Putin: We Must Begin Peace Negotiations!

Right on schedule.

SO IT BEGINS!

THE GREAT SURRENDER OF OUR TIME!

I have dedicated so many articles running what if scenarios on what this is and what it will look like that now that we are here, I don’t even know what more I can say. Well, I am a blogger and that means that I can always say something, but what more can I add that’s new that I haven’t said already?

First, here is Putin’s latest speech:

The editors of "Kapital of the Country" (Kapital.ru) have collected the most important statements of Vladimir Putin:

• The situation in Ukraine is a tragedy due to the ongoing hostilities. We need to think about ending the Ukrainian conflict so that fighting on Ukrainian territory stops.

• Russia has never given up on peace negotiations with Ukraine. It was the Kiev regime that publicly announced its withdrawal from the negotiation process.

• The actions of the West led to the collapse of the world economy. Instability in Ukraine was provoked by Western countries, and not by decisions of the Russian Federation.

• The West uses dirty methods to eliminate competitors, such as the destruction of supply chains and even acts of terrorism. A striking example is the undermining of Nord Streams. This is an act of state terrorism

And here come my bulletpoints because I am too tired of repeating myself over and over again on this:

• We have reason to believe that elements of this conflict are managed/agreed upon between the West and Moscow’s leadership. These are the old “Cold War rules” that both sides have admitted to following.

• I have pointed out before that psyops and hoaxes usually run out of steam by the two year mark (peasant credulity curve).

• The Kremlin has failed its stated and unstated aims in Ukraine (unless we mean to cull Russians) and refuses to take measures to actually win.

• Most of Russia’s elite do not want this war and there is immense pressure on Putin to call it off because most of Russia’s oligarchs need access to Western capital and markets.

• The Russian Federation was built by the US to be a “gas station” from which value could be extracted and the population kept impoverished. Very little has been done to change Russia’s role in the greater NWO, even with the SMO.

• This war can be seen as a failed attempt to negotiate better terms with the West for Russia’s oligarchs and spook overclass.

Speaking of spooks. One of the Kremlin leak channels shared news that Putin is planning on creating a new spook organization and expanding the spook state. Here:

While the portrait of one of the creators of SMERSH, Khadzhiumar Mamsurov, is being restored in Vladikavkaz, interesting news has appeared in the media. As they say, symbols and signs.

"Putin is thinking about creating a new intelligence service”

Very strange information has reached us. So strange that we didn’t immediately believe it. Sources in the security agencies are tense - they say the president is thinking of creating a special service that will monitor all currently operating services and bodies. It would seem that there would be even more special services, but such a plan was actually discussed with the president.

According to our data, the ideologist of the creation of the new body is the governor of the Tula region, Alexey Dyumin. He personally handed the president a folder with proposals during one of the meetings and now, as interlocutors in the security agencies hint, the president is almost ready to make such a decision. Dyumin proposed to entrust the new body with both supervision and power functions. Moreover, the general proposes to implement the latter by creating rapid reaction units.

Interesting.

Do you remember who Dyumin is? We covered him before. That is actually the whole point of Chronicles by the way, to be a kind of Wikipedia of important personalities in the Slavlands that the reader can quickly cross-reference.

We spoke about him last when Prigozhin alleged that Dyumin was the architect of the successful seizure of Crimea, not Shoigu, who took credit despite being opposed to the idea. Here:

Dyumin is a serious operator. Crimea was one of the sleekest operations in history, frankly. The world dropped its jaw in awe. The reason for the success? No involvement from the usual suspects in Moscow. This was a strict military op that also relied on military assets already in Crimea.

Such units will be assigned several functions, including the suppression of possible pockets of uprising and separatist manifestations in regions where local security forces cannot control the situation or there is a risk of going over to the side of the rebels. Simply put, Dyumin suggests Putin prepare for protests in the regions. Not obvious, but if you think about it, a logical solution. And it is logical that the top brass of the FSB, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Russian National Guard are not enthusiastic about this idea. Although some are already trying to agree on high positions in the new structure.

However, there is one more nuance. Dyumin conveyed his proposal without the consent of Patrushev. And this can lead to serious consequences."

Again, this is all just rumors. But then again again, these rumors have often been proven true. The Kremlin is leaky because a significant portion of it was against the SMO for various reasons. Some, because they wanted further Western integration. Others, perhaps, because they know that Patrushev or Bortnikov or someone else was leading Putin into a Langley trap based on false intel.

Looking back through the archives I am struck by how much amazing information Rolo, the previous proprietor of this blog, put out there about the spook state in the Slavlands before quitting in disgust. The articles on Prigozhin stole the spotlight though and this other very important side of the Chronicles has gone unappreciated and forgotten. For shame.

