Is President Putin A Moral, Conservative, Christian Man?

Can he be trusted to lead the worldwide morality hyperwar against Big Homo?

As we all well know by now, President Putin is a Christian Crusader fighting for moral bragging rights in heaven and that means that there is a ZERO tolerance for Western degeneracy in Russia under his government. Under Yeltsin’s and Putin’s conservative reigns, they dismantled Communism in Russia and rebuilt conservative Christianity in its place. Since then, the Kremlin has assumed its position as the moral superpower of the world and a beacon of hope for anti-Globalist conservatives everywhere. Living in Russia’s big cities, one feels like they are living in a golden ancient era of tradition and culture! Experts have been able to pin down Russia’s retro moral orientation all the way back to the social zeitgeist of Ohio circa 2007.

Yes, it’s that conservative.

NOTE: that was an example of irony. Or at least I think it is? Or maybe I know and I’m just being ironic? Maybe I’m using irony as a safety net so that I can pretend that I was just pretending to not know? I do know though that homosexuals use irony as a kind of smokescreen to hide their true intentions by falling back on claiming they were only saying and doing things ironically.

Irony aside (banned on this blog going forward), Russia and Belarus and Ukraine did have a lot of positive aspects going for them. Moving there, one is immediately struck by how much healthier and less oppressive it is when compared to the West. Women generally hate it with a passion though and pine to move to the West.

Totalitarianism turns them on, I guess.

Mostly, it comes as a kind of culture shock to American visitors to see White people gentrifying colonizers in major cities in Russia and to see skinny people among them as well! This is because the people who used to live in these countries decided to prove to the world that they aren’t racists. They succeeded — after living in a few American cities, I can honestly say that I believe them! Well done! Putting aside the imported vibrancy, the Anglosphere in particular, has also been conquered by a pernicious alien brood known only to us humans as “the Fats”. Our records indicate that the last skinny person in America was devoured at a Walmart in Kansas circa 2019 and scientists surmise that the species have died out in North America since. What’s worse, few Russians understand that being able to see your own penis in America is considered a severe social faux pas and opens one up to ridicule and physical abuse, often at the hands of law enforcement, who you have to tip and salute before and while they arrest you to prove that the terrorists haven’t won.

NOTE: this is not an example of irony; it is simply absurdism mixed with not-so-subtle mockery and crude humor.

Of course, in many ways Russia is still not as conservative as America.

In Bibleland, for example, penile mutilation is actually a mainstay of the conservative movement, and the Left has been trying to move into and appropriate this conservative practice in recent years with their gender-reassignment surgeries.

Yes, American conservatives lop their penis tips off to totally own the libs, epic style.

But, despite the fact that Russians don’t read the Bible and therefore do not mutilate their boys like God himself commanded, they still manage to maintain a moral superpower extending into Ukraine. This is why they are winning the Not-War in Donbass, by the way — because God gives the moral side military victories every single time. That is how you know who is more moral in this war. Because we know that Russia is winning the war, we also know that they are more moral because God rewards the moral with military victories. This is simply how military strategy works.

Did God stutter when he said he’d help the IDF defeat the iron chariot-riders of the north through their faith in him and him alone? Did Moses not cut the penis tip off of his son and smear it on his own dick to create a kind of iron dome force field to protect himself from God’s wrath? Did not the early Christians cut their genitals off before storming the temples of the pagan world?

NOTE: this was just a statement of fact with a value judgment that I added to it. I accurately explained the thought-process of the average ZAnnoner and I didn’t make up those scenes in the Bible, so I don’t understand why Bible-ists would take offense to me bringing them up.

Yeah, that’s what I thought.

Furthermore, Conservatives were actually cutting up their genitals before it was cool. Their God, Yeshua, who was born perfect unto the world, had to remove his penis tip to follow God’s (that is, his) commandment. In fact, it is high-time for conservatives the world over to unite and take back genital mutilation from the degenerate left, who do it to spite God instead of to abase ourselves before God like we’re supposed to be doing.

