[Andrew Taint's Masculinity Crisis, the Controlled Opposition Hall of Mirrors, Slavic Peasants Ate Black Sun Blinis, Don Draper Was a Fraud, Dancing Will Set Us Free, the Desert of the Real]
Speaking of living fake. It's almost a default condition for introverts, or, specifically, an introvert like me. Much of what interests me is consumed vicariously, through the doings of others. Much of what I read and watch is from the web. Working from home further isolates me, delightedly I might add, from society at large. Is my life fake? Seems real to me, but isn't that what everyone would say.
The whole covid thing of separation from the ha ha ✞🧄🧄☠ deadliness of my fellow humans, shielding behind a mask if one "had to" venture outside one's burrow, taking an experimental (or worse, intentionally harmful) inoculation not for my benefit but for others: oh, please. As a matter of practice and choice, I isolated from fellow human beings because that is my nature long before any mandate I wouldn't follow anyway, came into being. I went out when I chose, under the conditions I choose, and if that amounted to little social interaction, then that's how I want it. No one and nothing would have been convincing or guilt-producing enough to take into my body some substance that glaringly did not seem to be for my own good. I'll make that decision, thank you, not no stinkin' government bureaucrat or HR harridan.
I genuinely felt and feel sadness for people not like me who suffered badly from the wholly manufactured and fake restrictions imposed upon them, those being extroverts and the workers who had not the luxury of being laptop stay-at-homes, virtue signaling their days away. The latter I despise and scorn and would shun under any circumstances.
Sorry for the rant. Not especially on topic, but my mild to sometimes intense misanthropy sometimes needs to vent.
The imperviousness of the laptop class to the effects their policy preferences were having on the rest of society was sickening. I saw that moral vacuum up close. They hadn't once considered it, because 'those people' aren't real to them. And when I explained it, they didn't care.
This was good fun. Don was a sex addict whose view of the world and women was molded in a whore house. Andrew Taint broadcast the whore house to coomers and, as a "Christian man of god" does, fleeced lonely men out of their life savings pretending to be his cam girls.
BAP is literally a gay Romanian Jew who got brought to the US to study in an Ivy League university. Was a great podcast until the fucking BAP shilling began. I can't believe these Jews keep bamboozling everyone
I went looking for confirmation. Assuming the doxx is right the Romanian part checks out. The only support I found for 'gay' was a Red Scare pod reddit thread where some posters said 'he looks gay'.
And this leads him to smuggle pro zionist narratives into right wing discourse, along with other pro degenerate positions. Which I absolutely cannot tolerate. But, I suppose you have some reason why this doesn't matter to you. Honestly, I'm not as annoyed as when I made the above comment but hearing BAP get brought up after so much insightful discussion really threw me for a loop.
A sauce on the accusations would be great, because otherwise I'm thinking it's just some bullshit. I've been listening to BAP for a while, and have never heard these 'pro Zionist narratives' you're talking about.
Source is from Joel Davis and Keith Wood's telegram. Just go there and search "BAP" looking through the archives, they have a bunch of takedowns of him and screencaps of him supporting Zionism. The part where I called him gay is just because I have seen him say gay shit, it's not proven or anything. There IS strong evidence he is Jewish though.
Wasn't he a vaxx enjoyer? Seem to recall him getting in a fight with Morgoth over that or related subjects.
In any case I've literally never heard him shilling for Zionism. He was also very outspoken against our guys fighting for the Ukrainians, which isn't exactly consistent with the crypto-neocon thing.
So am I. Now, I think that the vaccine causes an increased chance of heart failure and is basically useless anyway, but whether you think the vaccine is good or not has nothing to with this retarded factionalism that has consumed the dissident right.
I feel BAP wrote the truth when he stated that, in spirit if not in intellect, whites have more in common with the vitality of n**g*rs than with the dull, slumbering numbness of the Chinese.
Very interesting the bit about dancing, reminds me of the disorderly long pieces of Jung-Freud on Unz.com. It's probably true we as a race are more suited for polka, tango or mazurka.
