The pyramids also served as spacefaring battleships, here's a picture from circa-1200BC of two of them orbiting Earth (which is clearly not flat as you can see).
I don't think it's unusual or surprising to see the difference in the military awards stats between Russians and non-Russians in the USSR. It's about morale. Imagine you're a Vilnius native, growing up before the WWs. Your father's insurrection against the Tsarist Russia and the attempt to restore the country has failed miserably, so you get to grow up with half of your family (the other half being sent to Siberia) during the Russification, you see colonists of foreign tongue and faith sent to your neighborhood as punishment, take beatings in school for speaking your language, etc. You somehow manage to restore independence after Russia weakens in WW1. Then they come again, this time as atheist homo-revolutionaries, and you lose family members to the red terror campaign and then a toe fighting near Grodno. You somehow manage to win and spend two decades in relative peace, only to lose it again to another Soviet invasion in 1939. It's not rocket science to figure out why your sons won't be the most enthusiastic fighters when they are conscripted by the Soviets to fight for them two years later.
Ukrainians, too, had compelling reasons not to be enthusiastic when told to fight for USSR: recent Soviet-Ukrainian war, dekulakization, collectivization, Holodomor… This led to Western Ukrainians mounting probably the most effective and bloodiest, multi-year resistance to the Red Army in the region which resulted in hundreds of thousands military deaths, top brass assassinations, massive civilian deportations, etc.
I'm sure others had their reasons, too, and it's certainly not all about not speaking Russian or being a pussy who doesn't know how to fight. All those horror stories from Soviet military memoirs about facing Latvians in Courland and Ukrainians in Galicia in 1944-1945 don't seem to suggest that. I don't think it's so hard to understand even the other nations who pretended (?) to be lazy or stupid: the Empire with a distant capital somewhere in Europe who conquered us not that long ago calls us to fight for them? Fuck them, let's just survive this somehow, play dumb, whatever.
BTW, as per Rusich stats, as with any stats, it's a matter of how you present them. If you merge all Eastern Slavs and call them Russian, as they did (or worse, as it's often the case, call all USSR nations Russian), you get one picture. If you take them apart, you get a different picture, like Russian military deaths being just over a half of all Soviet military deaths, or Belarusian total death rate being more than twice that of the Russian total death rate, or Armenian soldier death rate being almost twice that of the Russian soldier death rate, etc.
P.S. I don't mean to chest-thump or make chauvinistic remarks with this comment - just offering one non-Russian alternative view…
P.P.S. richer colors don't go well with fair skin with cool undertones. Your fair skin would need to have warm (yellow/peachy) undertones to make this work.
Correct, these conflicts really are much more complex than how its made out to be in this article and I'm sure Rurik knows this. I'm not German or Baltic or Russian, etc. so he can say whatever he wants, not my battle. I appreciate the interesting perspective but personally I'm reading this with a grain of salt.
I had (still have, somewhere) one of my WW2 (French) magazine with an article about the Red Army and it's ethnic composition and casualty rate by ethnicity, party membership and all that, I remember that obviously the army was mostly ethnic Russian as were the casualties (about 70-75% IIRC) and after that came Ukrainians and Belorussians, wish I could confirm that but it must be in storage somewhere and I'm certainly not going to search for it just to make sure.
I remember that magazine admitting that their issues featuring a Panzer sold far better than the others, afterwards came the issues featuring a Wehrmacht soldier, but they didn't want to overuse those covers because it would be "fascist" or something.
I remember vaguely a nationalist Ukrainian guy in a 90s documentary (I think it was "Russia's War Blood Upon The Snow", I could be completely wrong though) explaining that he and others like him at first collaborated with the Germans who they thought were their liberators, they quickly realized it wasn't the case so he joined a nationalist Ukrainian group who thought against them, and later the same group ended up fighting the Soviets when they too came to "liberate" them, there was no good side to choose except your own I guess, but that too obviously resulted in disaster.
