32 Comments

Really great post. Not only is the right obsessed with "winning", even though what constitutes "winning" always changes to re-define yet another loss, but the utter passivity of the modern right is a sight to behold. I mean, it's hard to blame the passivity after Orange Retard's performance on Charlottesville and 1/6, where he wouldn't even issue pardons to his followers, but the Q movement was really the quintessential distillation of the modern right's worldview -- sit back, Big Things are Happening, you don't have to do anything, just sit on your ass and the Big Boys will make the Winning Happen, and You Get to Participate in the Glory. Operation Trust 2.0. They deserved every loss they ate and more.

Expand full comment

Trump defeats endless parade of straw men just in time for election.

Democrats decide Biden unelectable due to impeachment “Sonofabitch got fired”

Kennedy declares “The worm has turned”

Expand full comment

I do have a couple of points.

Trump would have had no way of knowing the future complete takeover of the legal process by the rogue Attorney General Garland. If Trump had the foreknowledge to issue pardons, he would have pardoned himself. I don't think anyone at that point would have imagined the mass manufacturing of aggravated felonies by the Justice Department under the dictator Biden.

Let me add a bit to the description of right and left. As corollaries of the "winnable" and "whining" nomenclature, I would add the right has the strong tendency of underestimating its opponents. The Duran, Martyanov, and Ritter never get enough of telling us how stupid the US and NATO planners are. The basis for calling Blinken, Schultz, Stolten, and von der Layen stupid is the observation that their policies are disastrous for their countries. The implicit assumption is that these "leaders" care about the well-being of their countries. If you take away that assumption, their policies have arguably been quite successful.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
May 10
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

No problem, no insult taken

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
May 10Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Hi RN, I'm not interested in a hidden idiomatic system of hermetic communication, whatever that means. Dementia Joe stole the presidency, Orange Man's "victories" -- as tiny and pathetic as they were -- have all been rolled back, and we've had 20 million illegal migrants shoved into the U.S. in the past four years with $1 trillion printed every three months and a grand, gay war being fought in Ukraine. On a very basic level Q strung along his readers throughout Trump's term with lots of promises of immediate actions that never came into being. To not become disillusioned with this process after multiple years of it (for those who didn't catch on to this scam early, anyway) speaks to a thought process that needs recalibrating on a fundamental level, imo...

Expand full comment

They’re in the gnarliest and largest cult in American history.

Of any demographic they have the power to defend the public from being hauled off to FEMA camps because government is making them test positive for a fake disease.

Meanwhile these kids can’t quite figure out why they missed Prom, graduation, a few years of their youth.

Expand full comment

It scares me that I knew who you were quoting, but truth is truth. I'm 64 and just now seeing how the game is played. You, Iain Davis, James Corbet, and Richard Grove have been a big help.

Expand full comment

I'm 78 and in somewhat the same situation. I would not make the claim that I know how the game is played, but I can see where my previous assumptions have been incorrect. I can also see there are important players in the game that I never took into account before. As far as knowing how the game is played, I'll pass on that one. The more I find out, the more I see I don't know.

Expand full comment

Excellent Breakdown and Exposure Rurik!

Expand full comment

I was wondering when you would get around to covering this subject. I don't read or listen to the reports , just the headlines but they are all very negative for the Ukys now , even very strong Nazi lovers are afraid.

Expand full comment

Not Khazars but Carthaginians?

The day of Saturn is surely an excellent time to consider the origins of Yahweh's Chosen.

Via Modern Monastery (not an actual monastery but a collection of articles by Catholics), we have this summary of an article (which is hard to find) on Unz review:

https://www.modernmonastery.net/p/religious-implications-of-the-carthaginian

'The theory states that the bulk of modern Jews descend from Carthaginian converts, who began to convert to Judaism following the Roman destruction of Carthage in 146 BC. If this is true, the implications of it for Christians, Jews, and Zionism are numerous and profound.'...

'After the destruction of Carthage by Rome, the defeated and stateless Carthaginians would've found the religion of their devout cousins very attractive, given that it prophesized a Jewish messiah that would save their people. The Carthaginians were also known for being excellent merchants and urban-dwellers, similar to modern day Jews, but quite different from the peasants of Judea. As we will examine below, this theory would also connect modern Jews with the Canaanite ancestors of the Carthaginians.'...

'Ephraim Stern, chairman of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem's Institute of Archaeology, stated that the Phoenicians were the descendants of the Biblical-era Canaanites, some of whom were forced out of Palestine by the Israelites around 1200 BC.3 Already, an incredible irony presents itself. Modern scholars quietly acknowledge that the vast majority of Roman Jews never left Palestine, meaning that modern Palestinians are the closest descendants of the ancient Israelites. Others have already pointed out how ironic it is that the entire Zionist project justifies itself off the claim that they are the descendants of the Israelites, but in reality, they are expelling the actual descendants of the Israelites from the holy land. The Carthaginian theory further deepens this already remarkable irony. Zionist settlers are not just a foreign entity attacking the true Israelites, but are actually the descendants of the people that were cursed and explicitly ordered for removal from the land by God, according to scriptures that religious Zionists themselves believe in. '...

