I’m guessing that the initial question was rhetorical, but of course it’s not moral to criticise our superiors. Our superiors decide what is right and they say that criticising them is bad so that’s that. Morality 101.
Rurik, why doesn’t Rolo give up on Russia and support Belarus with his tax shekels instead? He would be a hoot at somewhere like Belta, and the cheese and salami are delicious.
Russian salami is better in general. For some reason like 75% of Belarussian salami is like that soft flaccid variant whereas in Russian you could beat someone to death with uncut salami. Personally I find the latter way better. Belarus surpasses Russia in everything but salami.
FFS don't inflict us with some Dreizin shit tactics, I never gave him a cent despite his abuse (and I'm glad since he showed himself a Gaza genocide apologist).
You got to realize that you're either doing the influencer game and prostitute yourself and maybe make a living or fight the good fight and stay poor. This is the old soul way, the distrust of money as a necessary evil. This is what distinguish of from the chosen.
Americans / protestants have been corrupted by the lure of easy money it's Mammon all over again.
Your content is way too niche to make enough money. I don't know many person that could understand it and not even one single person that wouldn't dismiss it as crackpotery.
I believe it's a hidden gem but I could be wrong you could also be a CIA plant.
You chose to adress intelligent readers. Don't use BS emotional tactics to get money, they'll give if they consider it's worth their time / money.
FWIW I never pay for content online (I make slightly better than minimum wage in France), what does it tell you that I paid for yours?
Nice comparison of Hitler and Putin, RS. Both were pushed into action by Wall Street and the White House, which also encouraged resistance to them. Lots of $$$$$$ and goy blood for (((banksters)))!
There's also a comparison with Trump. In office both Trump and Putin did nothing for nativist patriots. Are they both Jewish, or are they useful 'front-goys' because they don't look Jewish, although really they are, and of course everyone around them has been carefully Chosen, and reflection from the boss makes them seem less so?
Miles Mathis points out that the top two alternatives given on the internet on any controversy are probably both controlled by the same interests. 'By way of deception shalt thou make war', and yes they are always at war with humanity. (That Biblical injunction could be seen to apply both to how they deceive in their own conflicts, and also how they create wars between others.)
When the Internet was new and available on the new 'personal computers' recently put on the desks of all office-workers to turn them into typists after the 'typing pool' had been fired to save money, it became an amazing source of information for those who were curious. In particular sites like the Institute for Historical Research and the Committee for Open Discussion of the Holocaust made much information available which the (((respectable))) publishing houses would not touch.
This has made some inroads into the monolithic Holocaustomania imposed on the public as a major tenet of required belief replacing Christianity. Algora blog reports that only about half of Americans still believe this horror story, and that the young and non-white are more resistant to it.
It looks as if ANYTHING heavily promoted by 'official' and ((('trustworthy'))) sources will be a lie and harmful to the mental health and social interests of humanity, especially white people, since the subversion has been carefully designed to harm us.
Holocaustianity did replace Christianity as a state religion. But why do states seemingly need a state religion, to the extent that dissenters are punished with utmost severity?
Cosmos and state are one. That's why dissenters are punished, because they oppose the natural divinely ordered state of things. That's Evil, and shows they intend to destroy everything Good!
That's always been the basis of the claim to universal authority by Emperors, and to a lesser extent, Kings. Throne and Altar have always propped each other up. States need supernatural sanction to avoid appearing to be just the most successful criminals in a region. (You know the story of Alexander and the pirate!) Compliance is greatly facilitated thereby, although it gives the priests power over the rulers. Medieval Christianity was clear about this. Unless you are divinely appointed, as shown by coronation and Church blessing, you cannot be more than a tyrannical usurper, and people, especially the nobles who provide the armed force, are justified in opposing you.
This goes back to the ancient Mesopotamian temple-city-states, and seems especially strong in Semitic history. The priestly rulers of Jerusalem saw themselves in this light, and losing Jerusalem and its temple only reinforced their mission to attain rule over the whole world (starting with Rome and the Judaism-for-Gentiles which took charge as the empire became semiticised. The Roman ruling class had become orientalised before Christianity was imposed.
Nowadays the religious aspect is less prominent. Now they use 'technology' to 'manufacture consent', not only through control of academia and media and dumbing people down to remain ignorant and willing shabbos goyim. As the world saw in the last American Presidential election, even if the social and educational conditioning fails, reactionary proles won't be allowed to 'wrong-vote', as the machines will correct their votes and invent as many more as necessary - and anyone who objects is 'anti-semitic'! Of course they must be punished with the utmost severity, for opposing the divinely appointed order of the cosmos.
Great post. I've been reading what I can on TG but only a few are in English that are really juicy. Its so much better than the video-based social media.
I actually credit you with breaking The Gaggle - George had literally no defence against thehail-like truth bombs. He's never recovered. Was like you beat him with a Belarus salami (kosher of course)
I’m guessing that the initial question was rhetorical, but of course it’s not moral to criticise our superiors. Our superiors decide what is right and they say that criticising them is bad so that’s that. Morality 101.
Rurik, why doesn’t Rolo give up on Russia and support Belarus with his tax shekels instead? He would be a hoot at somewhere like Belta, and the cheese and salami are delicious.