Conservatives in America quiver and quake at the very mention of God’s true name YHWH and his wrath that is inflicted on those who displease him. Worshipping a deity out of morbid fear is a masculine trait, see? Yes, obeying an entity because it threatens you with torture and damnation is noble and what Freedom Democracy Values is all about. And that’s what these goddamn Libtards won’t ever understand!

Hoo-ah and ki-yah!

TRUE conservatives mutilate themselves out of FEAR of God, not to defy his moral order!

Furthermore, it was actually the Democrats of the ancient world who had slaves, not Abraham Lincoln, who tried to free his people from Pharaoh’s cotton fields in Egypt, see?

NOTE: this part was satire. Actually, I think that there were elements of satire in all the above paragraphs. Whatever, I’m sure you could find a Substack sophist to explain my grammatical errors to you if you tried. Me and my Stalkers are having a good time and that’s all that matters. Can you say the same?

…

OK enough of that.

I need a little bit of fun now and then, so don’t hold it against me, Substack-sophistos.

Today, I figured I’d take a moment to reassure my moral readers of their moral superiority over their political enemies before explaining why Russia is a moral bastion of morality morals as well. We will mostly look at Russia’s leader, who is a paragon of morality himself.

Moral Conservatism in the USSR and Russia

As we all know, the institute of marriage is sacred and inviolable in Christian, conservative countries like Russia … unless of course someone (80+% of the time the woman) wants to get a divorce for any reason at any time. They can also abort their baby with state support anywhere in the Slavlands and perhaps even the entirety of the FSU except maybe Uzbekistan.

But that’s whatever. No one cares.

Let’s talk about the fun stuff today instead.

In terms of personal morality, Vladimir Putin himself got divorced from his first wife Lyudmila Putina, and the cord was pulled allegedly after many years of estrangement and extramarital affairs. This is also likely one those rare examples where it was the man who initiated the divorce proceedings against the woman. That is one privilege that the wealthy and powerful still have in the East that their counterparts don’t seem to have in the West.

Russia’s deranged feminists point this out and complain about it all the time. They are almost exclusively an elitist movement of socialette women who married rich men and are upset that they didn’t get more resources out of the divorce. You look at all the prominent SJWs in Russia and you find extremely powerful and influential xeno-women, some of whom were already in their positions of authority before the collapse of the USSR. The best example of this is Putin’s former boss’ daughter and wife, the Sobchak matriarchs, who are a powerful Liberalizing node of influence and power in the media.

Naturally, despite the Sobchaks supporting SJWism with their connections and media resources, they remain off-limits because Ksenia is Putin’s god-daughter. It’s all in the (crime) family. More reading here:

At the time, Putin’s divorce was considered very “new money” of him and not looked upon kindly by older socially conservative age demos because they, as a cohort, largely stayed together to the bitter end and the whole divorce thing only really became vogue and popular in the 90s.

The tabloids also reported that he was seeing a hot gymnast on the side before the divorce and the offending publication was actually shut down by the FSB for running the story about his affair. Many years later, Putin’s relationship with the hot woman 30 years his junior was made public, confirming the old rumors.

Nowadays, similar rumors swirl that Putin’s daughters/daughter by this Ms. Alina Kabaeva, and she herself, all live in Switzerland and are Swiss citizens. Most of Putin’s inner circle has foreign passports, so this is nothing special. This actually makes perfect sense when you understand that Putin, like everyone else, is the sum of the five closest people around him — who are all Western agents and either crooks or spooks.

But yes, it is too shocking to consider if you thought him to be a Christian Crusader or something.

I don’t blame him for the upgrade, by the way. Don’t think I’m moralizing at the man here, because I’m not a Christian Feminist constantly demanding that men “man up” and put up with the terroristic demands of church ladies using Jesus as a cudgel. Nah, I’d trade in the older model for a newer one if I could as well.

Although I can’t imagine doing that in my late 50s and 60s, honestly.

In fact, I can’t imagine caring that much about sex past 40 as Putin’s generation all seem to do. It is like a permanent high school prom dance with that generation. They go round and round with their constant love affairs, mistresses, divorces and so on. Listen to their music and it is all about this sort of thing. Or just turn on Slavlands daytime television to see society’s dregs caught on hidden cameras and then yelling at each other from across couches on set for the entertainment of millions of grannies sitting at home munching on sunflower seeds, glued to the screen day in and day out.

