Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Livci's avatar

It really looks like your friend is grasping at the Ukrainians alleged massive casualties as being some kind of game changer. You could lump me in with those who believe that Ukrainian dead+maimed beyond further use troops is on the high end, like between 75-100k somewhere. But still even if my higher end estimate is real its just not enough to have any sort of decisive impact on anything.

I also wouldnt assume the danger of a Ukrainian offensive is passed, as a matter of fact if you are confident of a lower end for Ukrainian dead and permanently maimed like in the 30-50k range than they have more than enough guys to launch real strategic level offensives. Stanislav assumes higher end like me apparently but theres no debating at this point that the AFU is actually larger and better equipped now than last February. They are more dangerous, more confident and the AFUs upper level leadership honestly seems more competent than their Russian counterparts.

Im not taking anything away from Russias troops, as Ive said before given the crippling disadvantages imposed on them, the quality of their opponents (35-55 year old Ukrainian conscripts seem to be immovable objects, until they are dead you just arent getting past them) and how badly led they are from above Russias troops have been performing miracles. Mariupol was genuinely the most impressive victory of the war so far, with no significant numerical or equipment advantages the Russians beat Ukraines supposedly best troops who were defending in urban terran behind human shields. Wagner clawing Soledar away from the Ukrainians with no numerical advantages in shells or men is actually more impressive than anything NATO/the Ukrainians have pulled off so far. So im 100% pro Russia here but nonetheless I think Rosskovskey and Zhukov would rate Ukraines upper level military leadership much higher than Russias right now.

Also if stuff like this is true:

https://avia.pro/news/vsu-formiruyut-tri-armeyskih-korpusa-obshchey-chislennostyu-v-75000-voennosluzhashchih

that Ukraine is forming corps that contain divisions as opposed to just Brigades than the Ukrainians certainly arent doubting their offensive prospects. As a matter of fact it looks like the Ukrainians are learning the relevant lessons from the war whereas the Russian generals are just typically apathetic. Our 5D wizards are assuring us that none of the cool kids are interested in offensives that have sufficient mass and concentration to achieve large cauldrons and decisively influence the course of campaigns but the Ukrainians seem to be changing their force structure to do just that.

Expand full comment
Colbert's avatar

I slowly deleted all the pro-russians twitter accounts I followed since the beginning of the war.

The 3 last ones were praying the "victory" of Stalingrad.

I can understand than this is a victory for Russians and, maybe, for Poles, but watching west-europeans (or east-europeans except Poles or Russians) considering Stalingrad as a "victory", sorry, I can't.

2022 had started like a tunder of love and admiration, from me, to Russia, everything Russia did, make, etc. (I had even start considering, maybe...maybe fascists were the bad pig).

And this feel was aggravated by my awfuls readings (Martianov, his friend Larry, Xavier Moreau...even, time to time -I confess- the Saker...

Now, it's january 23, all my illusions are gone. No, Russia will not save western Europe. She just can accelerate, indirectly, the fall of our wokist regimes, by those crazy energetic (auto-)"sanctions". But I see Russia as a paralyzed giant, full of corruption, brainwashed by sovokism and liberalism.

Maybe it's too extreme....Probably, Russia is not a saint neither this absolute garbage (starting a war with 200 000 soldiers ! God !)

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts