Beside Greta Thunberg once stood Jamie Margolin. She founded the Zero Hour climate activist organisation at 15. She managed to raise money and start legal action. However the limelight was placed on Greta because another Jewish and lesbian activist would have disgusted half of the world and exposed climate activism for what it is : the latest scheme for large scale money grabbing from the hapless Western middle class. Greta looked innocent and deeply convinced. She is a good cultural reference.
You really have to wonder what Putin’s goal in this all is, after all, he’s introducing the new Digital Ruble - the Russian Central Bank Digital Currency - the same thing Biden and the Democrats are trying to put in place in the US (and so for probably all WEF-compliant governments in the world.) Perhaps the point is to ramp up the chaos, the fear, the uncertainty, and the discontent/distrust, so that the new system of doing things will be accepted without question - if you want life to be easier, just get with the program, comrade/citizen!
World events are again following a significant phase of a long term plan with supposed enemies actually cooperating towards a one world government. I believe that the west is not the overall controlling power, as it does not act in its best interests in many aspects. A power not serving any country, but a world control system in control of everything already, is tightening its grasp over all peoples. resources and money etc.
Oh no, another carbon lie debunked! Who's going to tell Greta she has wasted her life? Will it be Gates, or Soros, or Fauci, or ....no-one? All those highly educated scientists who should have known this stuff, but didn't tell us, were they too busy grubbing for grants?
When you insert a sample into a laboratory infra red spectrometer, you have to hold your breath. Why?
Because even one breath contains enough CO2 to cause an annoying absorbance peak. Then you have to open the machine, ventilate the sample chamber and run it again!
So they're telling us that part of a human exhalation can cause substantial abaorbance over a 100mm path length, yet atmospheric CO2 is not saturated over a multi kilometer path length? I don't even....
YES the world could follow the example of Russia regarding reducing carbon footprints and they could start with Washington DC.... they are hypocrites if they don't
E' una cosa che ormai non mi fa dormire la notte da diversi mesi, da prima comunque de mio abbonamento. Se Putin è una costruzione americana, in diretta relazione con la cabala liberal-mafiosa dei vari Sobcak/FSB, un uomo di paglia che si rifiuta di mobilitare l'esercito affinché le spese belliche degli americani e la deindustrializzazione interna possa realizzare i presupposi di quella famosa convergenza con il capitalismo Occidentale, proprio non capisco perché nella guerra in Ossezia nel 2008 il contenzioso si risolse in pochi giorni? Eppure lì c'erano di mezzo gli stessi americani ed ebrei? Non posso credere che un esercito, che tutti ricordano d'impostazione staliniana, possa essere cambiato così tanto. E soprattutto non posso credere che, in nome della famosa convergenza, lo stesso discorso di Putin a Monaco nel 2007 sia stato solo un esercizio retorico, in grado di eguagliare in perfarmance i siparietti di Eltstin con Clinton.
Mi risponda! Abbia un poco di pietà per un vecchio stalinista in pena.
So it’s a “ mostly peaceful” bombing campaign. Of course they fail every time, have you seen any reports of Russian military casualties or deaths or losses at all? No need to be depressed though, it’s not your responsibility to be worried about it. In fact it’s always been this way, we can see it better now thanks to the internet.
If it’s any consolation here is a Bible quote.
Revelation 3:9 “They are of the synagogue of Satan they say they are Jews but they are not, they are liars “
Reading these articles makes me depressed... Do you think we can expect an end to the Not-War when Donald Trump gets elected? He said he wanted to end it. It might be at least some hope...
I doubt it, since past is usually prologue in politics. Lest we forget that it was under Trump that Ukraine received its first shipments of Javelin anti-tank missiles, something even his predecessor refused to do.
Sometimes with Trump, it seems to be the last advisor he spoke to that sets policy. Trump appointed people like Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley and John Bolton in his first term. His approach seemed to be, let's have a big tent and debate our differences. But his neocon appointees actively sabotaged his agenda. If Trump manages to get a Republican majority congress, he will be in a much stronger position than in his first term. He has bragged that he could end the conflict with a phone call, which he undoubtedly could if he were willing to sign a formal treaty that the US would always veto NATO membership for Ukraine. The big question is, will he? Trump's speeches show no particular insight into the Ukraine issues but a conversation with Putin could probably expose him to the possibilities.
My suggestion (not that anyone would or should listen to me) is that Russia begin some major offenses prior to the US election. That would serve as a bargaining chip allowing Trump to save face if they negotiate a peace based on real Russian objectives.
