44 Comments
User's avatar
Gandalph56's avatar

You are right on the money, calling liberalism terrorism. I would go a step further and say that every naive adherent is a potential terrorist in the making. The ideology is fundamentally intolerant. You find that out real quick if you dare to criticise any one its sacred deities. Take climate change for example. By the way you can throw many if not all of the isms into the same bucket, conservatism, neo-conservatism and so on. They all worship the territorial monopoly on coercion and violence also know as the state. The state is their sugar daddy. They cannot exist without it.

Expand full comment
Dionysios Dionou's avatar

Truth 100%. I've always said, "scratch a liberal and you'll find a Bolshevik". To my mind "liberals" are Bolsheviks with no balls. Bolsheviks were and are killers murdering psychopaths. The "liberal" doesn't have the balls to shoot you, or knife you, instead he/she (so many are he/she's aren't they these days) kills you though legislation enacting laws that destroy and wreck the society and culture. The liberal idiots not realizing they too will get it in the neck when it all comes crashing down. Look at every major city in the USA governed by liberal leftists everywhere their is collapse poverty high crime and a decline in the quality of life. And when these largely "minority" dominated city governments mess up just pull out the race card and cry like a bitch. As a friend of mine living in the Baltimore area likes to say, "The mayor is black, the police and fire commissioners are black, and 80% of the city council is black (the rest largely leftish Jews) but when things don't work it's all whitey's fault." White as in white Christian gentiles, of course. This is what the liberal left does they infiltrate often legitimate movements and coopt them. Like Soros AKA Schwartz funding DA campaigns, or shake down racketeers clothed in Marxism like Saul Alinsky. What happens during November election time will be telling, and will give us all a better idea as to what we can expect over the next year or two. the war currently being waged against Russia is a battle for mankind and the future of civilization. If Russia doesn't see it through victoriously it will be goodbye to civilization and in particular the Caucasian people and a barbarism will be installed of the like never before seen in world history. The only consolation will be seeing western "liberals" suffering too. Richly deserved the trouble is we'll all be in the same cesspool and it won't be easy to drain.

Expand full comment
Jeff76's avatar

I've come to realize through COVID that liberals are dangerous pacifist aggressors who will embrace fascism to coddle their blind, fragile beliefs. And for a long time could hide beneath a veneer of feigned compassion and democracy.

I agree, the next few months of elections and Ukraine are going to be very telling.

Expand full comment
Dionysios Dionou's avatar

Liberals as I said are Bolsheviks with no balls. I always found it amusing during the BLM AKA Burn Loot Murder and Antifa riots that the people thinking they will take over a nation would shoot themselves in the foot literally, and were untrained, undisciplined and unintelligent. Not to mention had rap sheets including spousal abuse and pedophilia child molestation. So much for selfless revolutionaries for people's liberation. These clowns couldn't fight their way out of a subway toilet or operate an elevator. Any tactical police squad could disperse them. But most cities don't have such a squad any longer. Or they were told to stand down and some assholes commanders actually took a knee. Disgusting and unacceptable they should've be shit canned. Liberals are totalitarians without the blood lust and ability to inflict physical damage simply stated nasty self important smug weaklings. So they do it through legislation and then virtue signal each other how "progressive" they are. Amazing how such policies and beliefs can be called "progress" shows the brain fogs they clowns live with.

Yes let's see how the "elections" turn out assuming they actually happen. I used to work at the polls. I could tell you plenty of stories and how I had to 86 liberals that played games.

the world is in a pivotal junction we'll see how it will pivot very soon.

Expand full comment
Sim1776's avatar

As someone intimately familiar with Baltimore, your friend is spot on. I could go on and on about it. The cognitive dissonance of the. White Liberals here would be hilarious if I didn't have to live with the results of the virtue signaling.

Expand full comment
Dionysios Dionou's avatar

Thank I knew he was he's a very sharp guy. What a tragedy that all major cities in the USA have become urban cesspools. Mini versions of Rhodesia and South Africa. And the more compounded tragedy is that even blacks in NYC are fed up with the so called "bail bond reform" and think it's insane. This shows that the white bribed and/or blackmailed politicians have a deliberate agenda by enacting these laws and policies.

It's not in the best interest of the people certainly not for European Americans and their families. Liberal democracy is such a canard that the mass of liberals are clueless of it's hidden agendas. Which is to destroy European Americans culturally and literally this makes it easier for the oligarchs to control the third world masses that are easily manipulated and bought off.

We need a Freikorps and a nationalist political party to clean house and convince the "down trodden" so called, to stop the crying game and to get on board with a revived nation.

Expand full comment
Jerome V's avatar

Antiwhites pushing for White Erasure.

Explains a lot. NoWhiteGuilt.org for more.

Expand full comment
Dionysios Dionou's avatar

One of the tragedies of white people is that they engage in causes and enact policies that are detrimental to their best interests.