In one of his articles, he laid down the ascendancy of the Negrolatry cult: 1) Western societies get rid of religion 2) but Man needs to believe in something, science does not quite fit/is too difficult to understand for plebs 3) the most primitive forms of religion, the ones that create Gods and spirits out of the most scary phenomena such as fires or thunders, or out of the most unexplainable e.g. bears' aggressive/docile behavioural patterns 4) in those archaic religions all the kneeling and sacrificing is done in order to appease, or at least in order to be able to understand and control the scary or mysterious event of nature. 5) Common man does not deal with Nature anymore in his everyday life, but deep down perceives the Negro as this unpredictable and terrible force the constraints of contemporary post-industrial society (which substitute vicariously the laws of Nature for the primitive man) force him to deal with as the principal danger in his environment 6) Negrolatry develops as one of the facets of the malaise that is Western progressive liberalism, in the same way archaic religions took shape. There are also sacrifices made to the sacred creatures, see BLM riots, or more symbolically, cancel culture and the voluminous list of topic that is imposed on speech about the topic nowadays.
Fomenko's claims are a bit far-fetched to be honest, but recently I stumbled upon some more recent historical revisionist conspiracy: the Dark Ages going from the enthroning of Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire by Constantine, going further to more or less 1000 AD, this is a period of officially 600 years that in the opinion of the author could be compressed in much less time, perhaps 2 centuries. This is because many events we believe have happened one after the other, had really happened at the same time, or were recorded as different events while there were only one really occurring, e.g. the sack of Constantinople and then of Rome a decade later, both by Attila, are described as very similar and really should be one event only.
This stems from knowing that a lot of humanists in the Renaissance created forged treaties by ancient writers to give prestige to some point they were arguing against some other scholar, eg. see Erasmus' admitted forgery of a treatise by St. Cyprian. Also, virtually all ancient Latin texts were 'rediscovered' by Italian humanists forgotten in damp and stale attics in monasteries (or so the Humanists alleged..). As if the monks that did the copying didn't read and know anything of what they spent their lifetimes copying.
I listened through much of the podcast while taking notes and trying to focus in on the problem of *what it is men should be doing* in what you call the ‘kinetic’ realm. The most succinct formulation I came up with for men’s role is that *men create a civilized space and identify and recruit allies to defend it*.
As a clue what I mean, the common HR slogan of ‘always assume good intent’ is a toxic meme intended to prevent this rather natural process from taking place within departments of a corporation.
I would say the additional challenge is that in the 21st century the process of forming a space has be done, if at all possible, without recourse to *any* institutional or bureaucratic means. Starting a corporation, running a church with tax-exempt status, God forbid getting any form of ‘funding’ .. all of these are seen by the state as a patronage relation that entitles the state to dictate what to do within the space. I think this challenge has a deeper spiritual meaning in that the 21st century will also be the death of the corporate-managerial bureaucracy — whatever social organization survives to 2100 will be formed on completely different principles. In that sense we’re trying to redesign and rebuild an airplane while in flight before it hits the ground.
For endeavours in the online space, probably the free software / open source people have the most wretchedly thorough and educational experience in starting a project, forming a group of people, watching the resulting space get co-opted successfully or unsuccessfully by (sometimes bewilderingly) disingenuous corporate or state shills and lobbyists, or just toxic individuals.
Everything the peasants did, including singing and dancing, I can imagine, had a purpose. Dancing and spinning on the grain to husk it. Singing to the gardens to keep out the birds. So on and so forth. If the energy spent didn't have an energy return they weren't so stupid to perform it is my view. This doing things just to get high is a recent 5500 year old phenomenon that will go away once enough of the planet's resources are exhausted.
It is not Tate's fault but the judaic west itself. The femgroids are correct that toxic masculinity exists BUT it is because they have destroyed our traditional masculinity and by extent civilization itself. It is a toxic swamp so blaming Tate for being toxic is retarded.
He is the toxic avenger, irridiated filth bore of irridiated filth, again not really his fault.
Feminists would probably refer to proper masculinity as toxic, however. Their ideal is somewhere in between Tate and a soyboy, utterly tolerant of degeneracy and not really threatening but with some degree of masculinity because those women don't genuinely want a totally soft guy unless they are on birth control.
Which is precisely the utility of the tonic masculinity frame. When the only categories are negative and neutral, separating the positive and negative becomes difficult, and an inversion of values results.
Speaking of living fake. It's almost a default condition for introverts, or, specifically, an introvert like me. Much of what interests me is consumed vicariously, through the doings of others. Much of what I read and watch is from the web. Working from home further isolates me, delightedly I might add, from society at large. Is my life fake? Seems real to me, but isn't that what everyone would say.
