Note: My big articles for Occidental Observer will be reduced to 1 post a week. Thanks to Professor MacDonald’s generous patronage, I actually make a few dollars from writing exclusively for them. Also, no one in the dissident blogosphere ever donates, ever. Looking directly at you guys. Yes, you! So with all that said, I can’t really post the big in-depth articles here until they’re published there. In the meantime, I’ll freeform blog.
-Rolo
We left off talking about the undeniably female character of Ukrainian “nationalism” and me pointing out that a lot of the unhinged behavior that we are seeing from the local population is a by-product of the intense vaginal nature of the bullying that is occurring there.
I am not the only one to notice this intensely feminine form of nationalism.
Andrew Anglin, America’s most prolific and most banned writer and political philosopher, has been quick to point out that the irate demands of the wheat wives of the great Ukrainian chornozhem to deliver weapons and military support to Zelensky’s regime are driving him insane. I too feel bile rising up into the back of my mouth whenever I tune into the American media to see just how they’re trying to rile up the American peasantry into supporting what, exactly? War with Russia over Ukraine? Fox News is a particularly egregious example of this:
And the GOP seems far more comfortable back in its familiar role as the predominant war party, don’t they? This is a role that they had to grudgingly, temporarily abandon because of Trump’s populist, America First position, and the Dems had to step up to the plate to make sure that the war and outrage machine kept chugging along, no matter the outcome of any people’s referendum,
Anyways, I’ve worked for some Western globo-homo organizations before. Still do, actually. Day job. And let me tell you this: the main concern of these people is to make sure to stuff their organizations with as many women as they possibly can, literally everwhere. The US embassy in Kazakhstan, for example, always states that one of their top priorities is the imposition of gender quotas in the public and private sectors. The hermaphrodite President of Kazakhstan, who narrowly escaped being toppled back in January during widespread unrest in the country and an attempted coup, is hell-bent on supporting and pushing through these reforms on an otherwise deeply conservative captive society.
Astana Times is quite explicit about what is being engineered in Kazakhstan:
I bring up this fake country in the central asian steppes only to highlight just how widespread and all-encompassing the effort to impose a matriarchy on the world is. I’m sure that if I chose any far-flung country really, like, say, Mongolia, the same thing would be happening.
Lets check:
Yep. You’ll have that.
But why promote females so heavily? Theories abound. I have one too.
Women are quite fond of consensus-based decision-making. In other words, women have to check in and make sure that everyone in their circle is OK with a decision before making it. This is because women are inherently not risk-takers to the same extent as men are, nor are they truth-oriented in their decision-making. A man might occasionally open his mouth and say what he thinks is the objective truth and insist that this be a priority in the decision-making process. Women are not bound by constraints such as logic and reason and facts on the ground in their decision making process. Again: consensus. Doing what everyone else says. No one domineering the others. Everyone equal. Truth a distant second priority if one at all. Feelz>realz.
And how does Oligarchy operate?
Consensus-based deliberation. Rules and regulations. Stagnation. Institutions. Liberalism. All to prevent the oligarchs’ greatest fear: the lone “strong man” rising up above the others. Should such a man arise, the other oligarchs would turn on him as one and cut him down. If they failed, he would eventually subdue the oligarchs as he transferred power from them to himself. And where to get the support necessary to take on the oligarchs? Why, by appealing to the people directly:
“I will cut through the Gordian knot of graft. No laws or regulations will stop me. Your problems will be solved. Give me the power to do what needs to be done.”
How better to prevent the rise of an Autocracy if not to promote these women to positions of power all around the world?
102 years ago, in 1920, the primary argument against ratification of the 19th Amendment - prohibiting States from denying women the right to vote - was that women's suffrage would unleash the wild, furious passions and unpredictable behavior of women in lieu of sober political judgement, inevitably supplanting facts with emotionalism and irrational logic - thank God that never happened, eh?
Oh god, that Ukrainian parliamentarian chick posing with an AK in her tight blue shirt and screaming for foreign intervention is just the epitome of everything that is wrong in this world. It's not like she's actually gonna take her AK and go defend Mariupol. No, she wants some man to go do that for her. While she's safely in Lviv. Or Washington.