'Despite the distance between Carthage and Phoenicia, the Phoenician Carthaginians retained an unsevered connection with their native religion, and this included the practice of child sacrifice. For many years it was doubted that the Carthaginians actually sacrificed children, but recent findings have provided overwhelming evidence that they did.'...

'The scholarship of Prof. Ariel Toaff shows that this practice also did not end with the destruction of Carthage, and that European Jews practiced child sacrifice well into the Middle Ages. The existence of Carthaginian child sacrifice strongly supports the accounts of Canaanite child sacrifice in the Bible, as well as Toaff's research, and shows a significant link between Rabbinic Judaism and Canaanite paganism.'...

'Shlomo Sela, a professor in the Department of Jewish Thought at Bar Ilan University, analyzed the works of Abraham ibn Ezra, a prominent Medieval Jewish commentator, who wrote a lengthy work attempting to defend the link between the Jews and Saturn. Sela wrote that this link is "historically vouched for in almost all the sources which have been presented above to demonstrate the persistence of the Saturn-Jewish connection from antiquity till the Middle Ages. Thus, both Tacitus and St. Augustine asserted that the Jews made the Sabbath their rest day in order to honor or worship Saturn."'...

'Far from being a simple origin story of the Jewish people, the Carthaginian theory totally recontextualizes thousands of years of Christian-Jewish relations and Biblical history. Zionists would find themselves the villains of their own story, and the past three millennia would look like a continuous tale of combat between the people of God and a wicked Saturnian cult. Instead of a principled commitment to the Hebrew scriptures that Rabbinic Jews claim is their reason for rejecting Christ, the real reason would look more like pagan corruption, combined with an undying grudge against Rome and its Church, which stole their empire from them in the same way that the Israelites banished them from their homeland.'

The original article gives more information about the author Prof. John Beaty a prominent conservative intellectual of the 1940s whose work was suppressed by Jewish influence.

https://www.unz.com/runz/prof-john-beaty-and-the-true-origin-of-the-jews/

There's a lot more there .

Readers of Miles Mathis will be aware of the 'Phoenician Navy', and here we see some of what they get up to in port. The children of the Father of Lies continue to pervert and suppress Truth; so read it before it disappears - and you with it.

Expand full comment

There’s a Substacker called Phoenician hunter that gets into this

Expand full comment

Thank you. Now I see that he does have a lot of interesting articles.

Expand full comment

Shoigu just got shifted as the game of musical chairs leaves observer’s wishing they would just change their tune.

Expand full comment

I like metaphysical realism, ok. As humans kill humans & oligarchs get rich off it & continue to develop terminator drones for the future killing of humans we can argue all day about who has evidence on which side is “winning “ Therefore we are the absurdists, no one wins after all “What does it profit a man to gain the whole earth but lose his immortal soul “ Expendable weapons for forever wars.

Expand full comment

You probably also didn't get acid from Timmothy Leary or electroshock "therapy" multiple times in mind control experiments (did you?) like that guy did either.

Expand full comment
May 12Edited

Hello. Well ... If I've understood the article, I'm willing to doubt I did, we now have two more labels to describe the actions of Humanity. I wonder how many categories exist to classify Human behaviour ? What with all these units of Human value floating around, I would assume that when you're told to think out of the box, you probably just find yourself in another box. My question is ... Who are you when you're against Israel's Final Solution of the Palestinians but you want to watch Real Madrid play the Champions League final and win ?

Expand full comment

In the news:

Strategist, here the cross of Hydrocephalus, a symbol of self-destruction, self-destruction and voluntary degradation, was chosen as the tactical sign of the “North” group, advancing in the Kharkov direction. I think this sign was chosen for a reason

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Оргазм_Нострадамуса?useskin=vector

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3tjEW2NoV4&lc=UgyY9Ha_1O0kaGmG0DB4AaABAg

Expand full comment

Those who complain that RS differs from the 5D guys fail to realise that they are dealing with different levels or markets. The 5D guys consider the technical military and economic levels and there they are correct that Russia is greatly superior and is slowly winning. They may however be in error in assuming that the Russian leadership wishes to pursue what would seem to be the best interests of their people. They know that their own countries are not run in the interests of their peoples, but somehow they assume that the leaders of Russia behave differently, for no clear reason. There is also an 'American' assumption that victory must be achieved as rapidly as possible.

As a rough rule of thumb, you may observe that in big organizations the achievement of their nominal objectives is left to the people at the low and medium levels, who are expected to devote themselves to those objectives. The people at the top however turn it around and devote the organizations to their egos. The 5D guys were mid-level officers or bureaucrats, so they have that mind-set, and that is the level to which most of their readership aspires. (Maybe they didn't become top-level because they assumed their bosses were fools for not just being super-midlevel guys.)

It may be that the Russian leadership is taking a slow and cautious route to victory, chewing through

the Ukrainian military and economic capacities and exhausting those of NATO on the way, without much strain for Russia and avoiding 'Big Arrow' offensives. Update your calendars please, its now 2024, no longer 1944; the Americans can't rule the waves from their aircraft carriers, and the Russians are not crushing all before them as their tank armies rush to Berlin.

