So.
Christian morality.
It’s important, wouldn’t you agree?
The people who have the most beef with Christianity are the ones who chafe the most against the moral code of Christianity. In particular, the sexual prohibitions. Of course, most of us violate the Christian moral code because we engage in premarital sex, among other things. And control of sex is, basically, what morality boils down to. The rest is just window-dressing.
Just think about the great moral debates that we’ve had in the West in the last decades. None of them have been about the morality of re-instituting dueling culture. The crisis of unhonored gentlemen’s gambling debts. No moral panic about the big banks stealing family-owned land. There is no political movement dedicated to punishing people who scam pensioners. It’s all about who can pee where, the right to murder the unborn, what if the child consents and so on.
In other words, the morality debate seems to be centered around genitalia.
And the greatest cultural commentators of our era have yet to decisively answer the age old dilemma that has baffled mankind since its inception: tits or ass?
Methinks the time has finally come to talk about greater things.
**
Morality and metaphysics are two different things. Theology and philosophy have more in common than morality and metaphysics. You could, of course, make the argument that morality is derived from metaphysics. But then you could make that argument about literally everything.
So let’s make this discussion a bit more concrete and tangible.
Some people believe that Moses talked to the one true God. Other that he went to the top of a volcano and got high off the fumes/had his face burned. Perhaps he actually spoke with dark angels as Paul believed. Or maybe he didn’t even exist at all and his story was simply a perversion of earlier Mesopotamian myths by the 70/72 Hebrew priests summoned to Alexandria to provide an account of their tribe’s origins.
This discussion has very little to do with the 613 mitzvahs governing morality and behavior found in the Bible. People have made the argument that the 613 mitzvahs are good because society benefits from their regulatory mechanism.
But not all of them, mind you. We all eat pork, for example. And most non-Protestant nations don’t mutilate their sons’ genitals like Yahweh commanded.
But that has nothing to do with the discussion that we started above. And, actually, the same argument in defense of having strict moral codes can be made in support of Shariah law. But never by the people who typically defend the mitzvahs, for some reason. Yes, women are bade to cover themselves up in the Koran, but Paul says the same in his letters, actually. Opposition to Islam is only allowed within the framework of Feminism (nationalist, racialist, spiritualist arguments are outlawed). Middle-aged Christian women like to dangle their bedazzled crosses in between their cleavage as the Savior himself intended.
But again, let’s step over the debate on morality and go a bit deeper than most people feel comfortable doing.
A better question: Was Moses truly a prophet? Did he speak to a storm god? A volcano god? The great Cosmic God? An archon of the Demiurge?
The Torah was written in 2nd century BC, actually.
You might not have anything against the 10 Commandments in the same way that I largely approve of the Soviet system of temperance and moral puritanism. But it doesn’t logically follow that I think Lenin is a semi-divine figure. Nor does it mean that I agree with the fundamental tenants of Leninist-Marxism.
If I point out that Lenin was yet another mass-murdering Hebrew prophet, I often get chided by sovoks who point out how moral the USSR was compared to what followed in the 90s. Again, these are two unrelated points. Just because the late USSR was chaste does not mean that Communism was correct in its assumptions about the nature of man and, well, commerce essentially. Furthermore, just because Moses bade his people not to kill one another doesn’t mean that he spoke with God on that mountain in Saudi Arabia. Besides, he went on to purge a significant portion of his own tribe right after that and then his successor Joshua (Stalin) launched a genocide of several peoples in Palestine. So much for “thou shalt not kill”.
So, even if you and I both approve of Christianity’s principled stand (in theory anyways) against homosexuality and pedophilia that doesn’t mean that Acts isn’t a pious fraud or that the Petrine faction of the Church wasn’t part of a conspiracy against Paul and his followers that largely succeeded by the time of the Nicene Council.
Stalin also denounced homosexuality, by the way. But he still massacred millions of hapless Russians, didn’t he? So did Mao and Castro, by the way. So we’re conflating different things that shouldn’t be conflated. We’re confused, very very confused as a people and as a larger post-Christian civilization.
**
There are actually many metaphysical narratives within Christianity that are worth scrutinizing.
This is, by no means, an exhaustive list. But here are some that we ought to re-examine.
Knowledge is bad
This is the underlying narrative of the Garden of Eden story. Yahweh wants us ignorant and he is afraid of us becoming like him and the other gods. He engages in some emergency evasive maneuvers after Adam and Eve acquire self-knowing and hide themselves from him, making sure that they never eat from the second tree - the tree of everlasting life.
Again, you may not believe that it really went down like this. That is besides the point.
