Uh-Oh! Putin Surrendered to Kiev Only Several Months Into the SMO!

Actually, it isn't shocking at all.

OK, so I know that I flipped out about having to talk about negotiations again last time and launched into an epic rant about the Logos, women and why we should legalize soup made out of dogs instead. The last part was behind the paywall and I think you should sign up to read it because I find that there are few bloggers willing to address the Dog Question in any detail other than myself or the Swiss who still eat them.

Did you know that dog can cure COVID? That is why Switzerland was spared.

I don’t know why we can’t have a rationale conversation about this topic like adults.

Again, at least read about some of my favorite dog recipes from behind the paywall and see if they don’t make your mouth water before you attack me or reject the idea. The paywall really separates the adults from the children, let me tell you. It’s like Las Vegas behind the velvet curtain. I’d share more, but that’s against the rules. Rule number one is that you do not talk about what’s in the paywall section. Rule number two is that you do not talk about what’s in the paywall section. Those are the only two rules in the paywall section. That should tell you everything you need to know.

Today thought, I’m not going to throw a tantrum and stonewall my own readers by refusing to address the new news regarding the secret peace talks in the first few months of the war. All the big Zanon posters are talking about this. But they are literally telling us the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what the news actually is. It is pure and blatant disinfo. This is what I’m talking about, generally:

The take is that Russia was ready to end the war and that this makes them the good guys, therefore they are winning this war easily.

This is wrong on two levels:

1. “Morality” is retarded and should not be used to analyze anything. The winner decides who and what is moral and Russia lost the SMO, so they are immoral by default.

2. The secret peace deal indicates just how far Russia was willing to go to stab the Novorussian and Crimean cause in the back and just how dependent Putin’s Kremlin is on the West.

Let’s recap.

The existence of this secret peace was mentioned by Lukashenko in summer, who leaked that it included Russia’s surrender of Crimea and Donbass in exchange for a return to the oligarchic status quo for Putin’s buddies in Ukraine like Medvedchuk. Putin then confirmed that such a secret peace deal was in fact signed, only he didn’t tell us what was in it.

Now, we have confirmation coming out of Ukraine, from a top-tier politician, that a peace deal was indeed concluded and then reneged on by Kiev. There was an interview on a Ukrainian channel with David Arakhamia, the leader of Zelensky’s old party that people are now discussing.

David is a Jewish man who grew up in Georgia, studied in London and has an American passport. This makes him a Ukrainian, of course, and fit to rule over the Slav peasants.

I’m Chosen (by Yahweh)

Me, I am not a Ukrainian because I don’t speak the Ukrainian language and the Rada declared recently that Russian-speaking Ukraine-dwellers like me do not exist in Ukraine. And in a way they are right. Kiev has been sending these people to die in Donbass and there are far fewer of them now. These Russian-speaking NAZIS! who were conscripted from eastern regions disproportionately and thrown into the meat grinder are being bravely attritioned by the Shoigu to save us from the Globalists. But only top secret patriots understand this. Only people who read Zanon are truly defeating the Satanists. Yes.

Anyway.

Here is the executive summary:

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, during a visit to Kyiv in the spring of 2022, convinced Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky to abandon the peace agreement with Russia and continue military action. The leader of the Servant of the People faction in the Verkhovna Rada and a participant in the Russian-Ukrainian negotiation process, David Arakhamia, spoke about this in an interview with the Ukrainian TV channel “1+1”.

According to him, the fighting could have ended last spring if Ukraine had agreed to neutrality. “Russia’s goal was to put pressure on us so that we would take neutrality. This was the main thing for them: they were ready to end the war if we accepted neutrality, like Finland once did. And we will make a commitment that we will not join NATO. This is the main thing,” Arakhamia said.

Answering the question about why Kyiv did not agree to the conditions proposed by Moscow, the deputy noted that for this it would be necessary to change the Constitution of the country. “Our path to NATO is spelled out in the Constitution. Secondly, there was and is no faith in the Russians that they will do everything. This can be done if there are security guarantees. They came in unprepared, but they could have left and then come in ready. There is no certainty that this would not have happened,” he explained.

