Tsargrad: About 30% of Russia's Elites Want…

[Dr Livci]

I know it's gay to copy and paste a long post like this but it's relevant to the topic so no bully please. A couple months ago from a likely Prigozhin owned telegram page that has a decent sized readership:

https://katehon.com/ru/article/tri-polyusa-rossiyskih-elit

𝘍𝘪𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘩𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘐𝘛𝘚 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘙𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘢'𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩, 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴.

𝘉𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱𝘴 (𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘱 𝘧𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭), 𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘺 (𝘰𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵) 𝘪𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘺.

𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 "𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘺" 𝘰𝘳 "𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴":

1. 𝘙𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘈𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘩;

2. 𝘝𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘳 𝘗𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘯;

3. 𝘝𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘳 𝘔𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘬𝘺;

4. 𝘠𝘶𝘳𝘪 𝘉𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘷;

5. 𝘝𝘪𝘬𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘝𝘦𝘬𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘨;

6. 𝘝𝘺𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘷 𝘒𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘳;

7. 𝘈𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘝𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯;

8. 𝘔𝘪𝘬𝘩𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘍𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘮𝘢𝘯;

9. 𝘝𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘳 𝘓𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘯;

10. 𝘝𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘵 𝘈𝘭𝘦𝘬𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘷;

11. 𝘈𝘳𝘬𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘝𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘻𝘩;

12. 𝘈𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘺 𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘷.

𝘐𝘯 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘰𝘻𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳, 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘰𝘳𝘺. 𝘈𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘭, 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘩𝘶𝘨𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘢𝘥, 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘜𝘬𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦. 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘫𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘣𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘣𝘺𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 "𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘺" 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘱 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘯𝘦𝘨𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴, 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘵 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘺.

"𝘕𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭" 𝘰𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘥:

1. 𝘌𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘳𝘢 𝘕𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘢;

2. 𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘪𝘭𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘷;

3. 𝘈𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘺 𝘒𝘶𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘯;

4. 𝘔𝘢𝘬𝘴𝘶𝘵 𝘚𝘩𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘦𝘷;

5. 𝘐𝘨𝘰𝘳 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘷;

6. 𝘚𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘺 𝘕𝘢𝘳𝘺𝘴𝘩𝘬𝘪𝘯;

7. 𝘈𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘺 𝘒𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯;

8. 𝘋𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘒𝘰𝘻𝘢𝘬;

9. 𝘖𝘭𝘨𝘢 𝘓𝘺𝘶𝘣𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘢;

10. 𝘒𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯 𝘌𝘳𝘯𝘴𝘵.

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱 𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘺𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘥 𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘢 "𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦" 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦. 𝘐𝘯 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘣𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 "𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘺", 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴. 𝘚𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 "𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘥" 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘢𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱."𝘝𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘺" 𝘰𝘳 "𝘩𝘢𝘸𝘬𝘴":

1. 𝘕𝘪𝘬𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘪 𝘗𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘷;

2. 𝘝𝘺𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘷 𝘝𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘥𝘪𝘯;

3. 𝘚𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘺 𝘒𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘺𝘦𝘯𝘬𝘰;

4. 𝘋𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘙𝘰𝘨𝘰𝘻𝘪𝘯;

5. 𝘙𝘢𝘮𝘻𝘢𝘯 𝘒𝘢𝘥𝘺𝘳𝘰𝘷;

6. 𝘌𝘷𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘺 𝘗𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘰𝘻𝘩𝘪𝘯;

7. 𝘒𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘷;

8. 𝘋𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘔𝘢𝘻𝘦𝘱𝘪𝘯;

9. 𝘐𝘨𝘰𝘳 𝘈𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘴𝘩𝘬𝘪𝘯;

10. 𝘈𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘋𝘶𝘨𝘪𝘯.

𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘴. 𝘐𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴. 𝘏𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰𝘰𝘭𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 "𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴", 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴

Not sure about the last group, Kadyrov doesn't want a total defeat because without the current authorities in Moscow propping him up he is a dead man. But he is indifferent to achieving any big victory. Prigozhin was also very ambiguous in that regard and I wouldnt have included him on any victory party list. The channel being one of his projects though would put him in that category for optics sake. Also Rogozin talks a big game but when he was in charge of Roscosmos he just looted so he definitely shouldn't be on the victory list. Rol..Rurik covered Patrushnev so he also shouldnt be on the victory list..same with Kiriyenko. So the victory camp isn't working with much here.

As for the first 2 groups they should be one and the same as the post itself indicates. The second passive deafitist are only really passive so they can subtly lobby for the active defeatist. And put together they are way more organized, wealthy, and influential than the victory group. Like way more, night and day, it's not even close. But don't worry Strelkov is running shit from prison like some old school Mafia boss. 4 real. The Patriots are in control

[Rurik Skywalker]

Katehon is a GRU+Dugin+Malofeev project.

I'll read your post now.

[Rurik Skywalker]

The neutral list is total BS. 10. 𝘒𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯 𝘌𝘳𝘯𝘴𝘵. - I wrote about him during my interview with Tsiganov about him being a total Western shill. He runs channel 1 and staged protests with his journalists on air. 1. 𝘌𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘳𝘢 𝘕𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘢; LMAO REALLY?

The list of patriots is bizarre. Rogozin is powerless now. Kadyrov cares about Chechnya first, was absent during the mutiny. Prigozhin is dead. Dugin is a nobody, politically.

What a joke!

[Rurik Skywalker]

The REAL patriots are military men, militia commanders, social media personalities that are several orders of magnitude larger than Dugin.

