>But whatever givens I’m working with and the logic I use to string them together into a coherent worldview seem to be seem to have been pretty goddamn accurate so far, no?<
You bet.
>Furthermore, despite the fact that he’s lying (I hope that he knows that he’s lying and that he isn’t delusional) about the success of the SMO...<
"Putin says there are "no issues or problems" with how his "special military operation" is going at the moment"
Watch him smile as he talks in the video. It tells us everything.
Again, this has been Paul Craig Roberts argument from the beginning. He bangs this drum every week ... probably because he understands Washington much better than Putin does.
Too bad that Mr. Putin didn't listen to PCR from the start. It took the Russian president over 8 years to come to the same conclusions about the diabolical intentions of Washington that Mr. Roberts reached immediately after the Deep State-directed Maidan Coup.
Why is it that Russia has never taken decisive actions to destroy Ukraine's rail network especially as more and more NATO and US weapons have arrived? I can understand initially they may have wanted to preserve the infrastructure but after western leaders and actors began to routinely arrive it just made Russia look very weak. How many Russian soldiers have needlessly lost their lives because these weapon shipments were not halted near the border?
good report; but you say "My working theory is that it was one of those rare lucid moments when the old Joe Biden personality from the 90s briefly surfaced and spoke some common sense." I believe the 'old' joe bidet is dead, and has been for a few years; there are three actors for his avatar, and they're doing a splendid job of behaving like stupid shits.
Now, the "why" the AngloZionist Empire is going after Russia is a whole other thing that they don't even scratch much at, outside of muh 'Merican hegemony, military industrial parasite, etc.
IMO the reasons are a lot freakier and darker. But we're probably going to find out as things grind on.
Everything that you write is based on one single assumption: that Putin and his government are not part of the same global cabal that controls all Western governments.
Bearing in mind that the invasion of Ukraine was absolutely essential for Western governments to use as the excuse for sending energy prices through the roof - a key globalist objective; and bearing in mind that Putin & Co. did and said exactly the same things at each stage of the 'Covid crisis' and clot shots operation as all other (globalist) governments...
- I think that your assumption that Putin & Co. are not working for the global cabal is wrong.
I think that the supposed antagonism between Russia and the West is just a lonf-planned piece of theatre for the masses - where Putin has to play the bad guy... so that the populations of the West won't realize that their own governments are deliberately destroying their own economies for the Great Reset.
How does one prove anything? If you look at Putin’s background he owes his entire career to the west. Klaus Schwab has called Putin a WEF young leader on multiple occasions. The head of the Russian central bank, a globohomo shill, was reappointed after sending 400 billion dollars abroad to get seized by the west. Russia was fully onboard with the WEF agenda on covid, forced mandatory vaccines, and upcoming CBDCs. Putin’s actions in Ukraine are consistent with the war being fake and controlled. I mean, what smoking gun are you looking for here? This theory neatly explains everything you are seeing on the ground and has solid predictive power for future developments, versus whatever your current theory is leaving you consistently befuddled and confused at every step.
>Klaus Schwab has called Putin a WEF young leader on multiple occasions.
Except he wasnt and Schwab admitted he misspoke.
> This theory neatly explains everything you are seeing on the ground and has solid predictive power for future developments
Oh, really? Then make some and let's see. I'm the only one making any predictions worth a damn and I'm sure as hell not using that 5D kabuki theater theory.
> versus whatever your current theory is leaving you consistently befuddled and confused at every step.
If I'm able to consistently make good calls, who is the befuddled one really?
How the hell does "Putin owe his career to the west" when they were just trying to replace him with Navalny? I could just as easily say "Assad owes his career to the west, he was a dentist in the UK and his dad and grand dad had some vauge connections to the French. The whole Syrian war is a conspiracy to ship africans to Europe and drive up oil prices which are part of the great reset". Or "the Taliban owe their power to the West, the CIA totally confirms having trained them up in Pakistan on multiple occasions. When you look at how the US left Afghanistan its obvious that the Taliban were ordered to pretend to fight so the US would have an excuse to leave since the CIA knew that the military would need to send all their weapons and advisors to Ukraine as opposed to Afghanistan. Its all part of the great reset agenda, if the Taliban werent working for Schwab they would have drove out NATO earlier as opposed to right before all the Ukraine stuff started"
Anyone can throw out any theories about anything; what matters is whether they flesh out an actual argument based in fact and whether the theory has *predictive value* about the future. Yes, I would argue the US withdrew from Afghanistan because globohomo knew a war with Ukraine was upcoming and wanted their forces available for it. They kept the forever war in Afghanistan going for 20 years to enable unlimited graft and fleecing of the American public; they could have crushed the Taliban quickly if they were serious about it. Something like 5 trillion dollars of Pentagon funds are unaccounted for and they have failed every audit conducted for 20+ years.