We non-Teutons might think of Goethe and Schopenhauer as titans of German cultures, but in NS times they were downplayed as "cosmopolitans" i.e. they did not think Germany was the summit of science and culture. Basically, they hated Prussians. Schopenhauer was, typically for him, a great hater of Berlin, where the charlatan Hegel ruled, filling the minds of students with the state religion of the State as God, and the notion that Christianity was a good first step to the ultimate truth, Hegelianism. A letter of his includes this: "A lot of suicides in Berlin? Better believe it; it's a physically and morally damnable dump."
Good fashion/style critique of SS leather style, especially suspenders. Track suits all the way now! As a USA dope I can't follow the intricacies of all the racial groups and factions but somehow you seem confident when explaining all of them. Great as usual!
Ditto here on the the garish colours, swirls, stripes and pagan symbols. Hence the choice of my profile pic.
Hey what about the Russian film "Captain Volkonogov Escaped", released a couple of years ago Rurik? I gather you're probably aware of it. That has a strange retro-futuristic look about it. The NKVD thugs wear both the garish red gopnik tracksuits and the black leather jackets. Interesting film IMO, shows how the spook thugs terrorise the people and each other. Plus the metaphysical aspects of the the film, all be it grounded in Christian morality.
It's got a bit of a "Stalker" Tarkovsky aesthetic as well, check it out people if you can find the complete film online. Below is a taste I quickly found on YT,
Is the Kremlin worried about German Taurus to Ukraine and starting to panic?
Nobody is panicking.
The Taurus cruise missiles, this much is clear to anyone informed about the issue, will not be a game-changer (an overused expression).
First of all, as with almost every Western weapons system delivered to Ukraine, the Ukrainians will likely receive a downgraded version of the Taurus. It will still be capable enough to cause the Russians a lot of trouble, but it’s unlikely to be effective against high-value strategic targets far behind enemy lines.
Standing where Putin's troops wanted to be today-but aren't.
Still, it’s a weapon superior to anything Ukraine currently operates. And given their tactical brilliance, I wouldn’t be surprised if Ukrainian engineers find a way around its limitations. If you can shoot down a Russian jet with an old missile launched from a sea drone, then quite literally, not even the sky is the limit.
If I were the Russians, I’d be concerned. I’d also be worried about the overall direction this war is taking. Their forces have spent weeks trying to reach the administrative borders of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast—an intended “gift” for Putin ahead of today’s May 9th celebrations—but they’ve utterly failed.
The war isn’t going well for Putin right now, and the Taurus will only make things worse. Of course, anything can happen in war, it’s always a cycle of ups and downs, but at the moment, there’s far too much down movement for Putin to feel at ease. There’s not much for Russia to celebrate today.
What military capabilities does Russia have that the USA doesn't?
Taking the heaviest casualties and continuing to fight.
We can only assume what a U.S. Army tank battalion would do after 90% of its tanks have been destroyed.
As we’ve seen in Ukraine, the Russians often carry on with their attacks even when there are only a few people and vehicles left.
These attacks often seem senseless, and most of the time, they certainly are, but in a few situations, a soldier needs to be ready to die to reach an important objective.
The leftovers of a Russian combat vehicle. The Russians, but also the Ukrainians, often fight to the last man; a military virtue that is underappreciated in the West. (Picture by the author of this post)
Again, I highly doubt that, except for a few Special Operations Forces, U.S. soldiers would be able to pull that off. Of course, the same goes for all other Western military forces: that dying is part of a soldier’s job description is often forgotten.
The Russians have this willingness to sacrifice themselves, and so do the Ukrainians. With our armies in the West, we don't know. Let's hope that our soldiers will never be put to the test.
One of the worst aspects of war is that those who might otherwise become close friends must attempt to kill each other. Though too many Ukrainians hate Russians, others are often relatives. Literally!
Those who promote and create warfare, particularly for personal or similar reasons, are a scum which plagues humanity.
Rurik - if you could do an article expanding on fascism and why it is not a real ideology would be grateful. Also wondering if you agree that hitler was controlled opposition? Thanks
" The Russians have this willingness to sacrifice themselves, and so do the Ukrainians. With our armies in the West, we don't know. Let's hope that our soldiers will never be put to the test. "
You are wrong, the only way to end ZioAmerican domination is to put its military and society to that exact test. It will entertaining to watch the the US soldiers, composed of gays, Latinos, simians, feminists , and deluded TV soldiers, shit themselves the first time they encounter a swarm of drones heading their way or the US population having to live in bunkers for days on end. Its the only way they will wake up.