You'll see white's adopt non-white babies to be chic and virtue signaling. when do nonwhites adopt white babies?

I think this has to do with a warped interpretation of Christianity and the guilt trips laid on younger whites in schools especially universities. The public schools are to busy sexualizing children. This is how bad it's gotten. I'll check out the link. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Jerome V's avatar

"One of the tragedies of white people is that they engage in causes and enact policies that are detrimental to their best interests." Most definitely they have been doing so.

Questions are: Why do we do this? What can be done about it?

These questions deserve the attention of our best minds.

How much of this error/blindness/weakness is built into our (inherited) bio-spirit?

How much is due to meme pathogens (poison ideas implanted in our subconscious by victimizers)?

We can see that modern Christianity contains meme pathogens. Was the Christianity of the most recent "Golden Age of the West" free of meme pathogens, or did it contain poison seeds that are bearing fruit today?

These topics deserve deeper exploration.

I pray we sort out the truth and go free of the chains that hobble us.

Expand full comment
John Carter's avatar

Destroying infrastructure in a declared war isn't terrorism, but of course, NATO hasn't technically declared war, meaning these actions are being conducted under a passive-aggressive veil of minimally plausibly deniable secrecy. So, yes, terrorism.

Russia's response will be interesting to see.

Expand full comment
Sim1776's avatar

There is footage of the explosion indicating that the tanker car was struck by a missile. I doubt the Ukrainians have the stealth drone tech to penetrate russias air defense zone that deeply. It certainly makes the timing of the Dugina assassination denial by the US on Thursday very interesting.

Expand full comment
Jerome V's avatar

Curious that the actual villains seem to be immune from retaliation for their crimes. Leads me to wonder...

Expand full comment
paul scott's avatar

Jerome . The response has to be ferocious but measured. There is still dialogue occurring with the Pentagon I think. Everything depends on the mood of the frussian people to take losses.

Expand full comment
Jerome V's avatar

Appreciate the perspective. This stuff is above my pay grade. Vox Day wrote: "Russia has been doing an awful lot of not-responding of late. The Russian people are starting to get angry about all the not-responding. This makes me conclude that whatever the Russians are planning, it’s probably going to be something even bigger than the February surprise of the special military operation, because this was a direct attack on Russia."

https://voxday.net/2022/10/08/russia-blows-up-bridge-to-crimea/

Expand full comment
Al DuClur's avatar

You are right in calling liberalism terrorism. After all, the DOJ and FBI are fielding swat teams to arrest their opponents for non violent offenses and torturing dissidents. And that is nothing compared to what liberal democracy does to the civilians of countries targeted by the US as needing democracy and rule based order.

This shows why Putin's and American conservatives' belief in one-sidedly playing by the rules never achieves their stated goals. Putin is carefully playing by the rules of Russia and international law while liberal democracy just makes up any rules they want. They see cautious people as weak and it emboldens the lunatics.

Expand full comment
Allan's avatar

They see jurisprudes as sissies and clowns, and they are correct.

Expand full comment
Frantic's avatar

This is what happened: https://southfront.org/details-of-terrorist-attack-on-crimean-bridge-revealed-nato-appears-involved/

Explosives packaged in Bulgaria inside a ton of plastic wraps for food so apparently X-rays cannot detect them. Shipped to Georgia, loaded on two trucks, drivers unaware, destination Russia. Probably also included inside the wraps was a geolocator to track the trucks' itinerary.

Expand full comment
David Parker's avatar

Yes, but apparently there were also explosives on the bridge span. The truck did not bring down the bridge span. Also the explosion was timed to be beside the stopped train pulling tank cars loaded with fuel. The terrorists had control of the train signals. It was not a Ukrainian op. I read MI6, but I believe MOSSAD and CIA because I do not believe the Brits have the technical capacity to pull off placing 450 Kg of explosive on the bridge span. Surely there are Russian coast guard patrols along the bridge, surely there are sensors in the water along the bridge.

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

Revenge is a dish best served cold. I am certain that America's military is on high alert today. Putin has been outspoken in saying he will retaliate bigly if the motherland is attacked. Two months ago, Darya Dugina was assassinated. Last month, terrorists bombed the pipeline. This week, terrorists attacked the bridge.

I am confident that the policy makers (Obama/Rice/Klain/HRC) in the White House are hoping to provoke Russia into WW III before the 118th congress is seated.

I just hope Putin holds off until November 8 before destroying Kiev.

Expand full comment
Rurik Skywalker's avatar

They've been routinely hitting targets within Russia though.

Expand full comment
Sim1776's avatar

Dont forget the false flag potential here either.

Expand full comment
David Parker's avatar

Not to deny your take on "liberalism" which is simply what Satan's disciples do, but read Dmitry Orlov to keep things in perspective:

http://thesaker.is/a-nice-bridge-you-got-there/

Expand full comment
Larry Cox's avatar

Due to my education in the English language and the Tone Scale, I must protest the use of the word "liberal" to describe such people. Of course, they might willingly use it to describe themselves as in "Liberal Democracy" or "Liberal Party" but I am speaking of liitle "L" liberal.