The Syria war was about Iran, which does not have a Rothschild owned central bank, is not a part of globohomo and hence is constantly demonized. Globohomo wanted to dismantle it on behalf of Israel.
The Navalny thing went nowhere and Putin remains firmly in control. Matt Tabibi had a long, detailed article about Putin’s rise due to globohomo awhile ago if you want to dredge it up.
Well you are saying the Ukraine war is all fake anyway and Putin is actually working for Schwab or the Rothschilds or whoever. So actually there would be no need for the US to pull out of Afghanistan if thats all true about Putin. Also you say that the US could have crushed the Taliban if they wanted but didn't because of a conspiracy to do mass graft. I actually agree with you about the graft but that would not have been mutually exclusive with destroying the Taliban.
The truth is the US could have crushed the Taliban but not with in the context that the war was framed in. The war was framed as bringing femminism, gay sex and mass opiate production to Afghanistan without hurting too many people and without offending the moderate Islamic values dearly held by most Afghans.
The State Department really believed this was possible, the spooks told them it was possible while not having any clue what was actually happening outside Kabul besides what the bakha bazi drug Lords were telling them which were all lies, and that led to years of nothing much happening. Biden eventually announces the troops will withdraw, the Taliban show up outside the US embassy and the US is humiliated in front of the world. Was the humiliating exit also "theater"?
The point is no 5D chess is needed to actually explain what happened there, negligent spooks, woke retarded diplomats and banal corruption explain it all with no need for theatre to fool people on obscure internet forums. However absolutely anything can be made to look like its part of some 5d chess master plan.
In short you are just flipping the Sakers BS about Putin playing 5D chess and saying "nah actually schwab is playing 5D chess".
There are multiple reasons for the U.S. military to be heavily involved in Ukraine necessitating a withdrawal from Afghanistan, which I can go into if it interests you.
Your Afghan theory is non-explanatory with respect to why we were there for 20 years, doing nothing other than achieving endless graft. The truth is the war itself was simply a cover for the graft, and there was never any intention of winning. The hearts and minds strategy was just another feint to continue the graft indefinitely.
As mentioned above, a theory needs to be judged by its prediction ability. The Saker's theories about All Powerful Russia have all been proven wrong over the past year and he's turned himself into a laughingstock by doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on it. Alternatively Strelkov's pessimistic views have been proven correct.
The direction that events consistently move in, based on a high degree of accuracy, points to a cabal in control of the world, the core of which is the mostly Jewish owners of the world central banks and their intention to soak up even more money and power for themselves. When you understand that and how the systems they have devised are structured, the world makes so much more sense.
You must have a very rigorous standard of disproof. All it would take for me to throw this out is Putin denouncing the WEF and WHO, stopping all the Sputnik 5 and cattle-tag "4IR" nonsense, and perhaps hanging some of the most egregious oligarchs for treason... or at least freezing some assets. The West could still call him a bad guy.
Its all looking more and more like the same old ethnic neocon problem to me. If Russia goes down in total defeat the jews within the Oligarchy will come out ahead. They will either be the direct rulers or the string pullers of the successor puppet states that will exist on the territory of the former RF. The non jews amongst the present elite will be hung or spend life in prison. Miller and Gref will be painted as "Putins Oligarchs who financed his bloody war against Democracy in Ukraine" and the peasants in the West will be none the wiser in regards to what pro Western cucks they actually were. The non jews in the Oligarchy desperately want to go back to the status quo and get the convergence Rolo is talking about back on track.
The jewish Oligarchs want a straight defeat for Russia because they increasingly have less and less stake in the current system and the initial purge in February and March hit them the hardest. They will be portrayed as victims unlike Greff, Miller, Nabiullina etc. A total partitioning and divvying up of the remains of the RF along the ethnic neocons lines would suit them just fine. However the Greffs and Millers want to hang on to the current rotten system and set the clock back, they seriously dont understand that things have already gone to far and nothing but a clear cut victory will save their lives and some of their fortune and power.