Personally, re-marrying strikes me as a very decadent and strange thing to do once a man already has grandkids. Akin to buying a convertible or wearing a baseball cap backward to feel younger. But again, although it isn’t very Christian behavior to get a divorce (isn’t that a deadly sin?) and a lover and a child out of wedlock, I see it as a symptom of the times, and nothing more. Our society is a daytime television shit-flinging show and our elites behave just like the apes invited on stage to yell obscenities at one another. In fact, our elites run these shows and make money off encouraging the worst kind of behavior among the dregs of humanity.

But they are our moral betters, so who are we to complain?

By the way, did I ever tell you the story about how I was invited on one of those dating shows? Its called “Let’s Get Married” and my parents flat-out refused to go on with me. That’s the kind of class that money can’t buy. Shame though. Me, personally, I don’t mind rolling around in the mud from time to time.

Frankly, I just chafe at the idea that the elite in Russia all allow themselves second and third wives, but keep punitive laws in place to prevent the rest of us from doing the same. What’s good for the gander is good for the goose, no? And if it isn’t, well then why do all of Russia’s elite have multiple wives, mistresses, errant children running amok? I mean, they have the power to reform some of the excesses of the 90s and the Trotskyite social reforms of the early USSR years which were never struck down, right? If not, who does? If they were were Christians or conservatives, wouldn’t they want to jail the pornographers, and make a couple of examples of women divorcing their husbands?

Instead, again, Putin’s god-daughter, Ksenia Sobchak is an unrepentant pornstar. I mean, seriously. Also, like all of Putin’s inner circle, she is only somewhat Russian.

Curiously, the Islamic regions of Russia are allowed to do whatever the want, mostly, in flagrant defiance of the secular state law. Women still get stoned and even knifed in some of these non-Russian republics, or in the areas populated by the migrants in Russian cities. But the Russian police lets these people police themselves for the most part. Basically, the Muslims get to keep their patriarchy while the Russian men are subjected to the worst excesses of Trotskyite social libertinism. And we often hear from Russian state media that we have so much to learn from Russia’s Muslims, don’t we? OK, so why not copy their social policies? Why can’t we have clans and patriarchy like they do?

Related to this topic, there is a critically-acclaimed modern Russian show called “Slova Patsana” that you might like to check out. It depicts the life of young hoodlums in the USSR in the 80s onwards. From what Putin has shared or what we know about his time working for the *Judeo-Judo mafia in St. Petersburg, his life probably resembles that of the characters.

*

Russia at the time is depicted as a brutalist matriarchy with young men rebelling through acts of senseless violence against both their mothers and by extension, the ideology of the state that these women enforced and represented.

Much of what came later in the 90s is explained by the social situation in the 80s.

Similar themes are brought up in Chuck Palahniuk’s Fight Club. Also, to those who don’t know, Chuck is from a Ukrainian family. It seems like he got so hen-pecked in his youth that he turned homosexual later on because of his visceral disdain for women. Can’t say I approve of his coping mechanism, but I do see how that sort of thing seems to be occurring more and more in society and it sickens me how we aren’t allowed to talk about it, only celebrate it. The gay thing was anathema to the youth of the Slavlands though, because they understood how severely it undermined male-bonding, which would have undermined the youth gang culture.

That is probably why homosexuality is promoted in the West so heavily — to prevent men from banding together by labeling male friendships and male-only organizations as being for homosexuals. The “cool” Western male was conditioned to want to spend all of his time with women and minorities and to eschew camaraderie with his peers. They didn’t want a “Project Mayhem” situation unfolding in the West as they shipped the jobs away and destroyed the family. As a result, young men in the West look and behave like homosexuals — they even talk like them too. What is this so-called “banter” that I am always subjected to if not a form of homosexual flirting?

American male: “Nah man, yeah, like if I was gay, I’d totally DO you bro, like, no homo, no cap, you feel me?”

I guess he’s just being ironic though, right!? And that makes it OK!

That is, he thinks he’s come up with a clever way to express himself without suffering the consequences associated with openness and honesty. I mean, have you heard young peoples’ humor nowadays? It is all self-deprecation and self-loathing done under the guise of irony. When a 35 and below gets up on stage to make a funny, all I hear is a kind of feral scream emanating from the soul begging for some semblance of authenticity or, alternatively, the sweet release of death. This kind of “humor” is usually delivered with a knowing and ironic smirk. The ironically-detached nice-cool-tolerant-guy jokester waits for the right moment to add “I’m just kidding though” before dropping the mic and sulking off the stage to rousing applause.

And what are all the tattoos and piercings and drug abuse if not a form of self-abuse as well?

But whatever!

Whatever.

In contrast to these sad cases, Putin really is a paragon of morality and masculinity. I mean, he has sex … with women!

*gasps*

Yes! In 2023 no less! A politician who has sex … wait for it … with the fe-males!

*a thud as someone faints from the shock*

Now, I know what you’re thinking: “woah, I too partake of the sex and the woman and the breasts, yes! Putin-man like me! Also sex me have! God!” And that is a very good point that you bring up, casual reader. Good job! And congrats on making it so far into today’s article.

*click* And here’s your treat!

Yes, in all seriousness, Putin and his whole generation is more masculine than anyone you will find in the West … but that’s not saying much. And many people, clearly, confuse criminality for masculinity. I remember being struck (and nauseated) by the writings of Jack Donovan, a masculinity guru in America, who wrote books about how masculinity was essentially always just ancient gangland culture writ large. This bears echoes of the themes of Fight Club, no? Finding one’s masculinity in over-the-top displays of self-destructive violence? Hitting rock-bottom? Of course, Donovan is a homosexual, like Palahniuk, who brags about sadistically sodomizing the men in his gang. And this detail is often left out in masculinity circles who are fans of his work, which is a crying shame.

It is as if we have only crude caricatures of masculinity to choose from everywhere we turn.

Yes, masculinity is in large part about banding together with like-minded men, bonding with these men and then working together to effect change on the world. But to characterize this as gangsterism is an obscene perversity. Being an irate, out-of-control mess of emotions and belligerent violence is what other gurus like Tucker and Elons’ new friends, the Taint brothers, promote. In a way, they are like the flip-side to Jordan Peterson. Both poles remind me more of the behavior of transvestites in Thailand on female hormones than men (or bodybuilders on the same hormones who sleep with said transvestites in Thailand, actually). Some of them sell bizarre gimmicks like exposing your testicles to UV light as a means of taking back one’s masculinity. You have so many of these caricature-cartoonists on the internet posing as dissident intellectuals taking ancient, archetypical and metaphysical concepts and reducing them to their crudest and most perverse form and winning cult followings for doing so. Almost as if they are biologically wired to subvert and destroy and mislead or something.

Weird.

But there is something that can be called the “sacred masculine” that is metaphysical and that has nothing to do with getting prison tats and making other men your bitches in exchange for cigarettes and drugs and I guess I’m going to have to be the one to spell it all out one day on this blog.

I know JC has mentioned “Tonic Masculinity” before:

Tonic Masculinity

But I intend to go much further with this and me being me, I’d call it Mystical or Metaphysical Masculinity instead, to the raucous guffawing of buffoons who think that acting like a woman or a homosexuals’ caricature of what a man is, is actually alpha and red-pilled or something. Yes, to “men” who think masculinity is about sandwiches, blowjobs and wet farts, the whole gangster thesis of masculinity makes perfect sense. Most moderns cannot conceptualize of any kind of genuine spirituality that isn’t just empty moralizing or brutal God-on-human tyranny. Adherence to and knowledge of what used to be known as the heavenly Sky Father principle is considered fruity nowadays.

How …. dare I say it ... ironic?

Allow me to add this:

• Society isn’t about “monkeys making sticks and banding together with more monkeys to collect more coconuts”.

• Nor is a monarch just a tin-pot dictator or a president who has been in office for 20 years for lack of a better idea and because they know what will happen to them the moment that they leave.

• Furthermore, an aristocracy isn’t a bunch of Silicon Valley genetic refuse microdosing on LSD while optimizing search engine results and creating dog-dating apps.