Actually I applied through a friend and never heard back.
Russian salami is better in general. For some reason like 75% of Belarussian salami is like that soft flaccid variant whereas in Russian you could beat someone to death with uncut salami. Personally I find the latter way better. Belarus surpasses Russia in everything but salami.
Agreed; the hard salami is far better.
FFS don't inflict us with some Dreizin shit tactics, I never gave him a cent despite his abuse (and I'm glad since he showed himself a Gaza genocide apologist).
You got to realize that you're either doing the influencer game and prostitute yourself and maybe make a living or fight the good fight and stay poor. This is the old soul way, the distrust of money as a necessary evil. This is what distinguish of from the chosen.
Americans / protestants have been corrupted by the lure of easy money it's Mammon all over again.
Your content is way too niche to make enough money. I don't know many person that could understand it and not even one single person that wouldn't dismiss it as crackpotery.
I believe it's a hidden gem but I could be wrong you could also be a CIA plant.
You chose to adress intelligent readers. Don't use BS emotional tactics to get money, they'll give if they consider it's worth their time / money.
FWIW I never pay for content online (I make slightly better than minimum wage in France), what does it tell you that I paid for yours?
First of all welcome. I like your worldview and I’m glad to have you.
Second of all, YOU UNDERESTIMATE MY POWER!!
Thanks for the pat on the head master, I'll go back to the mine shaft after my bowel movement.
You're correct that his content is way to niche and targeted to make much money but the Lord Humungus memeing is pretty funny.
Nice comparison of Hitler and Putin, RS. Both were pushed into action by Wall Street and the White House, which also encouraged resistance to them. Lots of $$$$$$ and goy blood for (((banksters)))!
There's also a comparison with Trump. In office both Trump and Putin did nothing for nativist patriots. Are they both Jewish, or are they useful 'front-goys' because they don't look Jewish, although really they are, and of course everyone around them has been carefully Chosen, and reflection from the boss makes them seem less so?
Miles Mathis points out that the top two alternatives given on the internet on any controversy are probably both controlled by the same interests. 'By way of deception shalt thou make war', and yes they are always at war with humanity. (That Biblical injunction could be seen to apply both to how they deceive in their own conflicts, and also how they create wars between others.)
When the Internet was new and available on the new 'personal computers' recently put on the desks of all office-workers to turn them into typists after the 'typing pool' had been fired to save money, it became an amazing source of information for those who were curious. In particular sites like the Institute for Historical Research and the Committee for Open Discussion of the Holocaust made much information available which the (((respectable))) publishing houses would not touch.
This has made some inroads into the monolithic Holocaustomania imposed on the public as a major tenet of required belief replacing Christianity. Algora blog reports that only about half of Americans still believe this horror story, and that the young and non-white are more resistant to it.
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2023/12/09/only-half-of-us-young-adults-believe-that-the-holocaust-happened
It looks as if ANYTHING heavily promoted by 'official' and ((('trustworthy'))) sources will be a lie and harmful to the mental health and social interests of humanity, especially white people, since the subversion has been carefully designed to harm us.
That's the real morality of the situation.
Holocaustianity did replace Christianity as a state religion. But why do states seemingly need a state religion, to the extent that dissenters are punished with utmost severity?
Cosmos and state are one. That's why dissenters are punished, because they oppose the natural divinely ordered state of things. That's Evil, and shows they intend to destroy everything Good!
That's always been the basis of the claim to universal authority by Emperors, and to a lesser extent, Kings. Throne and Altar have always propped each other up. States need supernatural sanction to avoid appearing to be just the most successful criminals in a region. (You know the story of Alexander and the pirate!) Compliance is greatly facilitated thereby, although it gives the priests power over the rulers. Medieval Christianity was clear about this. Unless you are divinely appointed, as shown by coronation and Church blessing, you cannot be more than a tyrannical usurper, and people, especially the nobles who provide the armed force, are justified in opposing you.
This goes back to the ancient Mesopotamian temple-city-states, and seems especially strong in Semitic history. The priestly rulers of Jerusalem saw themselves in this light, and losing Jerusalem and its temple only reinforced their mission to attain rule over the whole world (starting with Rome and the Judaism-for-Gentiles which took charge as the empire became semiticised. The Roman ruling class had become orientalised before Christianity was imposed.
Nowadays the religious aspect is less prominent. Now they use 'technology' to 'manufacture consent', not only through control of academia and media and dumbing people down to remain ignorant and willing shabbos goyim. As the world saw in the last American Presidential election, even if the social and educational conditioning fails, reactionary proles won't be allowed to 'wrong-vote', as the machines will correct their votes and invent as many more as necessary - and anyone who objects is 'anti-semitic'! Of course they must be punished with the utmost severity, for opposing the divinely appointed order of the cosmos.
Holy shit, sometimes the internet delivers. Thanks for this great reply.
Great post. I've been reading what I can on TG but only a few are in English that are really juicy. Its so much better than the video-based social media.
I actually credit you with breaking The Gaggle - George had literally no defence against thehail-like truth bombs. He's never recovered. Was like you beat him with a Belarus salami (kosher of course)
i dont recall this?
i thought it was cordial
It was cordial and a good interview. But he was clearly taken aback by a contrarian position.
LOL