Someone is lying about something. And seeing as Kiev is keeping quiet about all of this, we can narrow down our list of suspects of who is fibbing, now can’t we? There is a problem with the dates that we have been given. Something doesn’t add up.
So, there is one version of the events provided to us by Oleg Tsarev. Tsarev, you will recall (I hope) was sent along for the ride with the Kiev expedition and was supposed to play some important, but still-undefined role (he ain’t tellin’!) should the operation’s goals, whatever they were, be fulfilled.
Here:
The demonstrated draft of the Istanbul Treaty was dated April 15, 2022. Earlier media reported that it was initialed on March 29. That is, the date that we see on the contract is already after the withdrawal of the Russian army from Kiev and after Bucha.
This date indicated on the document raises many questions. Either the logical chain of events that the treaty was signed, Russia withdrew its troops, Ukraine staged Bucha, Ukraine withdrew from the treaty, does not reflect all the nuances. Or the date in the agreement is incorrect, or negotiations continued after the withdrawal of Russian troops from Kiev.
The explanation given by the Kremlin was: treaty signed, Russia withdrew, Bucha + Boris Johnson flies in, Kiev trashes treaty.
But the date of the signature is April 15, 2022 which was after the pull-out.
The most interesting thing is that according to the information that I received from Ukraine, everything happened exactly as reported in the Russian media. First, an agreement was reached, and Russia largely agreed to the Ukrainian proposals, with the exception of some main issues, Russia accepted a version of the Ukrainian treaty on March 29, withdrew troops from near Kiev, after which Bucha was staged, Boris Johnson arrived in Kiev (April 7), and Ukraine withdrew from the treaty unilaterally. And the withdrawal of troops from near Kyiv was, as Peskov said, a gesture of goodwill. From myself I will add - a gesture of goodwill, but in accordance with preliminary agreements. Just the final version was signed on April 15th.
It also became known that the document is called the "Treaty on Permanent Neutrality and Security Guarantees of Ukraine." The neutrality of Ukraine is mentioned in the first paragraph of the first article. The next paragraph says that the guarantor states recognize, respect and guarantee the status of Ukraine as a permanently neutral state, they are obliged to ensure that this status is observed. Russia, the USA, France, Great Britain and China are named as guarantor countries in the preamble. Ukraine "undertakes not to carry out activities that would be contrary to the international legal status of permanent neutrality." The agreement was supposed to be signed by Russia, Ukraine and all guarantor countries.
I have attached a table with figures on Ukraine's commitments to reduce the size of its armed forces.
It could be a simple omission, that is, Putin neglected to mention that negotiations continued after the pull-out leading to a final signature on April 15.
Possible, maybe even plausible.
But let us consider the official narrative for why things fell through. Are we really to believe that Putin and his administration were fooled YET AGAIN, for literally the 6 millionth time?
And a follow-up question:
Will the donkey-brained peasants ever get tired of this excuse, ever?
Lest we forget, the justification for the SMO was Putin saying that Kiev and the West were “agreement-incapable”. Now, I don’t disagree with this assessment - these people can’t be trusted, obviously. And yet, despite this, Moscow went ahead and tried to reach another agreement with them, which again, backfired spectacularly, just as expected.
It begs the question: are Putin and his friends (and supporters) literally retarded?
Note: I use the term “donkey-brained” deliberately because most of my casual readers are Christians who worship a donkey-headed deity named Set/Yahweh, and so, you see, they truly deserve the designation.
Also, perhaps, we are missing some crucial info that the politicians neglected to give us.
So far, we know that 1) there is something strange going on with these dates. At the very least, Putin and friends neglected to mention some detail to explain the date discrepancy. It could be an honest mistake or oversight, sure. Or, it could be a thread to pull on to unravel some unsavory reality. Then we also have 2) Lukashenko’s contention that Moscow wanted to basically buy Donbass and Crimea from Kiev as a kind of compromise that justified the SMO, prevented escalation, and also saved face by throwing money at the problem. It was a papering over which should have placated the Kremlin’s esteemed Western partners somehow. And, finally, we know that despite Kiev once again betraying Moscow, 3) the Kremlin spent all summer making new deals with them involving the surrender of Snake Island, the grain and ammonia deals, which were also reneged on in due time. Who would have thought!