The whole covid thing of separation from the ha ha ✞🧄🧄☠ deadliness of my fellow humans, shielding behind a mask if one "had to" venture outside one's burrow, taking an experimental (or worse, intentionally harmful) inoculation not for my benefit but for others: oh, please. As a matter of practice and choice, I isolated from fellow human beings because that is my nature long before any mandate I wouldn't follow anyway, came into being. I went out when I chose, under the conditions I choose, and if that amounted to little social interaction, then that's how I want it. No one and nothing would have been convincing or guilt-producing enough to take into my body some substance that glaringly did not seem to be for my own good. I'll make that decision, thank you, not no stinkin' government bureaucrat or HR harridan.
I genuinely felt and feel sadness for people not like me who suffered badly from the wholly manufactured and fake restrictions imposed upon them, those being extroverts and the workers who had not the luxury of being laptop stay-at-homes, virtue signaling their days away. The latter I despise and scorn and would shun under any circumstances.
Sorry for the rant. Not especially on topic, but my mild to sometimes intense misanthropy sometimes needs to vent.
The imperviousness of the laptop class to the effects their policy preferences were having on the rest of society was sickening. I saw that moral vacuum up close. They hadn't once considered it, because 'those people' aren't real to them. And when I explained it, they didn't care.
I know. I don’t know any of them personally and plan to keep it that way.
Even the story of the Potemkin Village is fake.
As is the story of the Odessa stairs, the storming of the Winter Palace and so on.
Potemkinception.
Shibboleths exposed, excoriated and destroyed - including a lot of my own. Thanks, guys. Now I'm going to go out and do something.
This was good fun. Don was a sex addict whose view of the world and women was molded in a whore house. Andrew Taint broadcast the whore house to coomers and, as a "Christian man of god" does, fleeced lonely men out of their life savings pretending to be his cam girls.
BAP is literally a gay Romanian Jew who got brought to the US to study in an Ivy League university. Was a great podcast until the fucking BAP shilling began. I can't believe these Jews keep bamboozling everyone
I honestly didn't know that he was a Romanian gay Jew.
I went looking for confirmation. Assuming the doxx is right the Romanian part checks out. The only support I found for 'gay' was a Red Scare pod reddit thread where some posters said 'he looks gay'.
... and?
And this leads him to smuggle pro zionist narratives into right wing discourse, along with other pro degenerate positions. Which I absolutely cannot tolerate. But, I suppose you have some reason why this doesn't matter to you. Honestly, I'm not as annoyed as when I made the above comment but hearing BAP get brought up after so much insightful discussion really threw me for a loop.
A sauce on the accusations would be great, because otherwise I'm thinking it's just some bullshit. I've been listening to BAP for a while, and have never heard these 'pro Zionist narratives' you're talking about.
Source is from Joel Davis and Keith Wood's telegram. Just go there and search "BAP" looking through the archives, they have a bunch of takedowns of him and screencaps of him supporting Zionism. The part where I called him gay is just because I have seen him say gay shit, it's not proven or anything. There IS strong evidence he is Jewish though.
>Keith Woods
Wasn't he a vaxx enjoyer? Seem to recall him getting in a fight with Morgoth over that or related subjects.
In any case I've literally never heard him shilling for Zionism. He was also very outspoken against our guys fighting for the Ukrainians, which isn't exactly consistent with the crypto-neocon thing.
>Wasn't he a vaxx enjoyer
So am I. Now, I think that the vaccine causes an increased chance of heart failure and is basically useless anyway, but whether you think the vaccine is good or not has nothing to with this retarded factionalism that has consumed the dissident right.
Can you link the documentary you mentioned?
I feel BAP wrote the truth when he stated that, in spirit if not in intellect, whites have more in common with the vitality of n**g*rs than with the dull, slumbering numbness of the Chinese.
Very interesting the bit about dancing, reminds me of the disorderly long pieces of Jung-Freud on Unz.com. It's probably true we as a race are more suited for polka, tango or mazurka.
In one of his articles, he laid down the ascendancy of the Negrolatry cult: 1) Western societies get rid of religion 2) but Man needs to believe in something, science does not quite fit/is too difficult to understand for plebs 3) the most primitive forms of religion, the ones that create Gods and spirits out of the most scary phenomena such as fires or thunders, or out of the most unexplainable e.g. bears' aggressive/docile behavioural patterns 4) in those archaic religions all the kneeling and sacrificing is done in order to appease, or at least in order to be able to understand and control the scary or mysterious event of nature. 5) Common man does not deal with Nature anymore in his everyday life, but deep down perceives the Negro as this unpredictable and terrible force the constraints of contemporary post-industrial society (which substitute vicariously the laws of Nature for the primitive man) force him to deal with as the principal danger in his environment 6) Negrolatry develops as one of the facets of the malaise that is Western progressive liberalism, in the same way archaic religions took shape. There are also sacrifices made to the sacred creatures, see BLM riots, or more symbolically, cancel culture and the voluminous list of topic that is imposed on speech about the topic nowadays.