Beside Greta Thunberg once stood Jamie Margolin. She founded the Zero Hour climate activist organisation at 15. She managed to raise money and start legal action. However the limelight was placed on Greta because another Jewish and lesbian activist would have disgusted half of the world and exposed climate activism for what it is : the latest scheme for large scale money grabbing from the hapless Western middle class. Greta looked innocent and deeply convinced. She is a good cultural reference.
You really have to wonder what Putin’s goal in this all is, after all, he’s introducing the new Digital Ruble - the Russian Central Bank Digital Currency - the same thing Biden and the Democrats are trying to put in place in the US (and so for probably all WEF-compliant governments in the world.) Perhaps the point is to ramp up the chaos, the fear, the uncertainty, and the discontent/distrust, so that the new system of doing things will be accepted without question - if you want life to be easier, just get with the program, comrade/citizen!
World events are again following a significant phase of a long term plan with supposed enemies actually cooperating towards a one world government. I believe that the west is not the overall controlling power, as it does not act in its best interests in many aspects. A power not serving any country, but a world control system in control of everything already, is tightening its grasp over all peoples. resources and money etc.
Oh no, another carbon lie debunked! Who's going to tell Greta she has wasted her life? Will it be Gates, or Soros, or Fauci, or ....no-one? All those highly educated scientists who should have known this stuff, but didn't tell us, were they too busy grubbing for grants?
https://www.sott.net/article/493240-Top-study-confirms-carbon-dioxide-has-zero-impact-on-global-warming
When you insert a sample into a laboratory infra red spectrometer, you have to hold your breath. Why?
Because even one breath contains enough CO2 to cause an annoying absorbance peak. Then you have to open the machine, ventilate the sample chamber and run it again!
So they're telling us that part of a human exhalation can cause substantial abaorbance over a 100mm path length, yet atmospheric CO2 is not saturated over a multi kilometer path length? I don't even....
Russia is winning 80% BIGLIER
Don't worry the Trump train is coming round the bend.........
Coming, or going?
YES the world could follow the example of Russia regarding reducing carbon footprints and they could start with Washington DC.... they are hypocrites if they don't
E' una cosa che ormai non mi fa dormire la notte da diversi mesi, da prima comunque de mio abbonamento. Se Putin è una costruzione americana, in diretta relazione con la cabala liberal-mafiosa dei vari Sobcak/FSB, un uomo di paglia che si rifiuta di mobilitare l'esercito affinché le spese belliche degli americani e la deindustrializzazione interna possa realizzare i presupposi di quella famosa convergenza con il capitalismo Occidentale, proprio non capisco perché nella guerra in Ossezia nel 2008 il contenzioso si risolse in pochi giorni? Eppure lì c'erano di mezzo gli stessi americani ed ebrei? Non posso credere che un esercito, che tutti ricordano d'impostazione staliniana, possa essere cambiato così tanto. E soprattutto non posso credere che, in nome della famosa convergenza, lo stesso discorso di Putin a Monaco nel 2007 sia stato solo un esercizio retorico, in grado di eguagliare in perfarmance i siparietti di Eltstin con Clinton.
Mi risponda! Abbia un poco di pietà per un vecchio stalinista in pena.
So it’s a “ mostly peaceful” bombing campaign. Of course they fail every time, have you seen any reports of Russian military casualties or deaths or losses at all? No need to be depressed though, it’s not your responsibility to be worried about it. In fact it’s always been this way, we can see it better now thanks to the internet.
If it’s any consolation here is a Bible quote.
Revelation 3:9 “They are of the synagogue of Satan they say they are Jews but they are not, they are liars “
Reading these articles makes me depressed... Do you think we can expect an end to the Not-War when Donald Trump gets elected? He said he wanted to end it. It might be at least some hope...
I doubt it, since past is usually prologue in politics. Lest we forget that it was under Trump that Ukraine received its first shipments of Javelin anti-tank missiles, something even his predecessor refused to do.
Sometimes with Trump, it seems to be the last advisor he spoke to that sets policy. Trump appointed people like Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley and John Bolton in his first term. His approach seemed to be, let's have a big tent and debate our differences. But his neocon appointees actively sabotaged his agenda. If Trump manages to get a Republican majority congress, he will be in a much stronger position than in his first term. He has bragged that he could end the conflict with a phone call, which he undoubtedly could if he were willing to sign a formal treaty that the US would always veto NATO membership for Ukraine. The big question is, will he? Trump's speeches show no particular insight into the Ukraine issues but a conversation with Putin could probably expose him to the possibilities.
My suggestion (not that anyone would or should listen to me) is that Russia begin some major offenses prior to the US election. That would serve as a bargaining chip allowing Trump to save face if they negotiate a peace based on real Russian objectives.