31 Comments

The Tucker/Putin interview so perfectly encapsulates this (pseudo) populist / oligarchical dichotomy. The Z-anons and those in traditional frameworks literally cannot comprehend what they watched, it short circuits their brains. This is why Putin was unhappy with the interview and pretended to be "fooled" (as he always does) -- it highlights his true loyalties too much. I think it will be discussed for a long time to come.

Expand full comment

(((consuela)))

Expand full comment

Not sure if you need this Rolo but, I just want to say thank you very much, I got caught up many years ago when the war (not-war) kicked off, and being a paying sub I can say I'm getting my money's worth, down the penny.

So again, thank you for what you do Rolo.

As an aside I linked two gents your substack page and am wondering if they have reached out to you for an appearance on their Tuesday livestreams for a discussion on the slavlands as regards propaganda from the West and East?

Expand full comment

thank you for spreading my work. that helps a lot. it was a Stalker who got me on the recent Geopolitics podcast.

i havent heard from anyone. did you give them my email?

Expand full comment

No not your email, just your substack link, if you pass your email I shall resend them that link to get in touch with you.

Expand full comment

rolo lives @ proton mail . com

Expand full comment

*... down to the penny. (Slight misspelling there).

Expand full comment

Rolo is perhaps the most astute social-political writer around.

Expand full comment

Rolo, have you ever done a deep dive on Tesak? If not, could you do so please?

Expand full comment

"The problem exists on an emotional level. It comes from the sinking realization that no one is coming galloping in on a white horse to save us from the brave new world to come."

Yes indeed.

"Russia is not allies with either China or Iran, and barely trades with either of them. But that is a topic for another time."

There you go teasing me about China again.....

One correction - Saker was not pro-Israel. His part of the triad of deception was to rope in those of us anti-Zionists looking for the white horse rider. His unipolar "Anglo-Zionist" empire vs the BRICS multipolar world order narrative was very effective on me for a while. Glad I finally woke up.

Expand full comment

Yes, i edited that part out. i usually hit publish and edit it after. the ppl who read the emails dont see the updated version.

Expand full comment

You are spreading disinformation by claiming that the Russian state does not have foreign intelligence operations in the United States.

The US head of FBI counter intelligence, investigating Russia, was on Herman Gref's payroll for over 20 years.

Moshe Kantor is one of the primary foreign operatives of the Russia security services overseas. Kantor wrote the EU immigration policy to destabilize western Europe. Kantor wrote the hate speech law framework in the EU to make it illegal to criticize the implementation of a Dugist immigration policy for western Europe.

Putin's security state controls Chabad and controls the Israeli Likud party. They are used constantly to implement Russia's overseas foreign policy.

Trump's campaign manager Manafort was arrested for moving over $150 million dollars from Russian oligarchs. Ericson was arrested by the FBI and had hand written notes on how to pass a GRU Russian Military intelligence recruitment interview. Ericson was member of Trump campaign who handled the classified documents handed over from the Obama to the Trump administration.

To claim that Russia has no overseas intelligence operations is just simply disinformation.

Russian total spending on foreign intelligence, infiltration and influence operations is over $80 billion US dollars per year.

Expand full comment

Completely wrong.

Kantor is a Russian Jewish businessman, i.e. thief of public assets connected to organised crime. He was the head of the European Jewish Congress, an American organisation that aims at influencing the Jews in Europe, not directly the European ruling class. The country-level Jewish groups are orders of magnitude more influential. Not much substance behind the grand name.

Kantor has played no role in the immigration policies in Europe. The sabotage of Frontex and the paralysis of the immigration enforcement come from the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, where the hand of Soros is at work, not Kantors.

Chabad and the Hassidic Jews have their own objectives are quite independent both from the Mossad, the CIA and of course the FSB.

You put a display of ignorance.

Expand full comment

Are you an Israeli Hasbara expert.

>Kantor has played no role in the immigration policies in Europe.

Dig!

If you dont think hundreds of millions of a year dumped into a network of thousands of NGOs for +30 years influences government policy. Then you might be working for the FSB as a disinformation agent.

