I Don't Think Putin and Tucker Got Along

Tucker is Putin's last friend in the American Deep State.

Putin came out the other day with some baffling statements about Tucker and politics in America. Here:

TVSPB:

Russian President Vladimir Putin commented on his recent interview with Tucker Carlson and shared his impressions of an American journalist.

« Carlson – is a dangerous person, I wanted him to ask sharp questions in order to answer as sharply, but he chose another tactic », – the head of state noted in an interview with journalist Pavel Zarubin. He is quoted by the Kremlin press service.

What a bizarre thing to say.

Let us take a moment to remind ourselves why Tucker was even there in the first place.

Putin is portrayed as literally being worse than Hitler in the Western media and this treatment has made it difficult for Western audiences to hear Putin’s message. Most Western journalists refuse to even try to start a dialogue with Putin. A notable exception in recent years was Oliver Stone, who gave Putin a fair shake with his interviews. I recall being disappointed to discover that Putin wasn’t a Communist revisionist or a Russian nationalist but just a typical shitlib who ran Russia like an LLC.

From that point onwards to Tucker’s visit though, there were no long-format talks with Putin. As much as any of this drama is real, Tucker stuck his neck out for Putin to go over there and break the media blockade. Tucker has also positioned himself as the unofficial spokesperson of disaffected patriotic American, voicing the most pointed and hard-biting criticism of the current regime and all of its component parts of any other public commentator of his caliber by far. He is, of course, part of an opposition faction within the Deep State in America, but that is beyond the main point that I am making here.

Some people clearly didn’t seem to understand the context of what was going on with this interview and viewed Tucker as being in opposition to Putin or something and cheered on Putin’s “schooling” of Tucker with his unprofessional performance during the interview. Tucker showed up in Moscow as a friend to Putin with an opportunity to reach the disaffected Western patriot audience with his interview. It was a big opportunity for Putin, and for Russia in general. Instead of saying something that would appeal to disaffected Westerners, something proving that he understood and sympathized with their plight and that he really is the political savior that ZAnon portrays him as, he instead stonewalled and lectured Tucker, refusing to say anything of any interest whatsoever.

No mention of the stolen elections in America. Of the anti-White policies of the ruling class. The dismantling of the American Constitution and the American way of life. There were many issues that he could have touched on with the general underlying message of, “we know that the average American doesn’t hate Russia, it is your illegitimate rulers who are destroying your country while provoking animosity with ours”.

Putin instead focused on whining about the Holocaust and the Duchy of Lithuania for at least half of the interview. I don’t know about you, but I was impressed by his ability to memorize the key points of a Wikipedia article. Yes, his mastery of 16th century history proved to me that we are indeed dealing with the greatest 5D political tic-tac-toe mastermind of the 21st century. My puny mind simply couldn’t comprehend the awesome acumen on display, leading to my jealous disparaging remarks about the interview.

Shame on me.

On a more serious note, it seemed like Putin was annoyed by Tucker during the interview. He acted condescending and smug, for no discernible reason. This, despite the fact that Tucker gave him the floor for the entire first hour, essentially. Unless the tape has been edited deceptively (which is not an allegation that I have heard yet) then Putin could not have asked for a more amiable interviewer.

Tucker literally “let him cook” as the kids like to say nowadays.

Translated from Zoomer-ebonics, the phrase “let him cook” means, as best as we can ascertain, “let the other colored gentleman finish expounding his argument without interruption, please”.

But, according to Putin, this was “a tactic” used by Tucker against him.

Putin implied that Tucker was being combative in some capacity. But what kind of “tactic” is it when you let the other guy speak his mind for as long as he wants? Only this expression comes to mind:

No American remembered any of the history facts that Putin rattled off the next day, by the way. They just walked away from the interview, if they could even force themselves to watch the whole thing, bored and vaguely disappointed that Putin didn’t live up to the hype surrounding him.

But was that Tucker’s fault?

According to the Russian president, Tucker Carlson was surprisingly patient for a Western journalist. Vladimir Putin thanked Carlson for his cooperation, because today it is not possible to conduct a direct dialogue with Western countries.

The Russian president noted that he spoke with Carlson « behind the scenes » about the so-called « Jewish pogroms », which today are a means of demonization of Russia.

