Note: My big articles for Occidental Observer will be reduced to 1 post a week. Thanks to Professor MacDonald’s generous patronage, I actually make a few dollars from writing exclusively for them. Also, no one in the dissident blogosphere ever donates,
102 years ago, in 1920, the primary argument against ratification of the 19th Amendment - prohibiting States from denying women the right to vote - was that women's suffrage would unleash the wild, furious passions and unpredictable behavior of women in lieu of sober political judgement, inevitably supplanting facts with emotionalism and irrational logic - thank God that never happened, eh?
Oh god, that Ukrainian parliamentarian chick posing with an AK in her tight blue shirt and screaming for foreign intervention is just the epitome of everything that is wrong in this world. It's not like she's actually gonna take her AK and go defend Mariupol. No, she wants some man to go do that for her. While she's safely in Lviv. Or Washington.
High-t men and autists prioritize truth over consensus, because the former figure they can defend themselves if the group turns on them, and it just never occurs to the latter that feelings even exist or matter. There's also the whole strong father thing, where the patriarch instinctively understands that the tears of angry children are better to endure than whatever disaster would occur if the children's ill-considered desires were to be accommodated.
Women and low-t men (but I repeat myself) prefer consensus over truth because their hindbrains understand that they're fucked if the group ejects them.
As an aside, women became pretty influential in Roman politics during the bad, late days of empire. Curious, that.
Progressivism pushes women on the forefront of everywhere, but women cannot fathom Progress, so the process is inherently self-destructive. If it were left up to them, we'd still be stuck in the Stone Age.
Ordered by sentience, there's men, then women and children, then horses, dogs and cats and the rest of the Ark.
102 years ago, in 1920, the primary argument against ratification of the 19th Amendment - prohibiting States from denying women the right to vote - was that women's suffrage would unleash the wild, furious passions and unpredictable behavior of women in lieu of sober political judgement, inevitably supplanting facts with emotionalism and irrational logic - thank God that never happened, eh?
Oh god, that Ukrainian parliamentarian chick posing with an AK in her tight blue shirt and screaming for foreign intervention is just the epitome of everything that is wrong in this world. It's not like she's actually gonna take her AK and go defend Mariupol. No, she wants some man to go do that for her. While she's safely in Lviv. Or Washington.
High-t men and autists prioritize truth over consensus, because the former figure they can defend themselves if the group turns on them, and it just never occurs to the latter that feelings even exist or matter. There's also the whole strong father thing, where the patriarch instinctively understands that the tears of angry children are better to endure than whatever disaster would occur if the children's ill-considered desires were to be accommodated.
Women and low-t men (but I repeat myself) prefer consensus over truth because their hindbrains understand that they're fucked if the group ejects them.
As an aside, women became pretty influential in Roman politics during the bad, late days of empire. Curious, that.
Andrew Anglin can now be found under dailystormer.cn since another domain name has been taken.
Progressivism pushes women on the forefront of everywhere, but women cannot fathom Progress, so the process is inherently self-destructive. If it were left up to them, we'd still be stuck in the Stone Age.
Ordered by sentience, there's men, then women and children, then horses, dogs and cats and the rest of the Ark.
those "female" faux news talking heads are males.