You should rectify the situation immediately by becoming a Stalker immediately because I will be posting links to old spook-related paywalled articles to entice you.

Also, the above news leak mentioned SMERSH as a tie-in to the article.

This was kind of the USSR equivalent of the battlefield SS. SMERSH is actually thought of fondly with the older USSR nostalgist crowd. These same people are not too fond of the KGB because no one likes spooks who can end your life on a whim holding that kind of shadowy power over one’s head, but because SMERSH is halo’d by “the Great Patriotic War” they get a pass because people like the military, generally in direct proportion to how much they hate the cops. Since the Kremlin is run by Bolshevik nostalgists, mostly, they might spin it as a SMERSH 2.0 to get the old-timers on board. If you can convince people that the spooks are soldiers and not cops, they’ll take it better. Also, SMERSH was run by Caucasus gangs. Stalin relied heavily on Caucasians gangs to rule over Russia.

This is a classic Xenocrat move. What does it tell you about the current RF government that they are so entangled with caucasus gangs that murder and torture Russians with impunity?

Exactly

And I mention all of this in the context of negotiations.

Talks have been going on behind the scenes, according to anonymous sources that the Western media have reported on. We’re talking monthly visits to do check-ups on Moscow:

So, yes, the news that Russia is talking about negotiations now isn’t surprising at all.

This is being spun as a Russian W though. But where is the W? Is Ukraine “denazified and demilitarized”? What about the fate of Russian speakers? Has Moscow even said or done anything about their situation? The Ukrainian Rada just declared that these people don’t even exist even though a sizeable portion of their own soldiers fighting Moscow are Russian-speakers. The only person who seems concerned about the fate of Russians in Ukraine is Arestovych who we are now calling Arestovich again based on his latest defense of Russians in Ukraine. Here:

- Two major Ukrainian officials at once, Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada Ruslan Stefanchuk, and Language Ombudsman Taras Kremen, decided to work in the field of history and ethnography, and told us amazing news:

- There are no Russian-speaking Ukrainians.

And they are so absent that we will not defend the rights of this group.

That is, the group may exist, but it certainly does not have rights.

Well, not exactly “no rights”, but they shouldn't exist basically.

Something like that.

Because they attacked us, this group committed an act of armed aggression, and so - what rights [for them]?..

These two giants of thought made such a series of amazing discoveries that one can get tired of sorting them out.

For example, I was surprised to learn that now the rights of certain public and national groups are decided on not by the Constitution or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but by officials in their interviews.

And it turns out that the rights that no one, including convicts and prisoners of war, can be deprived of, now easily evaporate, because the official simply “... thinks so.”

But let's focus on one point.

As is known, the nationality of a citizen of Ukraine is established on the basis of his personal certificate.

It is documented in his autobiography and during the census.

Well, since our officials have been afraid to conduct a census for 22 years (two-thirds of the country’s existence as an independent state), I would like to tell them an autobiographical fact:

- I am a Russian-speaking Ukrainian.

What's there:

-[…].

From now on, I ask you to take this fact into account in your statements and formulate them with the appropriate wording:

- We do not have Russian-speaking Ukrainians, and there is no such minority, with the exception of Ukrainian citizen Alexei Arestovich.

Otherwise, I guarantee these officials a small but meaningful debate in the European Court of Human Rights.

I will send the invoice for moral damage to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Well, as a corresponding minority, I have a question for these two men of outstanding intelligence:

- how are the Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada and the Language Ombudsman going to protect my rights?..

What about the 10th and 24th articles of the Constitution?

They should have the balls to publicly declare:

- You know what, we just canceled them.

Who is Arestovich, you ask? Well, I’m sure you can find something in the Chronicles archives if you perform a simple keyword search. I’m not holding your hand on this one. Give it a go on your own. I do my best to write simple, but incisive reports to make the whole learning process FUN!

The whole negotiations situation that we face now could have been worse though.

Russia could have retreated from Zaporozhye. I think that the basic math hasn’t changed much though. The West is killing Russians on a budget and bankrupting the Slavlands. They may want to pivot to Iran or China soon instead because of competing lobbies within America that want to focus the war on the next target before their military power erodes or something like that.

The only real hope for the Slavlands isn’t peace, it is war somewhere else.

I’ve always known this and I was praying that the turbo-Zionists would win the tug-of-war for influence in Washington and start a war instead against Iran instead of in Ukraine. That way, Russia could sell weapons to Iran and also provide the brave foot-soldiers with moral support against the globalist menace.

Putting aside that Moscow is pro-globalism, those of you who so bravely support Russians fighting to free you from globalism or to trigger the end times are anti-Russian, as far as I am concerned.