Arakhamia said that during the discussion of the Istanbul Treaty, then British Prime Minister Boris Johnson visited the Ukrainian capital. According to the leader of the Servant of the People faction, Johnson then called on Zelensky not to sign any agreements with Russia and “just fight.”

Yes, the Chosenites decided to start this war and the brave Ukrainian peasants were used as cannon fodder. I have pity for the conscripts, truly I do. The volunteers, well, I would send them to re-education camps. Mentally-challenged adult learning centers. More on that in another article.

We still don’t know what was in the plan, but we can speculate that it was essentially a Russian surrender and that Zelensky was encouraged to pursue maximalist aims against Russia to punish the colossal mis-step committed by Putin. David seems to be confirming by omission what Lukashenko said: no regime change, no territorial change, no Donbass and no Crimea.

The opinion of one Russian patriot channel on the news:

The internal guard [siloviks] are setting up Putin, defending his “peace plan”.

I should note that the siloviks, who are now attacking independent patriots regarding criticism of the deal that was prepared in March 22, are setting up Vladimir Putin directly. After all, what happens next? The “peace plan” known to us implied only a “long-term lease of Crimea” territorially from Ukraine. That is, Crimea is not a part of the Russian Federation, as it has been since 2014, but a leased territory, like Port Arthur. LDNR, according to him, did not exist, even in the truncated version in which they existed. All new territories, including Kherson, were also subject to merger. (It’s true that they handed him over later, well, that’s a separate question.) Witnesses of that “peace plan” are Alexander Lukashenko, Gerhard Schröder and now David Arakhamia. I think that's enough.

Yes, the speculation is quite similar to something I wrote a long time ago about how Putin was perhaps being set up by his own spooks, who control his access to information.

I mean, unless Putin has a solid reason for believing that the West won’t touch him, then he ought to be taking this Not-War a little bit more seriously, no?

That is, the plan implied a weakening of the positions of the Russian Federation compared to 02/24/2022. And now they explain to us that this was some kind of opportunity to be seized. And that it would save the lives of our military. Then the question is: why was it necessary to start hostilities in order to adopt a peace plan a month later that worsened the situation in Russia? Then they would have betrayed the Northern Military District, and showed themselves as liberals, eh, gentlemen guardians? (siloviks). (…) In general, Olshansky, and Averin, and Pelevin, and many others at the front and in the rear are absolutely right in their analysis - it was Boris Johnson who saved Russia from shame herself then. Well, and the hohols are stubborn as well.

Yeah, there are two reasons for why Russia proposed such a disastrous peace plan.

Reason 1: this was just an asset grab for the Kremlin. They wanted to use the Russian military to gobble up assets in Ukraine and legitimize themselves in Ukrainian politics with this piece of paper peace deal to legitimize it and bring back Medvedchuk. Likelihood: 60%.

Reason 2: they realized that the SMO had failed because of poor planning and because they were lured into a trap by their esteemed Western colleagues who pledged not to interfere. The Kremlinites were desperate to avoid a war and were willing to sign a humiliating peace treaty to just pretend that nothing happened and return to pre-war status. Likelihood: 40%

Any other options? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section (or talk about dogs if you prefer).

Now, by providing you with these snippets and posts, I am showing you what the discussion within the absolutely huge Slavlands samizdat community actually looks like. The only fringe person here is me, really. I am so small within the Russia analyst scene that I am like a microscopic spec compared to even the smallest English-language Zanon blogger. But these people will never show you what actual Russians are discussing on their own, they will only quote official state media propaganda. Westerners looking for an alternative perspective turn to these bloggers only to get state propaganda told to them by people who pretend to be samizdat. It is a sad state of affairs. And it is always a shock of cold water to observe the difference between what is written in the West and in Russian samizdat.

Let me provide you with an example.

Let’s check in on Martyanov’s comments section. Kudos to Dr. Livsci for passing these on because I don’t go there anymore to keep my heart rate variability down and my vibes positive.