The point is that this metaphysical narrative informs our views on many things, including the nature of God and of higher realities. And yes, it even trickles down into our culture. Fundamentally, we are taught that obedience to a jealous and capricious deity is good. That seeking knowledge and questing after everlasting life is evil. All of our mainstream villains in film and older mediums are portrayed as basically being esoteric knowledge-seeking, death-defying psychopaths.
Death-eaters, basically.
I was cheering for the purebloods.
And, irony of ironies, JK Rowling is a Christian who used Christian metaphysics and meta-narratives to construct her wizarding world. That, and post-WWII Liberalism, of course. Contrast this with the esoteric teaching of Europe, such as the original legend of the knights who quest after the secrets of the Holy Grail. Two different meta-narratives.
God hurts us because he loves us
First, Yahweh makes the world and makes it good. Then, the world that he made and that he governs over, with the people he breathed life into becomes corrupt. How? So he decides to destroy it. He floods the world once and promises to not flood it again. He then promptly floods it again. Yes, there are two floods in Genesis, back to back. But to save humanity from the flood that he is planning to use to wipe humanity out, he also commissions Noah to make an ark. Huh? The symbol of the rainbow is then used to mark the new covenant made with Noah to not destroy the world again. Of course, Yahweh will destroy the world again according to Revelations but not with a flood. Also, the rainbow is now the symbol of both the Noahide one-world religion agenda and of militant messianic globohomo concurrently. Ironic or prophetic?
You decide.
But in the older Greek myths though, the same story is told quite differently.
Zeus, the capricious and jealous god who, like Yahweh, dwells on a mountain and screeches his displeasure at humanity from time to time, decides to destroy the world because he is jealous of the people living on it. See, humanity was created by Prometheus (god of foresight), not by Zeus and given a soul by Athena (goddess of war and wisdom), as well as stolen fire and secret Olympian forge-magic by Prometheus. Prometheus is humanity’s champion against the whims of the capricious Olympians and his son, Deucalion, saves us from Zeus’s temper tantrum by constructing an ark. Once the waters subside, we end up in the mountains of the Caucasus, where Prometheus himself, and Caucasians are said to originate from.
Now, which story has a better meta-narrative? Again, you don’t have to believe any of it went down as it is described. But, you should be able to tease out what the meta-narrative implications of accepting one origin story over another might have on society.
One preaches abject obedience to a capricious god in the hopes that he will spare some of humanity. Despite the fact that he is portrayed as being capricious and vindictive, he is still held up as being worthy of veneration. This has led to much debate over the centuries. Children barely weaned off their mother’s milk pose the question, “if God is good, why does bad happen?” and are promptly dismissed.
A system in which God is Good and Omniscient necessitates the denial of the existence of Evil. Bad things are actually good things. The reason why we think that millions of our dead countrymen is a bad thing is because we are simply suffering from an optical illusion. What we see as Evil is actually part of a larger Good. A necessary sacrifice to bring about Judgement Day. We ought to rejoice that so many martyrs are in heaven. Just ask Augustine. Or the Russian Orthodox Church on why the European-Style-Socialist-Secular-Humanists-With-YouKnowWhoish-Last-Names Revolution occurred.
But another, older metaphysical system preaches defiance to a capricious god and taking active measures to save humanity. Or at least Caucasians, I guess.
Whichever narrative you chose, or, more importantly, whichever one society chooses to run with, will have profound implications on the development of the subsequent civilization. A system in which the god of this world is Evil, but not totally omniscient explains the existence of Evil in another way - without denying its existence, actually.
And we still have echoes of this rejected form of metaphysics in the Gospel of John and esoteric Christianity i.e., Marcionism and the various forms of Gnosticism. In these traditions, a kind of metaphysical pessimism figures front and center in their foundational worldview. An entire theology is then spun out from this first principle, much like how Nicene Christianity did, but with the fundamental metaphysical building blocks inverted.
Racial inversion
In Genesis, we also learn that sacred fire and forging techniques are trademarks of the Nephilim. They are described extremely tall men with blond and red hair, blue eyes, and pale skin who take the Hebrews’ women.
They are the reason given for why Yahweh floods the world.
Again, the Greeks, who taught a different version of this myth, portray the god behind the flood as Evil. And similar abilities attributed to the Nephilim are considered a blessing bestowed upon humanity by a rebel titan.
In other words, these two metaphysical meta-narratives are fundamentally at odds. And we know which one won out in the end, because Prometheus, in Latin, which is a fake language created to spite the Greek church, translates to Lucifer.
So, basically, the patron god (titan, really) and champion of humanity for one culture becomes the supreme representation of Evil in a hostile and alien culture (Judaism) that emerges in opposition to the original. Nicene Christianity, which is just an offshoot of Judaism, simply continues building on the same inverted metaphysical foundation even if it is critical of Judaism for not recognizing Jesus as the promised savior.