Real estate signs in front of houses used to have some color in them.
After Covid, I started noticing all of the Blackrock signs in the area were a basic black and grey with no embellishment. Ominous looking. Century 21 followed suit and now it seems like the standard format for real estate icons is the black, grey, brown motif. Of course it's ugly, but everyone is doing it. It makes the red, white and blue Remax balloon icon look clownish. Maybe clownish isn't bad.
Aesthetics really are the bottom line, aren't they.
🇷🇺❌🇺🇦🕊❓Russia sets condition for ceasefire in Ukraine
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that Russia would agree to a 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine only if the United States and European countries halt all arms deliveries to Kyiv.
This declaration comes amid renewed diplomatic efforts and intensified fighting in eastern Ukraine. Moscow insists that Western military support is prolonging the conflict and undermining any chance for peace.
No response yet from Washington or European leaders.
@DefenseInformer
JUST IN - Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) threatens Russia with tougher sanctions and "massive" military aid for Ukraine if the country refuses a ceasefire.
"I don't think that there is such a [moral] standard though." Then further down, you answer: "The winner decides who was the more moral in any war, so it is a moot point[?], frankly."
His point is that there is no real moral standard but the winner(s) invent one afterwards, I think at least, that way your population is convinced that they (and their rulers especially) were always the good guys and justified in whatever they have done to the defeated (and to their subjects too).
My point is that the morals of sane adult human beings is proven by their survival through ages. Of course, this could mean that Jew methods should be considered a benchmark for morality. However, their sanity, and now continuity, is questionable. Are they even of our species?
They're not superhumans, but how did they manage to rule the world (or at the very least most of it) is a bit unclear to me, even if you try to follow dissidents and their analyses it still seems lacking, now some think they're a front to the real rulers in a semi-hidden, semi-public form, I have difficulties believing that but who knows in this clown world in which we're living.
But yeah the duty of the rulers of a people (and said people too) should be their survival first and foremost, I'd like for that to be possible without being genocidal psychos but that should be their first prerogative. They are good at survival for sure, even if they obviously changed as they spread across the world, their leaders are complete psychos though obviously.
" They are good at survival for sure, even if they obviously changed as they spread across the world, their leaders are complete psychos though obviously. "
I'm well aware that the co-funder of Netflix is related to Bernays and Freud, but even Freud is relatively recent history, the question is why were they given so much power even under the Roman Empire (and I mean pre-Christian conversion), why Charlemagne gave them complete control of the economy (a fact barely mentioned on his English Wikipedia page, completely absent of the French page, even though Charlemagne didn't even reign over England).
You could go the Miles Mathis way who explains that the Phoenicians/Israelites/Jews just took control of the world by marrying with the local elites and every person of importance in history is a member of the Tribe (yeah Caesar, Genghis Khan, the whole NSDAP leardship, the freaking Vikings, the list goes on and on...), I mean that's an explanation but I doubt it, I also don't think it's as simple as Paul (Saul) invented Christianity and eventually the Christians prostrated themselves to their "Elder Brothers of the Faith" and just let them run thing, I certainly don't have the answer that's for sure.
As to the Occult, well I've never seen anything in my life that could be explained by some form of occult interference, even if it does indeed exists why would they be the best at that ?
" , the question is why were they given so much power even under the Roman Empire (and I mean pre-Christian conversion) "
The answer is they weren't. Prior to per-Christian Rome , and even after, they were just another of many groups that pissed people off and got punished for it. Similar to how Muslims act when they enter non-Muslim societies.
" why Charlemagne gave them complete control of the economy "
This is probably a result of Christianity as it forbade its adherents from lending money at interest but didnt forbid them from borrowing money at interest. This conveniently allowed the small hats to monopolize that field and get filthy rich, leading to other outcomes. Christianity also kept its population uneducated and superstitious severely lowering the pool of people competent in economics. Hence, the small hats stepped in and offered their knowledge and services to naive Charlemagne who because of Christianity probably trusted the silver tongues of the "chosen".