>Kantor has played no role in the immigration policies in Europe.

Are you seriously claiming this? Prove that the NGOs he is funding are not engaged in the activities they are involved in.

>Chabad and the Hassidic Jews have their own objectives are quite independent both from the Mossad, the CIA and of course the FSB.

After the Rebbe died and the USSR collapsed, what were the names of the two Russian Jewish oligarchs who started dumping billions of dollars building up Chabad?

What is their relationship to Putin and the FSB?

Why did Putin give chase the non-Chabad Rabbi out of Russia and put Chabad in charge of all post-Soviet sphere Jewish communities?

Expand full comment

The immigration policies in Europe stem from a confluence of a few deleterious factors :

1. Socialist/leftist/progressive decolonial pro third world ideology.

2. Replacement of workers because the age pyramid of natives is not wide enough at the base; many high level executives consider that Europeans, Arabs, Blacks, Asians, Indians are fungible workers with proper training so they want to bring immigrants to keep the worker/retiree ratio 4 to 1. Openly stated policy.

3. The ruling class views remittances sent to the third world as a way of funding the development of those countries; they have failed to develop them with public funds because these are embezzled and they think that they succeed through remittances.

4. Plain old laziness by civil servants. Why expel those illegals when activists in (1) explain that it is immoral to do so ? Just collect the pay, do nothing and claim the high moral ground !

5. The European commission considers the weakening of the European nation states through unassimilable immigration as positive because it paves the way for a political union with them at the helm.

Jews play a leading role in (1) but have negligible role in the rest. The views in 2-5 reflect corrupted minds of the ruling classes but neither Jews nor Russian oligarchs have anything to do with them. It is sui generis degeneracy.

Expand full comment

NATO disagrees with you

This is a history of Russian intelligence and foreign influence operations and their usage of mass migration for political destabilization.

https://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_4467_20801335PBW_21_042_15702

Expand full comment

There is a whole NATO security apparatus, full of military intelligence personal tracking these POIs (Persons of Interest) and the flow of these funds. Its a constant issue of discussion in eastern European security and NATO circles.

"Who is funding these groups? Why are they funding them?". "Who wrote these laws."

The "Hate Speech" laws in Florida, that were signed by DeSantis were written by Mosche Kantor and Mosche Kantor is part of the Russian FSB state apparatus and is a proxy for Russian security interests. Mosche Kantor is the left hand of Putin.

Read: DOI: 10.4467/20801335PBW.21.042.15702

> The genesis, theory, and practice of Russian coercive migration engineering.

A contribution to the study of the migration crisis on NATO’s eastern flank, MICHAŁ WOJNOWSKI

In the International Security Review.

1. Which NGOs are pushing open borders

2. Who is funding them

3. Why are they funding them.

The answer

- Mosche Kantor and proxies for the Russian state funds the NGOS

- Why? To implement Dugin's plan for Europe

And neither is Soros a private individual. Soros is part of a "Security Interest" group. Soros does not and did not independently formulate his policy agendas. When you are managing 15,000 NGO groups, you are not managing any individual NGO group or can even remember their names.

All of these NGOs are funded and supported by nation states. They are funded through heavy EU grants and "private" grants and foundation funds. They are actually part of a state security apparatus.

Expand full comment

Your paper proved more interesting than anticipated. It explains that Russia understood the destabilising effects of multiculturalism and mass immigration and has developed a military doctrine to use them. It made two good uses of immigration pressure : Finland 2016 and Poland 2020.

But the USA did the same and on a grand scale. The USA destabilised Irak and Syria then in 2015 drove 1 MM people into Europe with the cooperation of the European Commission. Russia is really a small player compared to the USA.

So I must add a 6th point to my list: The big powers, USA, Russia, and China have the ability to engineer mass migrations into Europe and destroy the cohesion of nation states.

Soros has real financial acumen and has made "legit" money speculating. That said he has received a big helping hand several times in his life and his NGO financing follows the agenda of his masters. It is unclear who they are. As for Kantor, he has been involved with the American/European/World Jewish Congress, which is a Jewish American institution. So he is a Jewish American agent or a double Jewish American Russian agent. His influence in Europe is negligible compared to the country-based Jewish organisation such as the Consistoire and CRIF in France.

