Recently, Sergei Lavrov contacted me and asked me to draft a mission statement for Russia that should last the country through the rest of the 21st century.
'... should we take drastic measures to boost the reproductive rate of Russians or not?' It's interesting you would select this, since I think it is critical for many groups but particularly for Russia. Russia never recovered from WWII demographically. In the 90's demographic calculations indicate Russia lost ~ 5 million people, greater than any loss in history outside a major war.
The solution is ... money. It used to be the case, that having children was financially beneficial ... more hands on the farm, etc. Now, it is the opposite. So, simply give a substantial stipend to each family based on the number of children ... not a token, real money. Print some rubles and give them out (that leads to another discussion ... of the financial system ... borrowed from the West). There is nothing more critical for Russia's future. Besides the World needs more blonde, blue-eyed people in it.
Strength through joy, though. Otherwise you risk returning to the commieblock and the forced industrialization plans. Banning abortion and contraception is also a bad idea. The dregs of society reproduce faster than the better element. In the long run, no birth control is a recipe for dysgenic death spiral.
It would have been plenty more without. Do you know the black population of the US would be double present numbers if abortion had never been legalized?
If there was no BC, women would have to think twice about their sexual behavior. The old "BC means fewer blacks" argument is tired and has been rejected by smarter White Nationalists in recent years.
Yeah, but only cognitively superior women can do that. Low-impulse control, retarded women cannot even if they wanted to. That's what's dysgenic about banning birth control. It can only be done if accompanied by a state eugenic policy, and I don't think any state will do that any time soon, unfortunately.
The core principle of strength means nothing if you don't clarify (1) who is to be stronger (2) why is this subject worth to be stronger and (3) how you define strength itself. It's very clear that you are approaching this matter by an ethonationalist (ethnopatriotist?) point of view, but that's exactly where the ideology lies. When zjuganov wrote "state and power" (I don't know the russian name) it was very clear that Russia was going to have a power politics, and that it was going to be based on geopolitic. At least, it was clear to me in the West. But if that's the case, why can't you simply boost immigration rates in order to have a bigger GDP, bigger army and as result better tools in order to drive the expansion? Why would you prefer a vast amount of Russian proletariats (increasing birth rates) instead of a solid core of international bourgeoisie ready to embrace liberal values and promote the economical advancement of Russia? And so on.
If we can't even define who Russians are because they don't exist as you seem to be implying then how come the media tells me that Russians were able to hack the election and appoint Trump as the KGB puppet president in America? Also, if Russians don't exist, who is committing all those crimes against Human Rights Democracy Freedom (tm) in Ukraine?
I am trying to imply that all your reasoning on power starts from an implicit ethnonationalist assumption from which the rest derives by logical political necessity. I am an ethnonationalist, I approve this kind of reasoning, but I believe that expressed in this form it is only a weak attempt to hide the underlying ideology behind evident and derivative conclusions. The entire manifesto proposes itself as post-ideological, when in reality it has an extremely ideological background. That becomes evident for example when compared with the ideas of the Secretary of the Russian Communist Party, which identifies quite clearly in Russian Russian citizens, and not ethnic Russians.
Muscular Slavism. Teddy Roosevelt beams down from Valhalla in approval.
the world must band together to prevent the ascent of cybernetic slavs
'... should we take drastic measures to boost the reproductive rate of Russians or not?' It's interesting you would select this, since I think it is critical for many groups but particularly for Russia. Russia never recovered from WWII demographically. In the 90's demographic calculations indicate Russia lost ~ 5 million people, greater than any loss in history outside a major war.
The solution is ... money. It used to be the case, that having children was financially beneficial ... more hands on the farm, etc. Now, it is the opposite. So, simply give a substantial stipend to each family based on the number of children ... not a token, real money. Print some rubles and give them out (that leads to another discussion ... of the financial system ... borrowed from the West). There is nothing more critical for Russia's future. Besides the World needs more blonde, blue-eyed people in it.
Strength through joy, though. Otherwise you risk returning to the commieblock and the forced industrialization plans. Banning abortion and contraception is also a bad idea. The dregs of society reproduce faster than the better element. In the long run, no birth control is a recipe for dysgenic death spiral.
The last half-century of birth control use has been plenty dysgenic.
It would have been plenty more without. Do you know the black population of the US would be double present numbers if abortion had never been legalized?
If there was no BC, women would have to think twice about their sexual behavior. The old "BC means fewer blacks" argument is tired and has been rejected by smarter White Nationalists in recent years.
Yeah, but only cognitively superior women can do that. Low-impulse control, retarded women cannot even if they wanted to. That's what's dysgenic about banning birth control. It can only be done if accompanied by a state eugenic policy, and I don't think any state will do that any time soon, unfortunately.
Unlikely, I agree barring some sort of religious revival.
We need a revival of the religion of the ancient Dorians...
The core principle of strength means nothing if you don't clarify (1) who is to be stronger (2) why is this subject worth to be stronger and (3) how you define strength itself. It's very clear that you are approaching this matter by an ethonationalist (ethnopatriotist?) point of view, but that's exactly where the ideology lies. When zjuganov wrote "state and power" (I don't know the russian name) it was very clear that Russia was going to have a power politics, and that it was going to be based on geopolitic. At least, it was clear to me in the West. But if that's the case, why can't you simply boost immigration rates in order to have a bigger GDP, bigger army and as result better tools in order to drive the expansion? Why would you prefer a vast amount of Russian proletariats (increasing birth rates) instead of a solid core of international bourgeoisie ready to embrace liberal values and promote the economical advancement of Russia? And so on.
1) Russians 2) Because they're Russians 3) More Russians and Russianess. Done.
Who's Russian? Because that's the entire point.
If we can't even define who Russians are because they don't exist as you seem to be implying then how come the media tells me that Russians were able to hack the election and appoint Trump as the KGB puppet president in America? Also, if Russians don't exist, who is committing all those crimes against Human Rights Democracy Freedom (tm) in Ukraine?
I am trying to imply that all your reasoning on power starts from an implicit ethnonationalist assumption from which the rest derives by logical political necessity. I am an ethnonationalist, I approve this kind of reasoning, but I believe that expressed in this form it is only a weak attempt to hide the underlying ideology behind evident and derivative conclusions. The entire manifesto proposes itself as post-ideological, when in reality it has an extremely ideological background. That becomes evident for example when compared with the ideas of the Secretary of the Russian Communist Party, which identifies quite clearly in Russian Russian citizens, and not ethnic Russians.