So, I've been dragging my feet. It's gotten to the point in the US, that people have some concern about becoming a dissident, like even reading this. Would never imagine I would write this. I copy links to your articles on some of the less rabid Russia fanboy websites as an antidote. Some people are not pleased.

Expand full comment
CR's avatar

I copy links to your articles on some of the less rabid Russia fanboy websites as an antidote. Some people are not pleased.>

I’m curious...Which sites are people not pleased with Rolo’s articles? Is it the readers or the bloggers who aren’t pleased?

Expand full comment
paul scott's avatar

Yes me also. I am preared to learn about Crypto just so I can contribute here . Your friends who watch TV are years and years behind reality and may never catch up to you. The American debt financed economy is showing primary signs of collapse. The FED is artificialy holding up the dollar for now, it can't last . A New World reserve currency is on the books now, you are alive in times when your Country is dying from its mis greatment of all humanity. The depression will hit within two years . Hold property like your home if you have one, , $US is in full flight for now, but Inflation will go nuts this year. and next year. When businesses and householders fall over then the Banksters will print money again

Expand full comment
CR's avatar

I’ve been reading your Substack since the very beginning. I half expected to lose interest in your writing because as time went I would surely disagree with you on too many topics to continue to value what you have to say.

Alas, that has not happened. The more you write the more I want to read. So, I’ll pay to read...

Oh and still waiting for your book to be published, I’d read that too.

Expand full comment
Rurik Skywalker's avatar

Jeez man, I'm blushing.

Expand full comment
CR's avatar

Lol...just being honest

Expand full comment
paul scott's avatar

Well yes you are getting big interest >its because you re not slavishly partisan, and hard hitting.

Expand full comment
Unsure's avatar

Not a military specialist here but I do enjoy reading authentic voices and hearing alternative views, and you have both especially considering your proximity to the action (as it were). Paid content is a pretty standard approach on these blogs and you've provided consistently good content so I would say go for it.

Expand full comment
RegretLeft's avatar

I'm in on "a paid section" - if I can avert a showdown with bitcoin. I have plans - but I just can't get over the hump - other boomers do it, why not me!? (Binance wants my SSN, for one - a surprise and a hurdle).

Expand full comment
Archangel's avatar

Crypto currencies consist of a series of public transactions between perfectly anonymous numbered addresses. The way to track what someone does is by obliging everyone who wants to add or withdraw fiat currency to provide enough information to identify him or her beyond reasonable doubt. The governments have coerced all these entry points to do that by blocking internet access or by freezing financial transactions on the companies managing them, everywhere in the world. No way out of the surveillance state. Note that this is official surveillance that can be used against you in the open unlike the surveillance of the secret services.

If someone wants to track Rolo's donors, they identify his accounts then his numbered addresses and the currencies on them, go back on the chain, identify the sending addresses and the accounts associated with them. It is merely more complicated than snooping on credit card transactions but no effective source of anonymity.

Cash is the only source of anonymity and the credit cards that you can buy with cash in some countries.

Expand full comment
Rurik Skywalker's avatar

Monero solves that problem.

But, getting people into crypto in general is a necessary first step.

Also, no one has gotten in trouble for donating to bloggers yet.

Expand full comment
Timothy Williams's avatar

Rolo, Saker is down due to hurricane, and MoA is just down. These sources have problems as you have articulated, but at least they host free comment. Do you recommend any other web-based sources for SMO information?

Expand full comment
Rurik Skywalker's avatar

No, not really. Too much disinfo.

Expand full comment
Timothy Williams's avatar

Thanks for confirming. I have been finding the same:

Expand full comment
Andrew's avatar

I'm looking forward to this podcast. I found an English transcript of the speech on the Kremlin official site. It was a real barn burner.

Expand full comment
David Parker's avatar

"In August, indications suggested that the Russians had planned to leave the area well before the start of the Ukrainian offensive. They therefore withdrew in good order, together with some civilians who could have been the subject of retaliation. As evidence of this, the huge ammunition depot at Balaklaya was empty when the Ukrainians found it, demonstrating that the Russians had evacuated all sensitive personnel and equipment in good order several days earlier. The Russians had even left areas that Ukraine had not attacked. Only a few Russian National Guard and Donbass militia troops remained as the Ukrainians entered the area."

The Ukrops did not get any free ammo. There must have been something wrong with the tank.

Also this:

"Rybar in English

@rybar_en

·

19 h

Răspuns către

@rybar_en

1. No unit rotation. Units of the 126th Brigade have been fighting since March. Soldiers would go on leave for five days at best. Seven months on the front line without rotation. Constant battles, wounds, experienced and seasoned men were bombarded for seven months in a row.

End of August, these same guys knocked out the AFU’s 128th Transcarpathian brigade so badly that they declared mourning. Our men were left at their positions. The Ukrainians rotated out the 128th, brought in additional tank units and a month later knocked us out of our positions.

Rybar in English

@rybar_en

·

19 h

Miracles do not happen, no matter how heroic our soldiers may be, if the village is defended by 15 people, and the enemy hammers them with attacks and artillery fire for seven months in a row, sooner or later the unit will lose combat effectiveness.

2. Judging by the nature of the losses, the enemy used a tactic of wedging themselves between our strongpoints. Wildly short on infantry, ours sat at the strongholds, i.e. in the villages and plantations.

After months of reconnaissance, the enemy found places to infiltrate between the strongholds. Then came the insertion of mobile units into the gaps that were wedged open.

Our troops were severely strained, the strongpoints held, but the mobile reserves needed to stop the breakthroughs either did not exist, or were insufficient.

The strongholds would stay intact, but instantly, in the first few hours, would find themselves surrounded, fight until they ran out of ammunition and break out under fire.

By the way, the Ukrainians would have so little strength that they weren't even really trying to catch the encircled men, most of them made it back to us.

Weather was bad, neither side used artillery. So it's logical to suppose if we had some BTGs equipped with heavy copters, capable of seeing several kms, the breakthrough would have been stopped. But I have no info that the tankers fought to the last man, please excuse me if so.

3. Guys from the field report en masse that our tactical insignia, i.e. Z and V, was applied to enemy equipment, causing confusion in the first hours of the battle as the front collapsed.

If this is true, it means the enemy has an American network-centric battle management system, where all units on the battlefield are net-linked and marked on computers, even at company level, let alone at battalion-regiment level.

Thus, even a company sergeant in a Humvee, BMP, or T-64 can see on the screen where his own are and where the others are, and he doesn't care what marks are on the armor.

If this is case, then that's very bad news, since that's a qualitatively new level of troop control, and our retreat would be a consequence of losing parity."

Expand full comment
Glenda's avatar

Some of us haven't received much of a share of booty from all the enterprises of our Western 'Satanic' entity. We have to buy bird seed for our pets and beans to feed our families. News commentators are low on our 'hierarchy of needs'; so if you put in a paid section, I hope you profit from it, and will miss reading what you have to say.

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

Revenge for the assassination of Darina Dugina has not yet been evident. Now that Russia has been invaded, it is likely that Kiev will be destroyed in the middle of winter.

Expand full comment
paul scott's avatar

Yes ok good. Great reverence offered. . You are giving us no nonsense accounts. It was reaaly weird that the front line was so sparse in Russian troops.

Expand full comment
Larry Cox's avatar

I have been told via Mike Adams articles and podcasts that Russia could hold or even conquer Ukraine fairly easily if that were its actual goal. That its armaments and troop numbers are far in excess of what Ukraine has on the ground. But that Russia is not deploying anywhere near the numbers and quality of fighting forces in Ukraine that it could.

I have no independent way of evaluating statements like this. Do you? My impression is that it's propaganda all the way down, with true facts remaining totally hidden.

The only countervailing stories I have found from Ukraine come from Patrick Lancaster's videos, and all he picks up is the impressions from civilians and solders who are on the Russian side of the front. Many of them blame the Ukrainians for most of the civilitan casualties, as does Russia. Though this tends to balance out the West's hytserical stories of wanton carnage, I don't know that it is really that helpful.

Almost no one in the West except a politican from Ireland (and they should know!) and perhaps a few others are actually demanding peace talks. And neither is Russia, it seems. So my impression is that Russia is perfectly willing to waste men and equipment to accomplish the impoverishment of the West. If I were a Russian, I might be sympathetic to this goal, though wouldn't raising the level of the entire planet be better?

Expand full comment
Cruelnunusual's avatar

I think the Russians are about to take it to them. I hope.

Expand full comment