It may be that the Russian leadership would rather not have got into this situation and still hope their 'esteemed Western partners' ie the yid oligarchs speaking through their political mouthpieces in Washington, will let them end the conflict. However it looks as they are condemned to victory, slowly killing lots more goyim, even though this may not be in the best interests of the Russian people. Who cares about them? Certainly not the Kremlinoids, and more than their 'Western partners' care about the people they rule.

RS is worth reading because he deals with the top level in Russia and who and what may be behind them. The level of real decisions, where wars are not the main event. Read Simplicius and A Skeptic for the war, and RS and Slavsquat to see how closely aligned the Russian and Western leaders are in their policies.

So far I have not found a better explanation of events in Ukraine than a combination of keeping the Corruption Machine running and the advancement of Heavenly Jerusalem.

Expand full comment

I'm a bit confused by some parts of your post. You say the Russian leadership may be pursuing a strategy of slow victory at minimal cost. You also say this may not be in the best interests of the Russian people. What is your ideal goal, then, entailing both security for Russia and minimal killing of Russian soldiers? In wartime, the well-being of your own troops must take precedence, even if it means killing related people. The best solution, of course, is an accord that avoids the killing and destruction. An example is the US Civil War, where the Confederate underestimation of the Union capability and determination to make war led to the total physical destruction of the South. The better course for the South would have been to negotiate what they could get before the war got intense, and swallow their losses (and their pride).

Expand full comment

I doubt that Lincoln would have allowed a separate South on any terms, since he was committed to the preservation of the Union. All or nothing for both sides. Lots of rhetoric about live free or die.

The justifications promoted to the masses may not be the real motivations of the decision makers.

'War is the sport of kings'.

The 'leaders' in the public eye, may not even devise the policies they parrot. Vide Biden.

Bjerknes may have the best idea of what the people behind the people who puppet the politicians are seeking.

Expand full comment

I totally agree with you that Lincoln would never have agreed to recognizing the Confederacy. So, the South really threw it into the flames when they initiated hostilities against Fort Sumter. They could have drawn out the drama some by strictly avoiding any show of force, but ultimately, they would have to settle for a strong negotiating position inside the Union. Lincoln was more than willing to concede on continuing slavery in already-existing slave states and on enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act. Lincoln would not have agreed to expanding slavery or allowing the South to avoid the tariffs.

I also agree with you that the current "leaders" are sociopaths who don't care in the least about the well-being of their own countrymen.

Expand full comment

Good luck selling “Russia is still losing” Rurik. This absurd screed is unconvincing gobbledygook. Really wish you’d tighten the writing, main points without the repetitive diarrhea.

When Putins army reaches the Dnipir you’ll still be selling this crap, with subs falling off and you’ll become even more embittered. Or perhaps metaphysic realism will save you.. who knows?

Expand full comment

"When Putin's army reaches the Dniepr"?!?!? The Russians can't even fully liberate the DPR/LPR after almost 2.5 years of war--er; the "Special Military Operation".

Expand full comment

We shall see.. won't we?

Expand full comment

If past is prologue, then I wouldn't bet the farm on a successful Shoigu advance.

Expand full comment

Dude the Shoigu could single handedly throat punch every Slav from the third street in (some hamlet in Donetsk) to Keeev before lunch tomorrow. Look at his awards! He's literally the basis for Rambo.

Expand full comment

Banned Hipster wrote in a similar discursive and entertaining style. I wonder what happened to him.

Expand full comment

I knew right wingers were bullshit when they didn’t exercise their Second Amendment rights during lockdowns and then proceeded to cheer on the overturning of Roe V Wade, which is going to expand the medical surveillance state.

The pro Palestinian protesters are sporting masks. In the US.

If you show up wearing a face mask to protest against something like that you’re nothing but an advertisement in fear. Plus, these kids at the colleges waited until graduation to do this—- they have been liked to more than any other generation though, so I hope they know that. How the hell any of them could’ve re-enrolled after the scamdemic shot mandates etc…

Expand full comment

It's an exercise in losing to advocate a violent movement against government mandates. The US government has more than adequate resources to track and eliminate any resistance. People advocating violent resistance to the government are either grossly misled or are actual agents provocateurs.

Guns are essential for protecting yourself against street crime and also for protecting against the violent revolutionary gangs (often in the guise of street gangs) who are operating under secret government approval. The key word is "secret". The government needs to have a vanguard of the revolution, but has to maintain deniability. Hence, guns are useful protection.

Expand full comment

A bunch of opportunities in 2020 were lost or stolen, which start with the diversionary role BLM played with the lockdowns. I have no doubt there are secret "revolutionary gangs" operation with secret government approval... maybe some with veterans who are/were mercenaries.

If the gun owning patriots opposed to the dystopian technocracy can convince the general public that they are standing between them and a FEMA camp or secret armies that cause chaos as you alluded to then we'd be in a better spot.

That's one of the reasons people are being coached to think of each other "group" as the enemy and why some general messages of support and understanding just aren't even broached or understood.

Expand full comment