Expand full comment

Mosche spent billions over 30 years, funding thousands of NGOs.

Mosche is spending more money than Soros.

Expand full comment

Joel Skousen’s theory makes more sense to me now, regarding the phony fall of the Soviet Union.

Expand full comment

the ussr did fall though. it was liberalism and trotskyism that triumphed. there are no stalinists in power anymore.

Expand full comment

The best explanation that I found is that Gorbatchiov was tasked with reforming the economy and saving the USSR but he tried to reform the ideology and keep the international clout. When he failed, he was removed in order to proceed with the reform of the economy at the expense of the USSR and its clout.

Expand full comment

I read Skousen until he started calling for a preemptive nuclear strike on North Korea. That's insane. I now trust him about as far as I can throw him. The only thing I miss about his writing is his analysis of all the false flag bombings and shootings in the USA.

Expand full comment

Did anyone note when Putin said he did not understand why the leadership decided to dissolve the USSR?

Expand full comment

I didn't notice that. Skousen's characterization of the Soviet "phony fall" is misleading, probably by design. He wants us to continue to be afraid of the communist boogeyman. I believe "controlled demolition" is a more accurate term. The "Soviet" oligarchs decided it was time to burn down the current system and move on to the next. Just like the oligarchs that currently control the world have begun a controlled demolition of the current "unipolar" "capitalistic" system in order to usher in the "multipolar" technocratic digital slave state. (The US neocons are not going down without a fight though.) Putin is a creature of the system. so any confusion on his part about the Soviet controlled demolition is likely feigned.

Expand full comment

Putin seems to be just the manager of a Chabad owned lawn-mower shop, with Shoigu as the maintenance man and Gerasimov as the foreman of the drivers. Heavenly Jerusalem wants their Ukrainian grass mowed down Israeli style. Afterwards they will give the manager new orders. Possibly, if Bjerknes is right, they will by then have created so much animosity between Russia and the West, that they can proceed to their desired conflict between Leviathan and Behemoth, to leave only the specially Chosen standing, or crawling out of their Epstein type tunnels.

Expand full comment

@RURIKSKYWALKER Would you like to write an article about the claims in this paper

https://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_4467_20801335PBW_21_042_15702

You have claimed that Russian has no foreign intelligence operations and no overseas foreign influence operations. However, I do not think that is accurate. This is a list of various intelligence operations that you may find interest in.

The Russian state has a very long history of cynically using and exploiting the overseas Jewish diaspora for its various ends.

Expand full comment

Yeah they rent out the Jews in the West and the West rents out the Jews in the East. Th jews profit as middlemen. Pretty sure I wrote about this in my articles about conversations with spooks in Russia.

Expand full comment

Hi Rurik, apologies for this comment not being in exactly the right place. Firstly thank you for the amazing work you do - even if it is sometimes depressing I think it is vital for us Westerners to realise that things aren't going much better (or are in some respects worse) in Russia. I wanted to ask if you had any information regarding the Peter the Great conspiracies mentioned in the 'Long Checkmate' article linked in this one? I was looking into this topic a little bit not long ago but I couldn't find that much - do you know the names of any books (in English or Russian) that deal with this? Once again thank you for the fantastic work and consider this a 'vote' for more esoteric/religious content as well. Cheers!

Expand full comment

yes, i think i can find the link on an american alternative history forum that has translated these russian conspiracy theories.

have you heard of the tartaria material?

Expand full comment

Yes I have heard a bit about it - not delved too deeply though. I think the basic idea is interesting (that there were entire kingdoms/civilizations that have been 'airbrushed' out of history) but not sure about the specific claims re Tartaria itself. The link would be great if you do manage to find it, there definetly seems to be something 'off' about Peter (and the way that a lot of Royal families, including Russia's I believe) seemed to come from obscure German principalities, but I hit a brick will when trying to look further into it before!

Expand full comment