I find that it helps to conceptualize the concept of metaphysical inversion in simpler, more modern terms. Like, for example, how the hippies took the life rune and inverted it to symbolize their movement.
None of this stuff really affects the average person and his life in a direct way though.
This kind of discussion has always been relegated to obscure autists who take an inexplicable interest in such things. But because of this lack of knowledge, we are left in a state of abject confusion when we try to make sense of, say, the Satanic agenda of the current crop of ruling elites.
**
When we think of Satanic activity, we think of secret gatherings, rule by cabals of dark priests, ritualized child sacrifice … you know the thing. But Satanism is, etymologically and epistemologically, related to belief in the old religious meta-narrative and pre-Hebrew metaphysics.
But the problem we face now is that we are talking about two different kinds of Satanism and therein lies the confusion.
If we put aside the morality debate and contain our discussion to metaphysics, the reason why we interchangeably use the term Satan and Lucifer is because the metaphysical system of the old world, once overthrown, was demonized. Satan, of course, just means adversary in Hebrew. And after a revolution, any revolution, the ancien regime is labelled as being pure evil by its adversaries. This is a perennial phenomenon.
In this concrete example, Prometheus’ brother Menoetius who is described as an arrogant titan who joined the rebellion of the Titans against the Olympians only to be cast down into Tartarus and Prometheus himself become amalgamated into the description of Satan that we are familiar with now. Lucifer becomes the arrogant rebel angel who is associated with the light of false knowledge once the older Greek system of metaphysics is overthrown by the religious revolutionaries.
And yet, it’s quite clear that the “Satanism” that we are talking about when we talk about the conceptual language and belief system of the current caste of elites, is a mix of Old Testamantism, Talmudism, Kabbalism, Marxism and Trotskyism. In other words, it is NOT founded on a rejection of Yahweh or Moses or worship of a champion titan of Caucasians who is punished by Zeus. It is not founded on Greek or Indo-European mythology at all. Far from it.
Ask yourself: do you see the elites promoting Hercules, the great Scythian barbarian-hero and the savior of Prometheus?
Or Achilles, the hero whose destiny was supposed to be to challenge Zeus for the Olympian throne?
No, of course not. Too much Toxic Hyperborean Masculinity in such ancient hero archetypes.
One thing is for certain though: a significant portion of dissident-minded peasants believe that the elites who rule over us are indeed “Satanists”. And Satanism, in most people’s minds amounts to a corruption or outright inversion of the moral code. The peasants don’t really understand who or what, exactly, the elites are worshipping and why. But it is undeniably that powerful people are pushing transgenderism, pedophilia, feminism and the rest on a hapless peasant population as part of a concerted agenda. We are experiencing an explicit rejection of what used to be the dominant Christian moral code of society. And for that matter the moral code of the Communist USSR that my grandparents, my parents and yours truly was raised in is being rejected as well. Also, the Confucianist Communist Chinese may be sending weather balloons over Montana, but they’re not the ones trying to get your children to lop off their genitals and start hormone replacement therapy. They’re as appalled by what they see and hear coming out of the West as they are baffled. The kind of social conservatism promoted in China by the Communist Party would be castigated as Fascism in the West by American conservatives.
The point is that the peasants are confused (what else is new) but they are reacting to very real observable phenomenon and doing their best to come to grips with what they see and sense being foisted upon them by a hostile elite. The terminology and conceptual terms that the peasants have to work with, however, do not allow them to see the truth through the flickering monitor darkly.
In other words, the elite does indeed want to to impose state-mandated homosexuality on us and indoctrinate our kids into sexual Communism. But does that mean that Greek metaphysical myths are to blame for our current predicament? Do our hostile ruling elites really worship a Caucasian titan named Lucifer/Prometheus who was saved by Hercules and who champions humanity against Zeus?
If not, then we need to change the metaphysical model that we are working with if for nothing else than to make better sense of the enemy’s agenda. Because we do not understand their agenda, we are defenseless as things stand now.
**
It seems almost tone-deaf to complain about the metaphysics that we have been working with for at least a thousand years. The lived reality of most people is the far more pressing problem of adult perverts twerking in front of their kids at public school and the rapidly rising costs of living. Eggs are becoming a luxury good for Chrissakes!
And yet, what I said had to be said and ought to be repeated.
Because even if we reimpose a certain level of social conservatism on society, we’d still be left with a broken system of metaphysics that promotes blind fealty to rulers in high places who do not seem to have our best interests at heart. A religious system that denies its adherents access to the mystical arts and then outlaws them. That preaches hatred of the already-defeated ancien metaphysical regime of our almost mythical ancestors and sets itself against their entire life view - sets us against part of ourselves.