[Dr Livci]

The list was drawn up before Prigozhins murder but I sort of agree with the neutral list in that the neutrals play the role of lobbying for the outright surrender group. That is they present a more neutral front to enable their roles as facilitators of the outright surrender faction.

Colonies like Poland, Ukraine, the Baltics are ruled directly by Zog West, ruling Russia is a bit different in that Zog needs to work through proxies like Nabiullina who take their marching orders from open unbashed pro Westerns like those on in the first group. Basically Zogs Wests rule over Russia involves more intrigue and double dealing than it does in other former Soviet Republics.

The post presenting the second group as neutrals was dumb but in the text it clarified that they are facilitators of the 1st group.

But agree with you totally about the Patriot group, that was just nonsense as I also mentioned.

[Rurik Skywalker]

It is a question i should start hammering home in my posts: "where are the patriots?" can the Zanoners name names? funny that the katehon people included prigozhin as a patriot but didn't include shoigu or Putin.

[Dr Livci]

I thought the same thing about Shoigu and Putin, hell Gerasimov? Medved? Lavrov? Lol.

As far as the misnamed neutral group goes I also would have included Soloviev. He is another example of a chameleon that can appear neutral or even patriotic so as to facilitate the activities of the open surrender faction. TBH I think Putin, Lavrov etc also belong there.

[Phoenix]

Nice mugshots and descriptions. Evidently the average Russian has no more hope of prominence in his country any more than does the average 'Westerner'. All our skins and institutions have been appropriated by the same tribe of parasites, and we're not allowed to notice this. Obviously the narratives they promote about conflicts between peoples are just cover-ups for their predation.

Is Putin even more Jewish than Hitler? Or just another mischling Judas goat deceiving and destroying patriots, and 'blackwashing' them to persuade the normies that anyone who affects to help them is really an enemy of the 'people'.

[Snackbit]

Explain how Hitler was a jewish judas goat.

[Phoenix]

It was noticed, then and since, that he and his chief associates, were far from the Aryan ideal they espoused, and had a considerable portion of jewish descent. Miles Mathis has gone into this tracing ancestry as far as the 'scrubbed' sources permit.

His political party seems to have been established as a front for military intelligence, using communist agitators, to destroy bourgeois society. He was involved in the abortive communist takeover in Bavaria, but given cover by the military. There was a lot of this sort of information which used to be more widely known before it was shoved down the memory hole. An off-beat Jew, Bjerknes, has recovered some of it and has written a multi-volume opus entitled 'Adolf Hitler : Bolshevik and Zionist'.

The sincere German nationalists and mystics were the big losers in all this, and are still blamed by the mainstream for everything that had actually been promoted by rich jews, including the liquidation of some of their lesser brethren. Tens of millions of goyim were set to kill each other - and you know who benefited. Communists destroyed the decent people in Russia and then their slaves helped destroy the decent people in Germany and Europe, set up by the Austrian painter.

The yids are cunning, but not very original. You can see that they are now running the same scam in Ukraine, where the 'neo-nazis', who will ultimately be blamed for everything were organised and paid by yiddish oligarchs, until they could put them on the public payroll. They are just the servants of the corrupt jewish oligarchs, used to dragoon the cannon fodder into being slaughtered to achieve Heavenly Jerusalem.

Miles Mathis recognised the concept of 'blackwashing', making something good look bad. You can see them doing it in America, and in Russia where the patriots are being eliminated.

[Snackbit]

Thanks for the lengthy reply. I have read some articles making a pretty convincing claim that Hitler started out as an intel agent, but I don't think that his rise to power and that of the NSDAP are all one big orchestrated act in order to again start a useless European civil war known as the second world war. The more logical explanation, usually being the correct one, is that Hitler and his government were being sincere in their beliefs and actions, and that international jewry needed the western capitalists and eastern communists to win the war and prevent the germans from breaking free from their influence.

I agree with your assesment about ukrainian "nazis" being used. How stupid are these guys, somehow calling themselves nazis but following the evidently corrupt jew Zelensky .

[Vanusha]

Mathis right or wrong at least attacks the real problem, which is the jewish bloodlines, not "the jews". Antisemitism is orchestrated and promoted as a dialectical method to divert attention, blame scapegoats and start wars by the same bloodlines. Hitler was just a pawn of big capital, I can't understand why he is still promoted as a savior in rightwing circles, it probably took a lot of brainwashing. Of course nazis and zionists collaborated in the creation of Israel. Romanovs, Rothschilds, Windsor are the same bloodline and also jewish. Also the Roosevelts and the Delanos. And yes, Putin is jewish.

[Never Forget]

So Kanye was right?

[the long warred]

🤣

[Rhone]

Did she actually say this? "You do understand that, if [actually] free elections were to be held in Russia, the fascists would win and would hang us all?"

[Rurik Skywalker]

Yes. just google it. or read my article on her.

[Rhone]

Thanks. Unbelievable.

[Nick]

Why do you bother to comment about Tsargrad? According to Medialogia’s June 2022 ranking of leading online media outlets in Russia, Tsargrad was barely in the top 20. If it were either reliable or popular, it would be worth some attention - but it doesn't seem to be either.

[Rurik Skywalker]

Tsargrad had a huge fall from grace after their journo-team was fired. They squandered the money on drugs and prostitutes apparently.

Malofeev is very similar to Prigozhin. He is also heavily involve in Africa, has a large PMC, and is involved with Donbass. Also, he is being denied more power and money because he is an outsider - even more so than Prigo was.

He will be a key player in the coming months.

oh yeah and ppl send me links and ask me for comment.