" , even if it does indeed exists why would they be the best at that ? "
This is a complex topic I will just touch on a tiny part . To start they arent the best however through their constructed / corrupted religions forbid most other groups from even entertaining that such things are possible. Even our Science has been intentionally corrupted by the small hats to prevent people from investigating other possibilities of our reality here. Any unapproved research is conspiracy theory, or tin foil hat material.
In Christianity anything outside the allowed is Demons, witchcraft or sinful.
Meanwhile the small hats get fed a diet of supremacism , the Zohar, The Babylonian Talmud, Khabbalh, Sefer Yetzirah , economics, and tribalism.
"...Phoenicians/Israelites/Jews just took control of the world by marrying with the local elites..."
This would be one side of an 'global deep state merchant empire behind the thrones since ancient times' (the seefaring side). The connected land-trade side would be the Silk Road:
Read further down about Jews / 'Achaemenid Corporate Empire' here:
Indeed, we need to have an aesthetic discussion of the leadup to WWII, not another tedious "moral" one. Hopefully this post will lead to much discussion here.
I was not really buying the anti-black story until you mentioned Kay or Ke or whatever he's calling himself, and then it all fit together. Whitey loves Nazis, but it's really for darkies, and people are starting to catch on. Same with Christianity; it's population center is in Africa now, as it was originally; the whole European "Christendom" thing was a big mistake.
But note that the Nazis were originally Brownshirts; they HQ became known as the Brown House. Seems Rohm bought up surplus Afrika Corps uniforms (Germany no longer having African colonies or even an overseas army) for the SA. So even the Brown came from Africa.
Note that Greek statues were originally brightly painted, the "white marble" look being a result of erosion.
I've always wondered about how in They Live, the "real world" seen through the glasses is black & white. I suppose color works with the brainwashing, or the loss of color is due to the the de-washing process; obviously it's just a budget friendly special effect, but it does seem to fit in with the whole color=false trope, as in the phrase "black and white" to mean gritty truth.
That's NLF favorite TV show, far from being mine but I liked it quite a lot, shame they canceled it and rushed the ending. The statues and and temples and whatnot in their "bleached" version look far cooler frankly to me, but I'd imagine that living during those times that would have been depressing, still better than colors everywhere to my taste anyway.
As much as they loathe all things White and fellate all things simian, its a mystery why, these channels, never make any shows about the great cultures of, pre Muslim and European contact, sub-Saharan Africa. I wonder why ;)
Slavs used to build pyramids and levitate using their minds until the evil Germans took it all away and made them drink fire water.
PREACH
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTgdl1M4FihuDB2_88cnY9UaVlTFL042UfFgA&s
The pyramids also served as spacefaring battleships, here's a picture from circa-1200BC of two of them orbiting Earth (which is clearly not flat as you can see).
I don't think it's unusual or surprising to see the difference in the military awards stats between Russians and non-Russians in the USSR. It's about morale. Imagine you're a Vilnius native, growing up before the WWs. Your father's insurrection against the Tsarist Russia and the attempt to restore the country has failed miserably, so you get to grow up with half of your family (the other half being sent to Siberia) during the Russification, you see colonists of foreign tongue and faith sent to your neighborhood as punishment, take beatings in school for speaking your language, etc. You somehow manage to restore independence after Russia weakens in WW1. Then they come again, this time as atheist homo-revolutionaries, and you lose family members to the red terror campaign and then a toe fighting near Grodno. You somehow manage to win and spend two decades in relative peace, only to lose it again to another Soviet invasion in 1939. It's not rocket science to figure out why your sons won't be the most enthusiastic fighters when they are conscripted by the Soviets to fight for them two years later.
Ukrainians, too, had compelling reasons not to be enthusiastic when told to fight for USSR: recent Soviet-Ukrainian war, dekulakization, collectivization, Holodomor… This led to Western Ukrainians mounting probably the most effective and bloodiest, multi-year resistance to the Red Army in the region which resulted in hundreds of thousands military deaths, top brass assassinations, massive civilian deportations, etc.