It seems like a small number of the non Jewish elite are catching on to this, Kadyrov, Medved, and that Malofeev dude who owns tsargrad tv for example. Unfortunately the non jews who are working in tandem with the jews are the more influencial and more absolutely delusional of the bunch. But the glue holding the 5th column together are certainly the yids, no doubt.
I haven't seen any hard proof his wife is other than physiognomy but lots of people from the Caucasus have that Neanderthal skull and nose. But after a quick yandex search it appears his daughter is definitely married to one so yeah whatever. Put them in the demands a permanent solution category. You can learn something new and disappointing every day.
This whole thing since 2014 has been bad for the Ukraine, which shows it is a puppet state used to provoke. Ever since USA-Nuland handpicked the puppets the Ukraine lost Crimea, then 1/2 the Donbas, then Azov coast, and now lost electricity.
It seems reasonable to assume that Russia will eventually have to react to provocations as the provocations will otherwise keep escalating. So what can Russia reasonably do? Tactical nukes in Ukraine are an option. Anything else? Strikes against Nato facilities training or repairing Ukrainian arms would be a much larger step than nukes in Ukraine.
Earlier this year, Russia was facing a blockade of its enclave. Somehow the EU lifted this blockade. So maybe this is why Putin hopes that sometimes the West does back down.
Russia's main problem is it is on its own, for the most part. Cuba is not going to cut off the Mississippi/Gulf with anti-ship missiles and China is not going to supply free weapons. Unless these countries think "If Russia goes down, then we are next" Russia will be cornered into using nukes because of the vast array of countries against it.
"Vast array" is a bit of an exaggeration. 20 years ago, 70% of the world supported the USA. Now, that has been whittled down to 45%. The world is tired of NATO aggression and soon there will be a massive response to it.
"Theologically, the only difference between the Orthodox position and the Evangelical one regarding the end times is that Orthodox priest are quick to point out that nothing we do can quicken or affect the slotted date for when the end of the world will kick off. In contrast, Evangelicals believe that they can expedite the end times by supporting Israel, triggering a nuclear war, followed by the Rapture, the return of Jesus, the dead rising from their graves like zombies and so on."
I feel you really need to watch those last eps of Sophia again.
It's not that there is nothing we can do. It's that the Evangelicals want to bring the reign of hell on earth. There is a difference.
>I feel you really need to watch those last eps of Sophia again.
Huh?
>It's that the Evangelicals want to bring the reign of hell on earth.
Yeah, so that the reign of heaven can come afterwards. Anyone can read the prophecies m8.
>There is a difference.
Orthodox also believe that the bad times come before the good times. They're working with teh same source material. The only difference is that they dont try to expedite the coming of the bad times.
I feel like "the reign of hell on earth" doesn't bother you much and maybe those are first world problems, but like, the pandora's box these people are opening should seriously worry you.
No rapture btw.
"Sophia" is a Russian miniseries about Ivan III and Sophia Paleologos. Really good.
You may not believe this, but we've been here before, unless we choose to not be.
Russia wont do shit. Pussies. NATO doesn t give a flying fuck, they will give the ukranians everything tanks, F16, ATACMS, and even nukes because....fuck you that s why. The ukranians will continue to sucker punch the russians( Crimeea Bridge 2.0). And the Kremlin wont do shit, pussies. Putin ain t Stalin.
>But whatever givens I’m working with and the logic I use to string them together into a coherent worldview seem to be seem to have been pretty goddamn accurate so far, no?<
You bet.
>Furthermore, despite the fact that he’s lying (I hope that he knows that he’s lying and that he isn’t delusional) about the success of the SMO...<
"Putin says there are "no issues or problems" with how his "special military operation" is going at the moment"
Watch him smile as he talks in the video. It tells us everything.
Again, this has been Paul Craig Roberts argument from the beginning. He bangs this drum every week ... probably because he understands Washington much better than Putin does.
Too bad that Mr. Putin didn't listen to PCR from the start. It took the Russian president over 8 years to come to the same conclusions about the diabolical intentions of Washington that Mr. Roberts reached immediately after the Deep State-directed Maidan Coup.
Washington doesn t fuck around.
Why is it that Russia has never taken decisive actions to destroy Ukraine's rail network especially as more and more NATO and US weapons have arrived? I can understand initially they may have wanted to preserve the infrastructure but after western leaders and actors began to routinely arrive it just made Russia look very weak. How many Russian soldiers have needlessly lost their lives because these weapon shipments were not halted near the border?