I know and use the word to mean an approach to life characterized by being "open to new ideas, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; not bound by traditional thinking." However, it is difficult for most people who can be "liberal" in their personal, social or intellectual lives and remain so in politics. Politics rarely raises its head above the level of Antagonism, and in addition, people who are truly liberal are few and far between and for the most part would avoid politics with a ten foot pole. That leaves the term "liberal" in politics, basically up for grabs. And who often graps it? The snivelling and chronic Covertly Hostile, who smile and shake your hand while their paid lackey sneaks up from behind and thrusts a knife in your back.

Now if you on this blog and when writing about politics want to insist that "liberals" or Liberals are a bunch of deceitful cowards who like to keep armed guards around their properties because of all the secret crimes they have committed, that's fine. But I must attempt to defend my language and the word as it has been used in the materials I have studied and that thousands of others have also studied.

Other commentators (mostly "conservative") prefer to distinguish between Liberal and The Left. We are all familiar with the convention of locating Communism and Socialism on the Left. Currently Progressivism (in America) also resides there, along with Critical Theorists. None of these ideologies, howeve,r, are particularly liberal.

I am reminded that when push comes to shove in politics - particularly international politics - strong arm tactics often prevail. That is, the (mostly) angry generals get their way and we go to war instead of initiate a Third Party Investigation. People who you would think would be pro-peace throw in the towel and pull out the guns - or the armed guards. This has to do with the effect that the threat of physical violence has on the human psyche as much as anything. Yet, a "true" liberal would continue to insist on a rational and measured approach to the attack. Very few such people exist today.

Expand full comment
Cruelnunusual's avatar

Kiev probably got some Reddit rambos to drive the truck across the bridge thinking they were going to retrieve some female warriors.

Expand full comment
Colbert's avatar

for the 1st time since 24 of february, I start to doubt about the Russian victory.

Expand full comment
Colbert's avatar

OT but 2 good telegram channels

https://t.me/s/akashevarova

https://t.me/s/komissarischezaet

It change fom Shaker/Martyanov/Larry Johnson's copium

Expand full comment
Colbert's avatar

***your ideological fore-bearers were terrorists***

ABSOLUTELY TRUE.

The 1st one was Thomas Cromwell

The 2nd was another Cromell

The 3rd ones were the crazy Jacobins

Expand full comment
David Parker's avatar

Oliver Cromwell was the best thing to happen to England ever. He kept the Roman Catholic demons from controlling England and established the ethical government that saved England from the demonic mob revolutionary fervor that destroyed France during the reign of terror. The English people were able to reform without the bloody massacres of the French who were indoctrinated by Roman Catholicism to massacre Christians. There were no Christians left in France to prevent the Satanists from their pagan slaughters.

Expand full comment
Anzhelika's avatar

I don’t understand why is Russia not responding back with any decisive action. Surely, it’s not incapable of it? But after Russia started compulsory vaccination of mobilized citizens now that coronavirus has been long proven to be nothing deadly (to healthy young adults especially), I’m confused and don’t even know what to root for anymore, except world peace utopia.

Expand full comment
Sim1776's avatar

The whole point of this exercise is to provoke Russia and/or bring about regime change in Moscow. The Ukies are just useful idiots in this proxy war. Russians make western Ukraine unlivable (ie dropping the electric grid) like they should have and it's Putler Man Bad then GAE can justify more money laundering aid or an escalation. If Putin does nothing, he looks weak and the natives get restless. The GAE playbook loves "heads, we win; tails, you lose." The Liberals only have the righteousness of beating the Nazis to fall back on. Reading the "Putin is the new Hitler" articles are just blatant agitprop. A small glimmer of hope is that most of the articles allowing comments have many calling the author out as a shill for the Narrative.

Something that has been bothering me lately is the Chinese. Perhaps someone wiser than me has some insight here but I smell a rat. The CCP was super-cozy with Globohomo for a long time. They've bought most of the Uniparty politicians. Where's the ROI? Why aren't the Chicoms exposing the corrupt Bidens that they've bought if they are truly threatened by GAE? Why are the US and Canada allowing the CCP to open police stations in their countries? Why is it that China always beta tests oppressive technologies like Social Credit that Globohomo admits is part of the future? If the CCP is so nationalist and anti-Globohomo, why allow the WEF to open offices and hold conferences in their country? The CCP is godless; an ersatz Confucianism is used to generate obedience. I fear ultimately the CCP will betray Russia.

Expand full comment
Blue Eyes Huwhyte Dragon's avatar

Off-topic, but when will your book on the case for Authoritarianism be out?

Expand full comment
Rurik Skywalker's avatar

I'll try setting up self publishing today now that I have an account with a western bank again.

Expand full comment