I'm sure others had their reasons, too, and it's certainly not all about not speaking Russian or being a pussy who doesn't know how to fight. All those horror stories from Soviet military memoirs about facing Latvians in Courland and Ukrainians in Galicia in 1944-1945 don't seem to suggest that. I don't think it's so hard to understand even the other nations who pretended (?) to be lazy or stupid: the Empire with a distant capital somewhere in Europe who conquered us not that long ago calls us to fight for them? Fuck them, let's just survive this somehow, play dumb, whatever.
BTW, as per Rusich stats, as with any stats, it's a matter of how you present them. If you merge all Eastern Slavs and call them Russian, as they did (or worse, as it's often the case, call all USSR nations Russian), you get one picture. If you take them apart, you get a different picture, like Russian military deaths being just over a half of all Soviet military deaths, or Belarusian total death rate being more than twice that of the Russian total death rate, or Armenian soldier death rate being almost twice that of the Russian soldier death rate, etc.
P.S. I don't mean to chest-thump or make chauvinistic remarks with this comment - just offering one non-Russian alternative view…
P.P.S. richer colors don't go well with fair skin with cool undertones. Your fair skin would need to have warm (yellow/peachy) undertones to make this work.
Correct, these conflicts really are much more complex than how its made out to be in this article and I'm sure Rurik knows this. I'm not German or Baltic or Russian, etc. so he can say whatever he wants, not my battle. I appreciate the interesting perspective but personally I'm reading this with a grain of salt.
I had (still have, somewhere) one of my WW2 (French) magazine with an article about the Red Army and it's ethnic composition and casualty rate by ethnicity, party membership and all that, I remember that obviously the army was mostly ethnic Russian as were the casualties (about 70-75% IIRC) and after that came Ukrainians and Belorussians, wish I could confirm that but it must be in storage somewhere and I'm certainly not going to search for it just to make sure.
I remember that magazine admitting that their issues featuring a Panzer sold far better than the others, afterwards came the issues featuring a Wehrmacht soldier, but they didn't want to overuse those covers because it would be "fascist" or something.
I remember vaguely a nationalist Ukrainian guy in a 90s documentary (I think it was "Russia's War Blood Upon The Snow", I could be completely wrong though) explaining that he and others like him at first collaborated with the Germans who they thought were their liberators, they quickly realized it wasn't the case so he joined a nationalist Ukrainian group who thought against them, and later the same group ended up fighting the Soviets when they too came to "liberate" them, there was no good side to choose except your own I guess, but that too obviously resulted in disaster.
Estonians are shown as both German and Russian troops in this dramatic WWII movie: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1944_(film).
The scene where Russian troops get the drop on the Germans is striking!
We non-Teutons might think of Goethe and Schopenhauer as titans of German cultures, but in NS times they were downplayed as "cosmopolitans" i.e. they did not think Germany was the summit of science and culture. Basically, they hated Prussians. Schopenhauer was, typically for him, a great hater of Berlin, where the charlatan Hegel ruled, filling the minds of students with the state religion of the State as God, and the notion that Christianity was a good first step to the ultimate truth, Hegelianism. A letter of his includes this: "A lot of suicides in Berlin? Better believe it; it's a physically and morally damnable dump."
Good fashion/style critique of SS leather style, especially suspenders. Track suits all the way now! As a USA dope I can't follow the intricacies of all the racial groups and factions but somehow you seem confident when explaining all of them. Great as usual!
My grandpa told me stories about how even Galician SS recruits refused to wear suspenders and were beaten for it by the MPs.
It's anecdotes like this that spice up the stew. Thx.
“It would be more accurate to call the Deep State “Trotskyite” than “Fascist” or “Satanist” or “Anal-Saxon” for that matter.” Correct!
Track suit fascists? You may be onto something there. Buff goys on ‘roids
Ditto here on the the garish colours, swirls, stripes and pagan symbols. Hence the choice of my profile pic.
Hey what about the Russian film "Captain Volkonogov Escaped", released a couple of years ago Rurik? I gather you're probably aware of it. That has a strange retro-futuristic look about it. The NKVD thugs wear both the garish red gopnik tracksuits and the black leather jackets. Interesting film IMO, shows how the spook thugs terrorise the people and each other. Plus the metaphysical aspects of the the film, all be it grounded in Christian morality.