Wondering the same for whole time.
good report; but you say "My working theory is that it was one of those rare lucid moments when the old Joe Biden personality from the 90s briefly surfaced and spoke some common sense." I believe the 'old' joe bidet is dead, and has been for a few years; there are three actors for his avatar, and they're doing a splendid job of behaving like stupid shits.
yeah why not. ill believe it.
Even if they aren't using a double, Biden doesn't even decide if he wipes his own ass.
So, what's going on, for reals? Who knows. But I'm way more confident in Larry Johnson and Andrei Martyanov's analysis than anybody else's:
https://sonar21.com/
https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/
Read up on them and see if you agree.
Now, the "why" the AngloZionist Empire is going after Russia is a whole other thing that they don't even scratch much at, outside of muh 'Merican hegemony, military industrial parasite, etc.
IMO the reasons are a lot freakier and darker. But we're probably going to find out as things grind on.
I dont agree at all.
Everything that you write is based on one single assumption: that Putin and his government are not part of the same global cabal that controls all Western governments.
Bearing in mind that the invasion of Ukraine was absolutely essential for Western governments to use as the excuse for sending energy prices through the roof - a key globalist objective; and bearing in mind that Putin & Co. did and said exactly the same things at each stage of the 'Covid crisis' and clot shots operation as all other (globalist) governments...
- I think that your assumption that Putin & Co. are not working for the global cabal is wrong.
I think that the supposed antagonism between Russia and the West is just a lonf-planned piece of theatre for the masses - where Putin has to play the bad guy... so that the populations of the West won't realize that their own governments are deliberately destroying their own economies for the Great Reset.
They were doing just fine destroying their economies without the war.
Your thesis is unfalsifiable. It might be true, but there's no way to prove it wrong. That's the problem with 5D theories.
How does one prove anything? If you look at Putin’s background he owes his entire career to the west. Klaus Schwab has called Putin a WEF young leader on multiple occasions. The head of the Russian central bank, a globohomo shill, was reappointed after sending 400 billion dollars abroad to get seized by the west. Russia was fully onboard with the WEF agenda on covid, forced mandatory vaccines, and upcoming CBDCs. Putin’s actions in Ukraine are consistent with the war being fake and controlled. I mean, what smoking gun are you looking for here? This theory neatly explains everything you are seeing on the ground and has solid predictive power for future developments, versus whatever your current theory is leaving you consistently befuddled and confused at every step.
>Klaus Schwab has called Putin a WEF young leader on multiple occasions.
Except he wasnt and Schwab admitted he misspoke.
> This theory neatly explains everything you are seeing on the ground and has solid predictive power for future developments
Oh, really? Then make some and let's see. I'm the only one making any predictions worth a damn and I'm sure as hell not using that 5D kabuki theater theory.
> versus whatever your current theory is leaving you consistently befuddled and confused at every step.
If I'm able to consistently make good calls, who is the befuddled one really?
How the hell does "Putin owe his career to the west" when they were just trying to replace him with Navalny? I could just as easily say "Assad owes his career to the west, he was a dentist in the UK and his dad and grand dad had some vauge connections to the French. The whole Syrian war is a conspiracy to ship africans to Europe and drive up oil prices which are part of the great reset". Or "the Taliban owe their power to the West, the CIA totally confirms having trained them up in Pakistan on multiple occasions. When you look at how the US left Afghanistan its obvious that the Taliban were ordered to pretend to fight so the US would have an excuse to leave since the CIA knew that the military would need to send all their weapons and advisors to Ukraine as opposed to Afghanistan. Its all part of the great reset agenda, if the Taliban werent working for Schwab they would have drove out NATO earlier as opposed to right before all the Ukraine stuff started"
Anyone can throw out any theories about anything; what matters is whether they flesh out an actual argument based in fact and whether the theory has *predictive value* about the future. Yes, I would argue the US withdrew from Afghanistan because globohomo knew a war with Ukraine was upcoming and wanted their forces available for it. They kept the forever war in Afghanistan going for 20 years to enable unlimited graft and fleecing of the American public; they could have crushed the Taliban quickly if they were serious about it. Something like 5 trillion dollars of Pentagon funds are unaccounted for and they have failed every audit conducted for 20+ years.
The Syria war was about Iran, which does not have a Rothschild owned central bank, is not a part of globohomo and hence is constantly demonized. Globohomo wanted to dismantle it on behalf of Israel.
The Navalny thing went nowhere and Putin remains firmly in control. Matt Tabibi had a long, detailed article about Putin’s rise due to globohomo awhile ago if you want to dredge it up.