If you know who I am mocking, you know. If you don’t, don’t worry about it. Just beware of Dissident Inc. doing all of your edgy thinking for you. That’s all I’ll say about that whole crowd of CIA-sourced freaks for now though.

Back to Russia.

It’s not all bad there, to be fair.

Luckily, the police in Russia still can’t execute no-knock raids on Russian men over domestic dispute call-ins. But trust me, human rights activists are pushing hard to institute draconian vaginal policies in Russia as well. In fact, it is one of the WEF Green Agenda platform planks that neighboring countries like Kazakhstan have already signed on to to secure foreign capital loans from the West. Yes, Kazakh police have now been empowered to raid domiciles based on the flimsiest of pretexts like a neighbor’s suspicion or hearing a cry or sobbing (or at least claiming to).

I worked in Kazakh media and saw how the Tokayev-controlled MSM was praising these extremist reforms from all of its media mouthpieces, tone-deaf right up until the moment that their government was almost overthrown by a populist uprising and a pre-prepared coup by … someone.

See, the globalists understand that the greatest allies of the totalitarian system are strong, independent women and spiritual women who have been “empowered” by the state to turn their own men over to the state. That is why Soros types bribe governments the world over into instituting gynocracy first and thereby achieve their totalitarian reforms in that manner.

It makes me wonder why Putin, the modern living symbol of rugged masculinity and resistance to Globalist shenanigans, hasn’t spoken out against this or done something to re-masculinize Russia?

Maybe he hasn’t had enough time. After all, it’s only been 20+ years, so we have to be patient while waiting for the 5D plan to fall into place, I’m sure.

(^sarcasm).

While we wait though, I may as well mention that Putin’s first wife now lives in France, and is married to some oligarch there. You’d think that this would be a security concern, having someone who knew Putin for 30 years and was privy to many of his secrets being abroad … but no, you’d be wrong.

She is among old friends there, clearly.

Moving along, Putin’s first two daughters, according to tabloid reports, spent a significant portion of their time in the West, same as all the other oligarchs’ children.

One of his daughters ended up marrying into a powerful ethnic oligarch clan.

She ended up getting a divorce eventually, a settlement and Putin possibly got a grandkid out of it.

Question: Is it Christian to marry your daughter off to a Pharisee and then to divorce him for money? I wonder what a Moscow Patriarchate priest would say if asked to make a moral assessment of the president.

Answer: he’d gulp nervously, tuck his beard into his belt and pull his skirt up to his knees as he ran for the hills of course.

Although Kirill did condemn the Kremlin’s deliberate democide of the Russian people recently, so that was nice of him. You sure won’t hear Pope Francis ever saying anything like that. Orthodoxy really does remain the least bad ideology out there to choose from and I encourage all Christians to embrace it as a stepping stone to eventually leaving Christianity behind entirely like I did.

Now, Putin rarely talks about his family, but he has mentioned that one of his daughters is involved somehow with vaccines and had been one of the first to be tested with the Sputnik concoction:

Is this moral though?

This was almost certainly a deliberate PR move by him to establish a new career position for his daughter. Yes, Katerina may have been planning to pivot into some kind of WEF biotech role, judging from her TV appearance before COVID in which she was presented as a biotech expert talking up some kind of Elon Musk, neuralink mind-chip system that she said was coming to Russia soon. Here:

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s mysterious daughter “Katerina” – who he has never publicly acknowledged by name – made her debut on Russian state TV on Thursday.

Katerina Tikhonova – commonly believed to be the youngest of the president’s two daughters from his first marriage – was seen on state TV channel Rossiya 1, talking about advancements in technology aimed at controlling electrical impulses in the brain, BBC Monitoring reported.

On the evening news show, the 33-year-old was introduced with the title "deputy director of the institute for mathematical research of complex systems at Moscow's State University," the report said.

Before that, she was a competitive dancer, although Putin never publicly acknowledged his relationship to her. This is because Putin doesn’t like to share much about his family and there has been documented suppression of tabloids who report on the scandals surrounding him and his buddies’ infidelities and divorces and children running amok by state security agencies.