Also, it sounds like a cliche at this point, but it is very true that America is always at war because they are the mailed glove of globalism and the enforcers of zionism around the world. Even putting aside those two ideological factors, America needs war because of its MIC and its need to maintain the current free trade, oil, reserve currency, open borders, anti-nationalism paradigm in play. Global economic Liberalism is unnatural and can only be enforced by a globalist Leviathan empire that shuts down protectionism in all its forms including national cultures or localized economies that aren’t yet open to exploitation by the megacorporations.

Hey, if I sound like a Communist here, it is because sometimes water is wet, OK?

The Communists aren’t even really against global Liberalism/Capitalism empire. They think that it is paving the way for world Communism because it is destroying all national identity and commodifying culture, creating the amorphous global slave class of the proletariat. Without global Capitalism destroying nationalism and localism and culture, there would be no basis for the proletarian revolution.

“More, please!” is what they say. “Accelerate it!” And, “the worse it is, the better!” And, “the Capitalists will sell us the rope to hang them on!”

BTW: if you see or hear someone speaking like this, they are a Communist.

I am not a Communist, but I do think they are smarter than Liberals and uber-Liberals (Libertarians). If you believe in Liberalism (most of you) then you might want to consider why you’re avowed ideological enemies support what you’re doing and think it is the bee’s knees. Just as a thought experiment.

Speaking of …

Libertarians think that doing away with government will fix the market and make it free. But the same ethnic mafias will simply corner the “free” market within 10 years, tops. This is because there are no permanently free markets and because power and economic might tends towards consolidation, always. This is what is “natural” not constant competition. Perfect competition doesn’t just continue in stasis forever because this isn’t a Nature documentary and nature metaphors are just that — poetic flights of fancy. Sometimes, invasive species move in and kill off everything in the ecosystem. You need to deal aggressively with invasive species to keep your garden/economy diverse and balanced. Doing nothing and trusting the “Invisible hand” is demonstrably retarded, not “natural” as in based on nature or primitive communities somewhere. Metaphor: your garden won’t last long without a gardener tending to it. The reason why we are even talking about automatic systems that can thrive without human intervention via the government is because we are actually talking about the Anglo conception of God. They really embraced the whole absentee architect/gardener concept because they embraced “Empiricism” i.e., Nominalism/materialism and their metaphysical errors infected the rest of their thinking.

I blame Plato, of course, with his craftsman god that retired from the scene to whom our prayers fall on deaf ears concept that the Christians then made into a messianic semitic fairytale.

The truth is that we are conduits of Logos into the universe. Without us, the whole thing falls to entropy and decay, not stasis. This is why the anti-human agenda of the environmentalists is whack as well, speaking metaphysically. Humans aren’t a virus (don’t exist) or a plague, we are live conduits of Logos into the world. We make things beautiful simply by existing and appreciating the beauty. And by humans, I mean Russians here, of course, not other groups.

For example: Uzbeks do not make the world a beautiful place.

Yes, our actions on this plane combat entropy. Because of our connection to the higher realms, we are able to bring fresh energy into a closed ecosystem that would eat itself into decay without our presence. All ecosystems require at least some input from without. So, like our planet requiring the Sun, our reality requires Logos to shine in on it as well. And not just Logos, by the way. Logos is one concept of many, possibly infinite concepts floating around in the noosphere and shining down on us like the invisible rays of a black sun or something.

Point being: the only way that an “Invisible hand” could keep a market free and competitive (and by extension, the political system as well) is if the term actually refers to a shadowy cabal working behind the scenes to keep this artificial equilibrium intact. Again: Leviathan. And this is the observable reality of our world as well: Liberalism is kept in place because of first British and then American military might prying open markets and keeping them open to the globalist trade set-up.

If you want an end to industrialized, global war for mercantile interests, you do need to put an end to Liberalism. The world will revert back to smaller, scaled down communities relying on protectionism and nationalism to structure their affairs, not membership in a global trade assembly line where they contribute just one part.

True peace is a pipe dream, of course, but there is a kind of temporary peace that is often possible following war or different kinds of war that can be encouraged or discouraged.

I was always struck by the wise words of Morihei Ueshiba, who was the founder of the gentle, internal martial art of Aikido and who was a member of an ultra-nationalist clandestine right-wing death squad organization led by a 19th century self-styled witch-medium. Yes, seriously, look it up. After returning from an expedition to Mongolia to find the grave of Ghenghis with the goal of unleashing him on the world, O Sensei wrote that true peace was only possible once Japan had conquered the world and subjected it to the rule of the Emperor. I largely agree with this sentiment, and do believe that peace would be possible for awhile once all non-Japanese were exterminated and global Japanism was instituted around the world.

At least for awhile.