It's got a bit of a "Stalker" Tarkovsky aesthetic as well, check it out people if you can find the complete film online. Below is a taste I quickly found on YT,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd9jE2zCCBI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkpHaYXcgPw
Ok I’ll take a look thanks
Roland Bartetzko
·
Follow
Logistics in Ukraine (2022–present)Fri
Is the Kremlin worried about German Taurus to Ukraine and starting to panic?
Nobody is panicking.
The Taurus cruise missiles, this much is clear to anyone informed about the issue, will not be a game-changer (an overused expression).
First of all, as with almost every Western weapons system delivered to Ukraine, the Ukrainians will likely receive a downgraded version of the Taurus. It will still be capable enough to cause the Russians a lot of trouble, but it’s unlikely to be effective against high-value strategic targets far behind enemy lines.
Standing where Putin's troops wanted to be today-but aren't.
Still, it’s a weapon superior to anything Ukraine currently operates. And given their tactical brilliance, I wouldn’t be surprised if Ukrainian engineers find a way around its limitations. If you can shoot down a Russian jet with an old missile launched from a sea drone, then quite literally, not even the sky is the limit.
If I were the Russians, I’d be concerned. I’d also be worried about the overall direction this war is taking. Their forces have spent weeks trying to reach the administrative borders of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast—an intended “gift” for Putin ahead of today’s May 9th celebrations—but they’ve utterly failed.
The war isn’t going well for Putin right now, and the Taurus will only make things worse. Of course, anything can happen in war, it’s always a cycle of ups and downs, but at the moment, there’s far too much down movement for Putin to feel at ease. There’s not much for Russia to celebrate today.
Roland Bartetzko
·
Follow
Logistics in Ukraine (2022–present)Wed
What military capabilities does Russia have that the USA doesn't?
Taking the heaviest casualties and continuing to fight.
We can only assume what a U.S. Army tank battalion would do after 90% of its tanks have been destroyed.
As we’ve seen in Ukraine, the Russians often carry on with their attacks even when there are only a few people and vehicles left.
These attacks often seem senseless, and most of the time, they certainly are, but in a few situations, a soldier needs to be ready to die to reach an important objective.
The leftovers of a Russian combat vehicle. The Russians, but also the Ukrainians, often fight to the last man; a military virtue that is underappreciated in the West. (Picture by the author of this post)
Again, I highly doubt that, except for a few Special Operations Forces, U.S. soldiers would be able to pull that off. Of course, the same goes for all other Western military forces: that dying is part of a soldier’s job description is often forgotten.
The Russians have this willingness to sacrifice themselves, and so do the Ukrainians. With our armies in the West, we don't know. Let's hope that our soldiers will never be put to the test.
One of the worst aspects of war is that those who might otherwise become close friends must attempt to kill each other. Though too many Ukrainians hate Russians, others are often relatives. Literally!
Those who promote and create warfare, particularly for personal or similar reasons, are a scum which plagues humanity.
Rurik - if you could do an article expanding on fascism and why it is not a real ideology would be grateful. Also wondering if you agree that hitler was controlled opposition? Thanks
" The Russians have this willingness to sacrifice themselves, and so do the Ukrainians. With our armies in the West, we don't know. Let's hope that our soldiers will never be put to the test. "
You are wrong, the only way to end ZioAmerican domination is to put its military and society to that exact test. It will entertaining to watch the the US soldiers, composed of gays, Latinos, simians, feminists , and deluded TV soldiers, shit themselves the first time they encounter a swarm of drones heading their way or the US population having to live in bunkers for days on end. Its the only way they will wake up.
https://telegra.ph/9-May-and-the-religion-of-Soviet-civilization-05-07
is there any reliable way to search for telegra.ph posts if you don't use Telegram ?
Real estate signs in front of houses used to have some color in them.
After Covid, I started noticing all of the Blackrock signs in the area were a basic black and grey with no embellishment. Ominous looking. Century 21 followed suit and now it seems like the standard format for real estate icons is the black, grey, brown motif. Of course it's ugly, but everyone is doing it. It makes the red, white and blue Remax balloon icon look clownish. Maybe clownish isn't bad.