In addition, Putin noted that the current generation of Germans should not bear full political responsibility for everything that Nazi Germany did.

This part is so endlessly amusing!

First, let me explain what is being referenced. There was a bizarre psy-op in Dagestan following the start of the genocide in Gaza. Rumors were spread on Whatsapp that a plane full of Israelis was landing in Dagestan and the irate Mohammedans stormed the airport to get their hands on the passengers.

I covered it here:

The goal was, of course, to portray the Kremlin as not sufficiently semitic enough and to “cancel” President Putin Kanye West style. No, I’m not kidding at all here and Putin pleading his case to Tucker about this bizarre incident (of all things to talk about!) proves that this is a big deal to both Putin (FSB/Chabad) and Tucker (CIA/Kabbalist).

No wonder Tucker wore his Kabbalah bracelet to the interview!

Now, Putin knows that America’s number one priority in Russia is the continued prosperity of the Jewish people, who run the government and the economy. I say this without the slightest trace of irony. In fact, I have written a series of articles that alleges that the USSR was detonated because its leaders offended the Jews and their Zionist ambitions in Palestine. You really should read this series. Again, you simply won’t find this secret history of the USSR in English anywhere else.

Start here:

And then read this one:

And here is a quote from one of these essays, about how Putin was threatened by Bush at their first meeting with the loss of MFN trade status for Russia should God’s Chosen have any reason to complain to Washington about his policies.

Before that, Krushchev was treated to a similar dressing down, where he was ordered to do more to allow Soviet Jews to make aliya to the holy land in Israel or in New York. This was, of course, portrayed as “human rights advocacy” by the West, which stayed quiet about the abominable plight of ordinary Russians in the camps, and never budged a finger to help them. I’m actually writing the third installment as we speak by the way, and it is coming together quite nicely.

Go read the first two essays now. Well worth your time. Trust me.

Let’s finish up the news piece:

When asked who is better for Russia, Biden or Trump, Vladimir Putin noted that Biden is a more predictable politician, but Russia is ready to work with any US leader.

The cherry on top, no?

This can only be interpreted in one way. Right after speaking to the de facto leader of disaffected, conservative, White Americans, Putin panicked and felt that he had flown too close to the sun. I watched him make these statements in Russian. There was no irony or sarcasm and even if there were, I’m supposed to believe that my casual readers were able to pick up on it when I get bombarded by emails by irate readers who cannot detect that I am using sarcasm when I say that 6 million Ukrainians were killed in Bakhmut because of an elaborate “Wile E. Coyote style trap by Prigozhin and Shoigu and Putin”.

Yeah right.

No, Putin said and meant it literally.

Oh, you thought that he was MAGA? That he and Trump were going to lock Hillary up in Gitmo together? That he had apprehended Tom Hanks and Oprah Winfrey in the tunnels under Azovstal? Well, time to wake up and smell the roses, chief.

**

I got an accusation (nothing new there) flung my way the other day here on Substack. I only bring it up because of how funny the ensuing exchange was and because it has educational value for all my readers.

So, let’s take it from the top:

Here is my reply followed by the backpedaling:

I’ll skip some of the back and forth now and hone in on the important part:

It occurs to me that maybe this part is not clear to my newer readers.

In the interests of bringing everyone up to speed, I will recap the main argument of this blog about Putin so we are all on the same page and so that everything becomes clearer for everyone.

PAY ATTENTION! YES YOU IN THE BACK! EYES UP FRONT ON THE BLACKBOARD *tap* *tap* I DON”T WANT TO REPEAT MYSELF GOING FORWARD. AND YES, IT WILL BE ON THE TEST!

I am operating under the assumption that Putin is a Western intelligence asset that was put into power to rule Russia as colonial satrapy of the global Zionist occupation government. Specifically, Putin was put into power by his predecessor, Boris Yeltsin, who was a drunken, broken man who willingly acted as America’s puppet in dismantling Russia. When it looked like Yeltsin needed to be replaced, the globalists selected Putin to be his successor. Apart from Yeltsin, who was too out of it at that point, and who had no real power anyway, it was the ex-USSR’s top spook Primakov (real name Finklestein) and his Deep State counter-part Kissinger from the West who picked out and eventually settled on Putin.

I’ve written about this a lot at various points on the blog.