Me, I’m all for repressing journalists, but I don’t agree with Putin’s belief that his personal affairs are off-limits. A politician’s personal life is just about the only thing that the public has to go on when trying to make sense of a politician because the rest is literally just curated lies. No, I don’t think Putin has a right to privacy like you and I do because you and I aren’t responsible for the fate of hundreds of millions of people. In America, it is a relevant detail that both Trump and Biden and almost every other top politician has married their children off to ethnic oligarchs.

This tells us for whom they are building their legacies.

The fact that Russia’s ostentatiously Christian politicians all marry into the same clan is not as common knowledge as in the West thanks to media repression, but it is just as relevant nonetheless.

Also, obviously, Western intelligence agencies know all about Putin’s family and lovers and kids and what they get up to. They wouldn’t be intelligence agencies if they didn’t know this important information, now would they? So, the suppression of information is meant to keep us peasants in the dark, not to keep Putin’s intentions safe from the CIA, clearly. And isn’t it funny how the West largely cooperates with Putin’s wishes to not share anything about his personal life? You’d think that if they really saw him as enemy no. 1, they’d be eager to expose him and his family, no?

Hmm …

You know, the only other moral criteria by which I can evaluate the personal Putin or not is his relationship to religion, which is the basis for all morality, as religionists often like to remind us. Actually, morality as we know it was invented by Plato as part of his social engineering program, but I will cover that later in Part III of my The Great Metaphysics Conspiracy series.

We all know that Putin is an Orthodox Christian, but this was a very common feature among criminals in the USSR who would convert in prison. Upon their mass releases in the 80s, Christianity (of a kind) returned to social life, as did criminality.

This kind of mindset has also been immortalized in cult classic films like Zhmurki.

Actually, even in America, you have a lot of criminals who take their religiosity very seriously. Like all the South American gangs or, you know, all the other vibrants and lower classes who convert behind bars. Ever listen to blue grass music? It’s just poor people complaining about going to jail and about God being mad at them. Every song. Over and over.

Peasantmindset.mp3.

Now, are these gangbangers considered moral even by the absurd and contradictory definition of the word that most people accept simply because they are Christian or Nation of Islam? Could you imagine if our justice systems worked that way?

No?

Why then do people apply the same criteria for Putin? What difference does his morality make on his early crimes and poor decisions or deliberate sabotage? How does him being Christian excuse that?

Furthermore, there is reason to believe that Putin is a believer in End Times prophecies … which, morality aside, is very dangerous for anyone, especially a leader with power, to believe in.

So, in effect, the question I posed in the headline of the article is a a useless and pointless one to ask. And yet, this “morality” criterion is what informs the public’s opinion on its politicians. The peasants don’t understand geopolitics or anything, frankly, but they do consider themselves experts in morality. This is because they are invariably the most moral person that they know and therefore experts qualified to make a judgement on the subject.

The other main criterion is strength, but we will cover that in greater depth in another article soon about uprisings and political resistance. Suffice it to say that strength equates to morality in most people’s brains. So, if someone is perceived as being weak, people assume that they are also immoral. It is vitally important then that your political opponents be portrayed as weak so that the public starts feeling contempt for them.

Case in point: Senile Joe, Coughing Hillary, Rocketman, etc.

So long as you look and act like the winner, the public will forgive your many divorces and shady business dealings and the pornstars that you paid off and just about everything, frankly. That’s because losers aren’t winners and winners aren’t losers. A winner is moral by default. That’s how we know that Kiev will be taken in two weeks. Because that’s what winners do. That is, that’s what moral people do — they win in two weeks. God rewards the moral people because moral people are following God’s laws — and that’s the whole point of morality!

NOTE: this paragraph was neither a joke nor satire nor an exaggeration!

Regimes lose power when they look weak, not when they behave immorally.

So, let me ask you a few questions then:

• What are the Kremlin’s odds of remaining popular if they should happen to, oh I don’t know, lose a war?

• Does it make more sense now why nay-sayers who simply tell it like it is are imprisoned by the state?

• It seems like the state is willing to incur the risk of looking “immoral” if it means not allowing someone to run around telling the peasants that they are weak, no?

And the most important question of all:

WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO SIGN UP FOR A PAID SUB ALREADY????