We exist in a perpetual revolutionary state where one cycle of overthrow and bloodshed replaces the previous one and we hurtle towards darker and darker unknowns at breakneck speed. If we take the time to pause and study the past, we can make sense of it. We can identify the casual events that set the rest of the dominoes falling after them.
A key such moment occurred when we lost our metaphysical grounding.
When we started seeing Good and the hidden hand of God in places and occurrences that prompt the honest babe to ask, “why is there such Evil and corruption ever-present in our world?” only to be chastised.
When the Good became Evil and Evil became an optical illusion to get us to lower our guard.
When capricious and malevolent gods suddenly become “Good” and humanity became Evil and deserving of punishment.
This system doesn’t even protect us from our enemies - it simply finds ways to justify the continued abuse. The explanation for calamity is always the same: either we deserved it, or, it’s actually Good in disguise.
And if you think long and hard about it, the first 5D “just trust me, bro” leap in reasoning occurred in Genesis, and, the iron chain of casualty advanced through the centuries to eventually give us 5D prophets like Qanon and the Saker. You may not see how this came to pass yet, but rest assured, I see the infernal logic as clearly as I see the blinking cursor on my screen. And by the time the blinking on this blog stops, you will see it too.
**
We act like we know everything there is to be known about the higher realms. That the book is closed on the topic. That there is only one god, that he and his son are Jewish, that this god is jealous and angry and omniscient and all-Good and that Evil is just a useful foil that he uses to effect his agenda. And that it was always so. That the ending is known, and that after total victory by the forces of Satan, the dead bodies will rise from their graves once Jesus returns. And that time will then end for good.
Unlike older metaphysical systems, where Chronos overthrows Uranus only to be overthrown by Zeus who should have been overthrown by Achilles, the one we have now is fixed and set in stone. It is comparable to the now-discarded cosmic model of Aristotle, who alleged that the heavens were stable and unchanging, contrary to even the evidence that he had available at his time.
But now we know that the heavens are not stable.
That comets rain down on us with cyclical regularity.
That the planets wander.
That there are objects that travel through our system and then move on.
That the Earth spins at different speeds. That gravity fluctuates. That the planet wobbles. That the magnetic north is on the move. And that this relative stability that we enjoy now teeters on a knife’s edge at any given time. The world has been wiped out by floods and comets before and almost certainly will be again.
And so too will our metaphysical understanding of the world change again, in time.
This cycle came to be dominated by a priestly elite that then systematically took over the rest of society and most of the world. Once they had successfully imposed their metaphysics on the nations, the rest was only a matter of time. And once we accepted the mentality of a foreign people over our own, we were already defeated and subjugated then and there.
This is Plato’s Plan made manifest. This is the poison gift of Don Juan’s Predator to us.
A piece of our oppressor’s mind grafted onto ours. Now you think you are them. Now you defend them, thinking you are defending yourself. Thinking that when they praise themselves they also praise you. That if you praise them, that their god will love you too. That if you smite their enemies, that their god will pass over you. That their god is your god. In actual fact you are a mark to be fleeced and slaughtered when the time comes, just like the rest of us.
But you aren’t ready to accept that just yet.
This is one of the best things you've ever written.
The theology question is one of the most divisive issues in the dissident right. Yes, even more so than tits vs ass (tits, obviously. Tits are the substitute ass that developed following bipedalism to leverage primate sexual arousal wiring. Ass may by the OG but tits are the evolved overman's choice). Just the other day I was in a chat, chuckling as I watched yet another jihad between tradcatcs and neo-Hellenes. "Your Christian God is a semitic fraud!" "Your pagan deities are literally demons!"
All fucking nonsense, of course. If one must believe in gods - and why not, for archetypes have a reality all their own, at the very least - then the solution is quite obvious, once you've done some digging. Yes, there is one cosmic God, one Sky Father who created and rules over all, and He is not the unique property of any one people, or even any given species. But there are many levels between us and Him, and whether one calls the the beings that reside there gods or angels is a matter of semantics. Let the pagan pantheons be angels, then, for the pagans also acknowledged a supreme being after all; there, done, everyone can be happy.
Well, maybe not quite. After all, God casts a bright light, but His Shadow has a presence all its own. And the Shadow may trick you into thinking that it is God. Some may pretend to believe this, while knowingly worshipping the Shadow; others may simply be fooled. So who are they really aligned with?
By their fruits you shall know them.
Well, where does that leave us, in regards to mortal leaders vs. gods? A believer in the goodness of the One True God has little problem believing that Putin was sent by Him to save us. However the Gnostic Christians would suggest that Putin is just another corrupted agent of the Demiurge. Me, I just think DNA is God. Which is cool when on mushrooms, but when back on earth, is basically a knife fight.