YOu may as well read about it in this essay of mine to get acquainted with the main thrust of the argument. Trust me, it’s funny and you’ll enjoy it. Reading can be fun, actually! At least, I try to make it so:

Now, Tucker’s father was a top-level anti-Soviet CIA propagandist working in Eastern Europe to spread pro-Trotskyist propaganda. His son, Tucker, wanted to join the CIA (Putin seems to hint in the interview that he thinks Tucker did in fact join) but went into the media instead, Operation Mockingbird style. While in the media, Tucker promoted Libertarian nonsense to justify the looting of America’s manufacturing economy and he promoted the Desert Wars that the ethnic neocons engineered to safeguard the interests of Israel.

Tucker 1.0 was totally Trotskyite, through and through, during his first iteration in the media.

But Tucker 2.0 is a populist and almost an isolationist even!

Except when it comes to one country that is: China. I believe that the reason that these pro-Putin types exist at all as a kind of dissident Deep State in America is to convince Russia to join America in a coming conflict with China, or, just as possbly, with Iran.

Let’s just take a quick look at the pro-Putin people in the American Deep State.

Deep State critter Edward Luttwak spilled the beans in his Unherd interview about Russia where he explained that Putin was put into power by the West and that it was foolish to get rid of him now when he could be used against China in the coming war.

Jeffrey Sachs was one of the Harvard boys sent over to loot Russia’s economy in the 90s. And yet, he has become one of the most vocal, high-level pro-Putin voices in Western media calling for an end to NATO’s aggressive attitude towards Russia.

CIA director William Burns has been implicated in several “leaks” in the media alleging that he has pursued backchannel diplomacy with the Kremlin with the goal of de-escalating the conflict.

The Big Z Three I mentioned the other day were all anti-Soviet shills. And then they were activated to provide support for Putin in the “alternative” Western media later in their careers. All three probably had Russian blood on their hands (only Saker foolishly admitted to it, what an idiot) and yet they are now pro-Kremlin.

Think. Why is this the case?

And then there is Colonel Macgregor, also a Deep Stater, with ties to Russian oligarchs, because of course, out there spreading the Z-gospel as well.

…

Others come to mind, but this article is long enough at this point. Some of my casual readers have a hard time with words and whine if I write too much. It cuts into their Torah-study time, I think. If I keep them from their Zionist fairy tales they get cross at me in the comments section and we must be sensitive to their fragile mental state. Yes, if Putin doesn’t save the world from Anal-Globalism and Yeshua doesn’t rise from the dead in the next two weeks they are going to be very cross indeed.

So let me just spell out the final, obvious part out before calling it a day.

No, I don’t think all of these Westerners are “Russian spies” or that they have been turned into FSB assets. I don’t think the FSB is even allowed to recruit Americans because they are a Langley-owned janissary occupation force tasked with keeping populists and nationalists suppressed in Russia.

No, I am dead-certain that these Americans are all card-carrying members of the Zio-American spook state who are having an internal dispute with their more diehard spook state fellows. As Macgregor himself explained to Tucker, the die-hard anti-Russian faction is “from that part of that world” and have a grudge against Russians because of that.

He must be referencing the Buryatians who run the US State Department.

Our pro-Putin people are opposed by “the neocons who have ancestors from Russia” but they also have people “from that part of the world” in their own ranks. The difference is that the pro-Putin people believe that Putin hasn’t outlived his uses just yet. That he can be used to promote Chabad in Russia, against Iran or eventually China. Despite what you have been told, Russia is not allies with either China or Iran, and barely trades with either of them. But that is a topic for another time.

Making sense?

It should.

You can disagree with me, but stop pretending that my argument is too difficult to understand. Because it is not. People who can interpret Shoigu’s blinking during interviews as Morse code giving the go-signal to legions of sleeper cell patriots poised to arrest Barack and Michael Obama are suddenly pretending to be stumped by my articles. How so? Well, they’re actually just pretending to be dumb when it comes to me and my much simpler, saner explanations.

Or maybe they really are that dumb, I don’t know.

The point is that we should all be caught up to speed now. Trust me, there is nothing difficult about my arguments on an intellectual level. The problem exists on an emotional level. It comes from the sinking realization that no one is coming galloping in on a white horse to save us from the brave new world to come.