But this is a real gem worth sharing:

Extra-judicial Islamic torture squads are what the Globalists fear the most!

Back to reality — you’re going to want to strap in for this rant.

Look, Russians HATE HATE HATE former USSR Muslim migrants and dislike the current RF Muslim minorities only marginally less so. This doesn’t make the Russians a bad people, it just makes them normal and far healthier when compared to their Western counterparts. Being able to draw lines between your group and the other group is a sound and grounded and a natural instinct that should be encouraged, not condemned. Humans thrive when they are able to self-segregate, not when they are mixed together deliberately to destroy identity and to be reduced to chattel by their elite overlords.

Me, I think some Buryats and Yakutians are OK, because I’ve had relationships with their women on account of my oriental fetish and I just like asians and their culture in general. I’m weird and not a typical Russian in that way. It is a product of me growing up in the West and me seeing them as a quaint tribe of pre-moderns that are more in touch with their roots like the blue people from Avatar and not belligerent drunks who start fights with their taxi passengers like most Russians think of them. It is a SWPL middle-class Western White thing that I’ve got going on with the Siberian asians and I assure you, most Russians do not share my fascination with them.

Unless they’re ethno-hippies.

I am basically a hippy myself that doesn’t smoke weed and abhors tattoos.

I don’t understand why people are shocked to find me rubbing shoulders with the radical right just because I wear my hair long. Don’t get me wrong, these people suck, but then that’s pretty much a constant all along the spectrum. Ideology does not a better person make. But if you’re anti-modernity and feel drawn to traditional cultures and are anti-Communist/anti-Capitalism, where in the world are you going to find your home on the political spectrum? Do you not understand what the point of Wagner and Thoreau and Pushkin and the Romanticist movement was? Nationalism was a reaction against the various forms of globalism being pushed in Europe at the time. Against Christianity and synarchy in general. If it weren’t for Pushkin hating on Christianity, we wouldn’t have any Russian fairytales or myths and legends to share with our kids. He undertook this work to spite the Orthodox Church. To preserve paganism and to create a counter-culture to the trans-national elite that only spoke French and hired Italian architects or made everything look like neo-Rome with staid white columns and golden ration triangles everywhere.

Romanticism was the intellectual root and Nationalism was the political flower.

Also, at the risk of sounding like O’Reilly or Limbaugh, the Liberals in Russia are indeed hardcore racists. But they’re also philosemitic and that’s the problem, because this also comes with a lot of ideological baggage and blind ideological obedience to Jewish political and cultural ideology. Russian Liberals created Ukraine as an identity a century ago. They saw the Ukrainian peasants as a tribe of primitives more in touch with their pre-modern roots. Seriously. The creators of Ukrainian identity 1.0 were St. Petersburg aristocrats that moved to Kiev to LARP as authentic peasants and not a globalized, French-speaking elite. We’re talking turn of the 20th century here. Ukrainian peasants were like the blue-skins from Avatar to them. Some of these aristocrats, like Tolstoy, took a liking to the Cossacks instead, which is a different kind of tribal thing. But the Cossaks had become the Tsar’s enforcers in exchange for the Romanovs letting up on the whole genociding them thing, so this identity was a no-go. Also, Peter and his immediate successors were a blight on the Russian people and I don’t recognize their legitimacy.

Antichrist I name him! A curse on his soul *tfu* *tfu*!

The Bolsheviks initially promoted anti-Russian identity groups like Ukrainianism, but then backtracked in favor of Russianization because the Ukrainian identity was peasant and agrarian and they were going for an Isengard aesthetic, not a Shire vibe. This later Soviet anti-peasant backtrack is the primary source of the blood libel defamation campaign directed at modern day Russians and Donbassians by Kiev and Lvov. Curiously, the Ukrainians rarely attack Odessa because, well, Odessa is the hometown of many Chosenites and they are beyond reproach past the kitchen table setting.