Aesthetics really are the bottom line, aren't they.
World War Now:
🇷🇺🇺🇦⚡- "Britain and Trump will increase military aid to Ukraine if Putin refuses to cease fire," - Keir Starmer, Prime Minister of the UK.
🇷🇺🇺🇦⚡- "If Russia does not agree, a new package of sanctions is already ready, together with the US," - Emmanuel Macron, President of France.
🇷🇺❌🇺🇦🕊❓Russia sets condition for ceasefire in Ukraine
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that Russia would agree to a 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine only if the United States and European countries halt all arms deliveries to Kyiv.
This declaration comes amid renewed diplomatic efforts and intensified fighting in eastern Ukraine. Moscow insists that Western military support is prolonging the conflict and undermining any chance for peace.
No response yet from Washington or European leaders.
@DefenseInformer
JUST IN - Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) threatens Russia with tougher sanctions and "massive" military aid for Ukraine if the country refuses a ceasefire.
@disclosetv
"I don't think that there is such a [moral] standard though." Then further down, you answer: "The winner decides who was the more moral in any war, so it is a moot point[?], frankly."
Victory. Winning. Survival!
His point is that there is no real moral standard but the winner(s) invent one afterwards, I think at least, that way your population is convinced that they (and their rulers especially) were always the good guys and justified in whatever they have done to the defeated (and to their subjects too).
My point is that the morals of sane adult human beings is proven by their survival through ages. Of course, this could mean that Jew methods should be considered a benchmark for morality. However, their sanity, and now continuity, is questionable. Are they even of our species?
If they weren't they wouldn't be able to reproduce with other humans, and there are so many branches of them, even (officially, not crypto) in China :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaifeng_Jews
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97ZcZL7OQ-Y
They're not superhumans, but how did they manage to rule the world (or at the very least most of it) is a bit unclear to me, even if you try to follow dissidents and their analyses it still seems lacking, now some think they're a front to the real rulers in a semi-hidden, semi-public form, I have difficulties believing that but who knows in this clown world in which we're living.
But yeah the duty of the rulers of a people (and said people too) should be their survival first and foremost, I'd like for that to be possible without being genocidal psychos but that should be their first prerogative. They are good at survival for sure, even if they obviously changed as they spread across the world, their leaders are complete psychos though obviously.
" They are good at survival for sure, even if they obviously changed as they spread across the world, their leaders are complete psychos though obviously. "
https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/9d/8f/cd/9d8fcde9412c4eeb9668dfd09be5e34e.mp4
I'm well aware that the co-funder of Netflix is related to Bernays and Freud, but even Freud is relatively recent history, the question is why were they given so much power even under the Roman Empire (and I mean pre-Christian conversion), why Charlemagne gave them complete control of the economy (a fact barely mentioned on his English Wikipedia page, completely absent of the French page, even though Charlemagne didn't even reign over England).
You could go the Miles Mathis way who explains that the Phoenicians/Israelites/Jews just took control of the world by marrying with the local elites and every person of importance in history is a member of the Tribe (yeah Caesar, Genghis Khan, the whole NSDAP leardship, the freaking Vikings, the list goes on and on...), I mean that's an explanation but I doubt it, I also don't think it's as simple as Paul (Saul) invented Christianity and eventually the Christians prostrated themselves to their "Elder Brothers of the Faith" and just let them run thing, I certainly don't have the answer that's for sure.
As to the Occult, well I've never seen anything in my life that could be explained by some form of occult interference, even if it does indeed exists why would they be the best at that ?
" , the question is why were they given so much power even under the Roman Empire (and I mean pre-Christian conversion) "
The answer is they weren't. Prior to per-Christian Rome , and even after, they were just another of many groups that pissed people off and got punished for it. Similar to how Muslims act when they enter non-Muslim societies.