After a period of peace that could actually last as long as the period of peace following unification in Japan under the Tokugawas or even longer, lasting millennia, I imagine that some kind of strife would eventually descend on global Japan. Some sort of civil war based on ideology or nascent regionalism leading to ethnogenesis and a new identity would emerge, leading to a renewal of conflict. O Sensei was a smart man and probably understood this as well, as well as the impossibility of an ethnic eradication campaign given the military limitations of Japan at the time. This is why he elected to spread Japanism as a kind of religion instead, and to make his students “spiritually Japanese” instead.

Me, I consider myself more “spiritually Japanese” than “spiritually Jewish” like most Christians do because I watched their cartoons as a kid and because I was impressed by O Sensei’s revelation regarding his possession by a golden spirit of light and warmth and power while training in the mountains as chronicled in his diary. I assume it was the entity that Abrahamists call Lucifer, who is the inspiration for another beloved character of mine, the God-Emperor of Mankind.

Oops, wrong one:

My point is that smart people have sort of war-gamed out the whole “world peace” thing and what it would look like. And no, diffusion of power across many regional squabbling entities is not what world peace looks like. A kind of global or even galactic Imperium is more like the end scenario. One that tragically falls to internal chaos eventually as well, naturally, for cosmic plot reasons.

I’m not against Unification in principle, but I am against the kind of unification effort that we see occurring now.

In short, I don’t want to live in peace under a globalist government run by my enemies. If me and mind were in control, then sure, we’d make the whole world “spiritually slavic” and exterminate anyone who opposed us, just like the Anglos did with their empire and the Romans before them and the You-Know-Whos who are doing it to us right now. Semitism in its various flavors like Christianity or Islam also preaches that world peace is only possible after conversion or conquest of the entire world. That is what is mean when they wish “peace upon you”. It is like American southerners saying “bless your heart,” really. It is a veiled threat. Yes, once the world is subjugated to Yahweh/Allah or to Aikido, a period of peace would descend upon the planet.

But for us, this kind of peace would be worse than a bloody war.

I’d prefer that the Russians rose up and started fighting back against the Muslims who are being imported in by the government like the Irish are doing right now. Does that mean that I am an evil person? A terrorist? An ‘ism/ite? Sure, that is what the current arbiters of morality have decided to label people like myself so who am I to disagree with them? If they have more money than me and can keep me locked up in a cage long enough to make me confess that I am, then I am, and that becomes our reality.

Consider the recent ad released by the Kremlin depicting a devout Muslim invader helping the FSB arrest a Russian terrorist. Here:

The hero of the ad is looked down upon by the racist Russians who he selflessly saves. You can’t make this shit up. Literal SJWism being pushed by the FSB.

They hold power, so they decide who is good and who is bad. There is no other qualification to morality to be found anywhere else. Morality is relative to power. Once you understand that, you also understand that you don’t need morality and by that I don’t mean that you should be antisocial or rude or whatever. No, what I am saying is that you have something better: Identity. So, instead of worrying what is “good” or “bad” or concepts like “world peace” just think instead “is it good for me and mine?”

You recoil though. You wince, reflexively.

That is because you have been conditioned to not think about the interests of you and yours. Can’t have that in the NWO that they are building that is set up to disenfranchise you and yours, now can we? Despite this, you know that you want to and you can sometimes feel your instincts rise to the fore despite your own self-conditioning. The choice is clear: should you reassert your identity, you would become a “bad” person. You don’t trust yourself, hell, you loath yourself because you’ve done a lot of unbecoming things to get ahead in this life or even just to tread water. It is so much easier to let a priest or the TV grant you goodness because you are too guilt-wracked to assert yourself anymore. And even if you did, you know that this would be noticed and you would be punished for doing so. Others around you depend on you. Isn’t their happiness worth more than your assertion of self? Sacrifice is a noble goal is it not? Chasing after some phantom ideology? The Kingdom of Heaven come? Oh yes, you tell yourself that you are taking the high road, the difficult road, but you and I both know that you are taking the coward’s road. That’s why you’re miserable. Righteous, vindicated, Saved!, and yet totally checked-out mentally. Asleep at the wheel. Ghost-walking through this valley of tears. More machine than man.

Wake up.

Wake UP!

WAKE UP!!!

…

But wait, wait.

Why am I writing this screed?

Because I’ll be DAMNED if I write another article trying to explain why Zanon is wrong about everything. God forbid I should write something actually interesting and maybe even useful to peoples’ lives for once. You can’t effect Putin being a traitor or a retard and Zelensky being Jewish, but you can start rediscovering your identity and doing Aikido, at least.

As for predictions regarding peace negotiations, I direct you again to the search function available on this blog.