Ukrainians have also become very philosemitic over the years. Nowadays, many Ukrainians cheer on the genocide of the Gazans, despite the fact that the Ukrainian identity, for centuries, was defined by opposition to the Chosenite landlords employed by the Polish oligarchy to fleece and starve them into submission. I’ve seen this insidious mind virus enter my own extended family. My grandmother used to call me a srul’ when I was a kid and didn’t want to share. Everyone thought it was hilarious. Do you what that word means? Well I’m sure you can connect the dots.

And now look at the country. They sell Israeli flags on the Maidan now. Jaw-dropping stuff. We’re like Georgians or Indians now. I drill it into people as best I can: they did the Holodomor on us. I can name names! Do you know who Bohdan Khmelnitsky was!? Do you know who he rose up in rebellion against? Do you know that they consider him Amalek? Hello!? But this is considered pro-Russian speech now because it shifts the blame.

Do you see what I am saying? Do you get it? Are you following me? Hello? HELLO!???

OK OK, let’s resurface for air for a second here.

I ask you: do the ZAnoners explain any of this history nuance and identity lore to you?

No, of course not, because it simply doesn’t fit into the pre-packaged narrative box of the Multi-Kulti-Commie-Christian utopia that they portray Russia as. And Ukrainians are either Nazis or fraternal socialist brothers when the mood strikes them. No nuance, no nothing. Just simple propaganda for the rubes to justify the latest wet verbal fart that came out of Peskov’s mouth.

Can what I just shared be fit into a simple box? No, of course not. It is anti-ideology because ideology demands that dumb people believe in a very simplified kind of nonsense and drown out all others.

But we have to deal with reality here, folks. We have to stop blindly believing like fanatics and critically thinking instead. We are not the elite. We cannot will a new reality into existence by closing our eyes and going “la-la-la!” and thinking we are morally superior for doing so.

So:

Sure, Ukrainians should just be Russians, but, sadly, they simply are not Russians anymore because elites in Washington, Moscow, Kiev and St. Petersburg conspired to create this new Avatar identity for them over time and the elites’ word is law, not the 23 & Me DNA results and phenotypical similarities that I believe should inform our decision instead. Oh well.

And you know what else sucks?

Hippies should be patriarchal, tribal, right-wing eco-extremists that want to create bases in the wilderness to plan revenge against the global government, but they are actually retarded vagina-sniffers who eat grass like cows and hate their ancestors for discovering steam power in the 18th century. Oh well.

See what I mean?

As for the secret peace deal, well, who is the guy who broke the news? David is from the same tribe as Zelensky and the oligarchs. He is rated as the #6 most influential person in Ukraine by Forbes. Knowing what you know about who actually runs the Slavlands and how/why, does this surprise you? I think it all checks out. I think it aligns EXACTLY with what I’ve been telling you for two years now about the situation.

It’s all them at the top, folks. It’s THEM. T - H - E - M. And don’t let anyone ever tell you that it is someone else.

Anyway.

I wanted to share a comment that Dr. Livsci (resident stalker doom prophet) wrote me that made me chuckle:

Imagine what Zelensky must have been thinking when this went down...like he was about to get Crimea back and presumably the DNR and LNR in exchange for signing a piece of paper that would have been thrown out in the next election cycle. Like this was an awesome deal for Ukraine actually all they had to do was renege in a few years and they would have had back everything in short order. It's not like it's hard to trick the Kremlin. So I seriously think Zelensky must have been genuinely suprised when he was told nah you aren't allowed to take the deal

(…)

This also clearly shows that the Zog West faction that wants war with Russia did does not give a fuck about Ukrainian territorial integrity, Russia was about to give back absolutely everything. They just wanted a war and that's it. I'm seriously wondering how the Kremlin was planning on selling this as a win because the win scenario looks like total defeat. Like you hate Nazis so fucking much (Nazis who are more pro Jewish than Russians by the way) that you are willing to surrender your own territory to get a peace of paper that says Ukraine is de-nazified? Then....then when an actual war with the Nazis breaks out you fucking feed them tiramisu and give them free iphones and a vacation in Turkey.