- https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/b4/e2/b0/b4e2b08baa4c14aa563c9a51ad1fd318.mp4 -
" why Charlemagne gave them complete control of the economy "
This is probably a result of Christianity as it forbade its adherents from lending money at interest but didnt forbid them from borrowing money at interest. This conveniently allowed the small hats to monopolize that field and get filthy rich, leading to other outcomes. Christianity also kept its population uneducated and superstitious severely lowering the pool of people competent in economics. Hence, the small hats stepped in and offered their knowledge and services to naive Charlemagne who because of Christianity probably trusted the silver tongues of the "chosen".
" , even if it does indeed exists why would they be the best at that ? "
This is a complex topic I will just touch on a tiny part . To start they arent the best however through their constructed / corrupted religions forbid most other groups from even entertaining that such things are possible. Even our Science has been intentionally corrupted by the small hats to prevent people from investigating other possibilities of our reality here. Any unapproved research is conspiracy theory, or tin foil hat material.
In Christianity anything outside the allowed is Demons, witchcraft or sinful.
Meanwhile the small hats get fed a diet of supremacism , the Zohar, The Babylonian Talmud, Khabbalh, Sefer Yetzirah , economics, and tribalism.
"...Phoenicians/Israelites/Jews just took control of the world by marrying with the local elites..."
This would be one side of an 'global deep state merchant empire behind the thrones since ancient times' (the seefaring side). The connected land-trade side would be the Silk Road:
Read further down about Jews / 'Achaemenid Corporate Empire' here:
-> https://conjuringthepast.com/dec25.html
" They're not superhumans, but how did they manage to rule the world (or at the very least most of it) is a bit unclear to me, "
Occult assistance.
Speaking of East Asia, the Japanese Tengu :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jszIjHo6aFY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tengu
"Buddhism long held that the Tengu were disruptive demons and harbingers of war."
https://aish.com/exploring-the-jewish-roots-of-japan/
You really couldn't make this up. This is a vaporization wish.
From the "Brussels born" (as the German states on her X account) plagiarist-in-chief:
https://url1.io/tVTxE
INTERNATIONAL SECURITY
Von der Leyen's delirium: "No Russian anthem can cover the sound of justice coming"!
The EU is moving forward with the establishment of a special court to try… Putin
09.05.2025 | 18:40
Indeed, we need to have an aesthetic discussion of the leadup to WWII, not another tedious "moral" one. Hopefully this post will lead to much discussion here.
I was not really buying the anti-black story until you mentioned Kay or Ke or whatever he's calling himself, and then it all fit together. Whitey loves Nazis, but it's really for darkies, and people are starting to catch on. Same with Christianity; it's population center is in Africa now, as it was originally; the whole European "Christendom" thing was a big mistake.
But note that the Nazis were originally Brownshirts; they HQ became known as the Brown House. Seems Rohm bought up surplus Afrika Corps uniforms (Germany no longer having African colonies or even an overseas army) for the SA. So even the Brown came from Africa.
Note that Greek statues were originally brightly painted, the "white marble" look being a result of erosion.
I've always wondered about how in They Live, the "real world" seen through the glasses is black & white. I suppose color works with the brainwashing, or the loss of color is due to the the de-washing process; obviously it's just a budget friendly special effect, but it does seem to fit in with the whole color=false trope, as in the phrase "black and white" to mean gritty truth.
Black and White movies do seem more real, though.
Well the bleaching of antiquity was no doubt part of Plato’s efforts too.
I like how the Rome intro portrayed the pagan Rome as a riot of color.
https://youtu.be/8YDngmnixSc?si=D7m0WHGGqpjUT-wX
That's NLF favorite TV show, far from being mine but I liked it quite a lot, shame they canceled it and rushed the ending. The statues and and temples and whatnot in their "bleached" version look far cooler frankly to me, but I'd imagine that living during those times that would have been depressing, still better than colors everywhere to my taste anyway.
As much as they loathe all things White and fellate all things simian, its a mystery why, these channels, never make any shows about the great cultures of, pre Muslim and European contact, sub-Saharan Africa. I wonder why ;)
Good edit there lol
No mistake shall go unpunished.
Seriously though, this show wasn't bad, at least as far as I remember and a goldfish probably would beat me in that regard :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaka_Zulu_(TV_series)
Not exactly pre-contact of course.
Top 👊 artikel
Too cerebellar for most .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWF5Oy9Q-R4