Well you are saying the Ukraine war is all fake anyway and Putin is actually working for Schwab or the Rothschilds or whoever. So actually there would be no need for the US to pull out of Afghanistan if thats all true about Putin. Also you say that the US could have crushed the Taliban if they wanted but didn't because of a conspiracy to do mass graft. I actually agree with you about the graft but that would not have been mutually exclusive with destroying the Taliban.
The truth is the US could have crushed the Taliban but not with in the context that the war was framed in. The war was framed as bringing femminism, gay sex and mass opiate production to Afghanistan without hurting too many people and without offending the moderate Islamic values dearly held by most Afghans.
The State Department really believed this was possible, the spooks told them it was possible while not having any clue what was actually happening outside Kabul besides what the bakha bazi drug Lords were telling them which were all lies, and that led to years of nothing much happening. Biden eventually announces the troops will withdraw, the Taliban show up outside the US embassy and the US is humiliated in front of the world. Was the humiliating exit also "theater"?
The point is no 5D chess is needed to actually explain what happened there, negligent spooks, woke retarded diplomats and banal corruption explain it all with no need for theatre to fool people on obscure internet forums. However absolutely anything can be made to look like its part of some 5d chess master plan.
In short you are just flipping the Sakers BS about Putin playing 5D chess and saying "nah actually schwab is playing 5D chess".
There are multiple reasons for the U.S. military to be heavily involved in Ukraine necessitating a withdrawal from Afghanistan, which I can go into if it interests you.
Your Afghan theory is non-explanatory with respect to why we were there for 20 years, doing nothing other than achieving endless graft. The truth is the war itself was simply a cover for the graft, and there was never any intention of winning. The hearts and minds strategy was just another feint to continue the graft indefinitely.
As mentioned above, a theory needs to be judged by its prediction ability. The Saker's theories about All Powerful Russia have all been proven wrong over the past year and he's turned himself into a laughingstock by doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on it. Alternatively Strelkov's pessimistic views have been proven correct.
The direction that events consistently move in, based on a high degree of accuracy, points to a cabal in control of the world, the core of which is the mostly Jewish owners of the world central banks and their intention to soak up even more money and power for themselves. When you understand that and how the systems they have devised are structured, the world makes so much more sense.
You must have a very rigorous standard of disproof. All it would take for me to throw this out is Putin denouncing the WEF and WHO, stopping all the Sputnik 5 and cattle-tag "4IR" nonsense, and perhaps hanging some of the most egregious oligarchs for treason... or at least freezing some assets. The West could still call him a bad guy.
I suppose you'll tell me he's just weak.
Bezuhov you have consistently the best takes on this stuff. Nicely done.
This seems to be it 😔
Its all looking more and more like the same old ethnic neocon problem to me. If Russia goes down in total defeat the jews within the Oligarchy will come out ahead. They will either be the direct rulers or the string pullers of the successor puppet states that will exist on the territory of the former RF. The non jews amongst the present elite will be hung or spend life in prison. Miller and Gref will be painted as "Putins Oligarchs who financed his bloody war against Democracy in Ukraine" and the peasants in the West will be none the wiser in regards to what pro Western cucks they actually were. The non jews in the Oligarchy desperately want to go back to the status quo and get the convergence Rolo is talking about back on track.
The jewish Oligarchs want a straight defeat for Russia because they increasingly have less and less stake in the current system and the initial purge in February and March hit them the hardest. They will be portrayed as victims unlike Greff, Miller, Nabiullina etc. A total partitioning and divvying up of the remains of the RF along the ethnic neocons lines would suit them just fine. However the Greffs and Millers want to hang on to the current rotten system and set the clock back, they seriously dont understand that things have already gone to far and nothing but a clear cut victory will save their lives and some of their fortune and power.
It seems like a small number of the non Jewish elite are catching on to this, Kadyrov, Medved, and that Malofeev dude who owns tsargrad tv for example. Unfortunately the non jews who are working in tandem with the jews are the more influencial and more absolutely delusional of the bunch. But the glue holding the 5th column together are certainly the yids, no doubt.
Malofeev is married to an ethnic neocon and his daughter spreads tranny propaganda in Russia.
I haven't seen any hard proof his wife is other than physiognomy but lots of people from the Caucasus have that Neanderthal skull and nose. But after a quick yandex search it appears his daughter is definitely married to one so yeah whatever. Put them in the demands a permanent solution category. You can learn something new and disappointing every day.
A good rule of thumb for eastern europe is that the harder someone thumps their bibles, the more compromised and corrupt they really are.