LOL.

And there it is.

Ahh, it’s just … hmm … it has a kind of grotesque beauty to it, doesn’t it?

Few people can understand just how amazing the situation in like a traveling circus freak show kind of way. It is like some disturbing modern art that only a few art buffs seem to appreciate. This farce of a war is like high-level niche political art where the artist has essentially boldly smeared his own feces on the canvas and framed it on a gallery wall. But you have to really understand the Kremlin and the incredible contortionist politics that they pursue to stay both in and out of the globalist system to appreciate it, yes.

Like, we are in a situation where Boris Johnson may have saved the Novorussian cause by not allowing the Kremlin to abandon the Donbassians to the tender mercies of the SBU and the CIA spook torture squads. BJ is the reason that Russia was forced to fight a war for Donbass independence after all. How wild is that? Hard to ideologize this revelation or to propagandize it.

But Zanon will make do or just lie, blatantly, like they ussually do.

Overall, I still don’t have a final verdict on all of what went down, but we know that it wasn’t good and that if details ever surface in their totality, it would be a bombshell. A bombshell that only Russian samizat would even pick up and cover because it would only portray the Kremlin in an ever worse light to anyone with anti-Globalist, pro-Russian positions. Meanwhile, the Zanoners will be very useful in framing this conflict historically as this epic struggle for freedom and democracy against the Autocratic hordes. This is because Zanon portrays the Kremlin as an honest, earnest, serious combatant, when the reality is that they are anything but. Russia’s loss in one shape or another is a done deal already, and now we’re in the end game where the narrative and the correct narrative to justify the conflict is necessary. Once again, Zanon is a useful foil to the powers that be, aren’t they? They will portray Russia as a serious enemy of frightening capabilities that the plucky Ukrainian rebels defeated by blowing up the death star (city of Donetsk) or something.

And now a few more words about the new peace deal in the works.

This next bit comes from the Russian side. News of planned peace talks with Kiev despite the fact that Ukraine has not been de-anything’d continue to dominate Russian samizdat. So, the Kremlin is speaking through its proxies to condemn such rumors. According to a controlled opposition party head, there is nothing to worry about. Sure, Putin sold out Novorussia to Kiev by surrendering after the SMO. But we can trust him now. Here:

The head of the SRZP party, Sergei Mironov, commented on the statements of one of the participants in the negotiations from the Ukrainian side in his telegram channel.

“The confessions of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky’s henchman and a participant in negotiations with the Russian Federation in March 2022 confirm the words of President Vladimir Putin: Russia was ready to make peace with Ukraine, but the West did not allow this,” writes Mironov.

Mironov emphasized that Verkhovna Rada Speaker David Arakhamia confirmed that Russia had three main demands: the neutral status of Ukraine, denazification and protection of the rights of the Russian-speaking population.

“Russia has never hidden these demands from anyone - they were aimed at protecting the legitimate interests of national security and the legitimate interests of Russians in Ukraine,” the parliamentarian said.

According to Mironov, the West is increasingly talking about the need to stop hostilities even at the cost of territorial concessions to Ukraine. The senator also recalled that Arakhamia spoke about some kind of referendum and suggested that in this way Kiev wants to circumvent its own ban on negotiations with Russia, and at the same time relieve itself of responsibility for their outcome.

In conclusion, Mironov recalled the basic demands of Russia.

“In this regard, I would like to recall Russia’s position, which President Putin has repeatedly stated: the issue of territories, that is, the status of Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions, is not discussed. Their status was determined as subjects of the Russian Federation by the will of the residents of these regions. Otherwise, Russia’s requirements have not changed,” Spravedross emphasized.

Earlier, Capital of the Country wrote that Arakhamia confirmed the words of Russian President Vladimir Putin about the draft peace treaty with Ukraine in March 2022.

So yeah, he’s saying that there might be talks soon, but that Putin won’t sell out like last time.

Nothing to see, everything is fine.

Just another day and another betrayal by the 5D checkers masters of Russia.