https://www.unz.com/jfreud/how-negrolatry-or-afromania-among-silly-whites-parallels-the-transformation-of-worship-from-pagan-cults-to-judaism-to-christianity-the-problems-of-white-psychristianity-nature-vs-n/
Fomenko's claims are a bit far-fetched to be honest, but recently I stumbled upon some more recent historical revisionist conspiracy: the Dark Ages going from the enthroning of Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire by Constantine, going further to more or less 1000 AD, this is a period of officially 600 years that in the opinion of the author could be compressed in much less time, perhaps 2 centuries. This is because many events we believe have happened one after the other, had really happened at the same time, or were recorded as different events while there were only one really occurring, e.g. the sack of Constantinople and then of Rome a decade later, both by Attila, are described as very similar and really should be one event only.
This stems from knowing that a lot of humanists in the Renaissance created forged treaties by ancient writers to give prestige to some point they were arguing against some other scholar, eg. see Erasmus' admitted forgery of a treatise by St. Cyprian. Also, virtually all ancient Latin texts were 'rediscovered' by Italian humanists forgotten in damp and stale attics in monasteries (or so the Humanists alleged..). As if the monks that did the copying didn't read and know anything of what they spent their lifetimes copying.
https://www.unz.com/article/how-long-was-the-first-millenium/
About as masculine as there can be
Russian forward
https://odysee.com/@Velyaminov:a/Russians-go-forward:6
Greetings. I'm not a podcast guy. I prefer to read. Are there transcriptions for these podcasts? Thankyou. H
I listened through much of the podcast while taking notes and trying to focus in on the problem of *what it is men should be doing* in what you call the ‘kinetic’ realm. The most succinct formulation I came up with for men’s role is that *men create a civilized space and identify and recruit allies to defend it*.
As a clue what I mean, the common HR slogan of ‘always assume good intent’ is a toxic meme intended to prevent this rather natural process from taking place within departments of a corporation.
I would say the additional challenge is that in the 21st century the process of forming a space has be done, if at all possible, without recourse to *any* institutional or bureaucratic means. Starting a corporation, running a church with tax-exempt status, God forbid getting any form of ‘funding’ .. all of these are seen by the state as a patronage relation that entitles the state to dictate what to do within the space. I think this challenge has a deeper spiritual meaning in that the 21st century will also be the death of the corporate-managerial bureaucracy — whatever social organization survives to 2100 will be formed on completely different principles. In that sense we’re trying to redesign and rebuild an airplane while in flight before it hits the ground.
For endeavours in the online space, probably the free software / open source people have the most wretchedly thorough and educational experience in starting a project, forming a group of people, watching the resulting space get co-opted successfully or unsuccessfully by (sometimes bewilderingly) disingenuous corporate or state shills and lobbyists, or just toxic individuals.
Everything the peasants did, including singing and dancing, I can imagine, had a purpose. Dancing and spinning on the grain to husk it. Singing to the gardens to keep out the birds. So on and so forth. If the energy spent didn't have an energy return they weren't so stupid to perform it is my view. This doing things just to get high is a recent 5500 year old phenomenon that will go away once enough of the planet's resources are exhausted.
Hahahaha! I think you guys are eating too many candy bars!
I love the reference to all the people, like all of us internet users, sitting on our ass thinking we are doing something.
If you are serious about separating humans is to suggest planting a garden. You will cause a gaging response in the ass sitters.
It is not Tate's fault but the judaic west itself. The femgroids are correct that toxic masculinity exists BUT it is because they have destroyed our traditional masculinity and by extent civilization itself. It is a toxic swamp so blaming Tate for being toxic is retarded.
He is the toxic avenger, irridiated filth bore of irridiated filth, again not really his fault.
Feminists would probably refer to proper masculinity as toxic, however. Their ideal is somewhere in between Tate and a soyboy, utterly tolerant of degeneracy and not really threatening but with some degree of masculinity because those women don't genuinely want a totally soft guy unless they are on birth control.
Which is precisely the utility of the tonic masculinity frame. When the only categories are negative and neutral, separating the positive and negative becomes difficult, and an inversion of values results.
This is a re-enactment of an authentic 19th century quadrille (square dance). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElptopGToUk
Where can we find your Russian podcast? I am very interested in manufactured folklore.
https://boosty.to/cdpodcast