You correctly describe some Evangelical sentiments, but Evangelicals are nowhere near the decision making in this matter.
No, it's the people that they worship who run America.
Bingo. You've nailed it, my friend. "So foul a sky clears not without a storm." -- Shakespeare, King John; Act 4, Scene 2
This whole thing since 2014 has been bad for the Ukraine, which shows it is a puppet state used to provoke. Ever since USA-Nuland handpicked the puppets the Ukraine lost Crimea, then 1/2 the Donbas, then Azov coast, and now lost electricity.
Seems ukies struck a Melitopol holiday resort with yank HIMARS, killing and injuring civilians.
Is VVP going to give another speech of satisfaction on the SMO ?
It was a "military hotel" according to Kiev.
It seems reasonable to assume that Russia will eventually have to react to provocations as the provocations will otherwise keep escalating. So what can Russia reasonably do? Tactical nukes in Ukraine are an option. Anything else? Strikes against Nato facilities training or repairing Ukrainian arms would be a much larger step than nukes in Ukraine.
Earlier this year, Russia was facing a blockade of its enclave. Somehow the EU lifted this blockade. So maybe this is why Putin hopes that sometimes the West does back down.
Russia's main problem is it is on its own, for the most part. Cuba is not going to cut off the Mississippi/Gulf with anti-ship missiles and China is not going to supply free weapons. Unless these countries think "If Russia goes down, then we are next" Russia will be cornered into using nukes because of the vast array of countries against it.
"Vast array" is a bit of an exaggeration. 20 years ago, 70% of the world supported the USA. Now, that has been whittled down to 45%. The world is tired of NATO aggression and soon there will be a massive response to it.
NATO plus Australia/Japan is a vast array. How much money and military support is the 55% sending to Russia?
Time will tell.
ehhhhhh
"Theologically, the only difference between the Orthodox position and the Evangelical one regarding the end times is that Orthodox priest are quick to point out that nothing we do can quicken or affect the slotted date for when the end of the world will kick off. In contrast, Evangelicals believe that they can expedite the end times by supporting Israel, triggering a nuclear war, followed by the Rapture, the return of Jesus, the dead rising from their graves like zombies and so on."
I feel you really need to watch those last eps of Sophia again.
It's not that there is nothing we can do. It's that the Evangelicals want to bring the reign of hell on earth. There is a difference.
>I feel you really need to watch those last eps of Sophia again.
Huh?
>It's that the Evangelicals want to bring the reign of hell on earth.
Yeah, so that the reign of heaven can come afterwards. Anyone can read the prophecies m8.
>There is a difference.
Orthodox also believe that the bad times come before the good times. They're working with teh same source material. The only difference is that they dont try to expedite the coming of the bad times.
I feel like "the reign of hell on earth" doesn't bother you much and maybe those are first world problems, but like, the pandora's box these people are opening should seriously worry you.
No rapture btw.
"Sophia" is a Russian miniseries about Ivan III and Sophia Paleologos. Really good.
You may not believe this, but we've been here before, unless we choose to not be.
>I feel like "the reign of hell on earth" doesn't bother you much
Look around you man.
>No rapture btw.
Rapture was made up by a channeler in the 19th century.
>"Sophia" is a Russian miniseries about Ivan III and Sophia Paleologos. Really good.
If its about the turn of the century neo-gnostic heretics, I'll give it a watch.
Funny, it does mention it but you might be slightly disappointed on that front. Come for the visuals, stay for the story!
P.S. If you think *this* is hell on earth, just wait! The oligarchs have even nastier plans! But you already know this! Now crank up that Netflix
And if you're wondering if I mean "can we stop Armageddon" watch my new YouTube video premiering tomorrow!
The americans bombed NS1 and NS2. That s a clear declaration of war. And the russians did what?
Russia wont do shit. Pussies. NATO doesn t give a flying fuck, they will give the ukranians everything tanks, F16, ATACMS, and even nukes because....fuck you that s why. The ukranians will continue to sucker punch the russians( Crimeea Bridge 2.0). And the Kremlin wont do shit, pussies. Putin ain t Stalin.
An orphan comment follows (aka IDP = internally displaced post)
~~
Wowaweewah and shucks howdy indeed! You sure sport a knack for brilliant reporting 😁
`Nother due credit is squirming to be dispensed for filling a yawning gap in our education: racist comes from Russia—who'd a thunk it?! 😂
PS Pun not intended... until very much intended 🤭