Anyone with a nose for the truth is forced to admit that something very strange indeed is going on here!!!
And, as Mr. Slavsquat has eloquently stated, the new revelations have also proven that the old 5D theories were TOTALLY BUNK:
ALSO: If Putin is to be believed, Russia’s withdrawal from Kiev and other regions in April 2022 means the following: 1. The fabled “Battle of Kiev” (hailed as a mighty Ukrainian Victory) was mostly a myth, and 2. THERE WAS NO 5D RUSSIA “FEINT”. I’M SORRY BUT THAT WAS TOTAL BALONEY NONSENSE.
It does beg the question then: what was the point of the Kiev offensive? I have alleged that it was clearly a coup attempt that failed because of Medvedchuk telling tall tales and selling his own people out to the SBU.
Frankly, is there even an alternative explanation out there at this point?
No seriously. If so, what is it?
…
..
.
God, the 5D people are such filthy, disgusting liars. Yes, I’m talking about you Simpletonius and Fat Serge. The presser and the recent official statements have exposed you as such. But the internet peasants are so STUPID and FAT and DONKEY-BRAINED that they do not remember what their soothsayers and prophets were claiming a year ago. They do not even understand that Putin’s recent words have totally debunked years of work of all the big name commentators and they are too emotionally invested in lies to see/hear the truth!
At this point, I half-expect them to denounce Putin for doubting and discrediting Putin’s plan!!!
Actually, I doff my hat to the snake oil salesmen. The donkey-brained masses deserve to be fooled. You lot are truly doing Yahweh’s work peddling them the lies that they so willingly accept. Good on you. Raise their hopes a bit more so that the subsequent dashing really stings.
**
Want to prove that you don’t have donkey brains? Sign up as a paid patron of the blog today and receive your official certificate (taxes and shipping apply) in the mail tomorrow!!!
Ever find yourself losing a debate with your friends? Whip out this bad boy and force them to concede that they are DUMBER and more DONKEY-BRAINED than you:
No, but seriously, I’m one paid sub away from calling off the terror campaign against my own readers.
You won’t get a certificate proving you don’t have “donkey brains” but you will get access to a book I wrote about why Authoritarianism is good and Democracy is bad. You can read it if you like, I don’t care. I’ve earned that 1k in monthly income either way.
Go ahead and sign up now.
Seriously.
Be an adult already.
Let’s just get this over with and move on.
Dear Mr. Rolo, allow me to add another thought I just had about all this... are you ready?...
WHY WASN'T THIS DEAL PUBLICIZED TO THE WHOLE WORLD BEFORE MOSCOW PULLED OUT ITS TROOPS? WHY DIDN'T MOSCOW DEMAND THIS?
Surely that would have been Russia's best "insurance policy"? Before moving a single troop a single inch, Zelensky must ascend a podium and announce that a deal had been (at least tentatively??) reached?
I get that the Bucha thing was probably designed to make it politically impossible for Kiev to ultimately honor the agreement, BUT STILL. It would have been A LOT more difficult to pull the plug on the deal, if it had already been made public. Like, even if Russia was accused of war crimes, the Kremlin could have agreed to a UN probe, etc. etc., blah blah blah.
Am I missing something here? Because I just don't understand why this didn't happen. WHERE WAS THE INSURANCE POLICY? Honestly, the only answer I have to these questions is that Russia was NOT negotiating from a position of strength, and had already realized that the SMO was lost by the end of March 2022 (since it wasn't supposed to be an actual military conquest; it was a Crimea-style military psy-op that failed spectacularly, and was launched without any Plan B).
What do you think, Lord Rolo? HELP ME UNDERSTAND.
Hi Rolo, one more (final) sub you need? Wow, finally you will stop “begging” for subs…still: I and some like minded humans appreciate your work and specific perspectivism on the situation at hand…just keep on doing this excellent work!😎