Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sasha Latypova's avatar

the "strongmen" that Washington puts in charge of countries are never actual strong men. They are puppets acting as tyrants, controlled by the intellectual powerhouses likes Victoria Nuland. Of course they are disposable. In fact disposal and replacement of puppets is a must, otherwise the projection of power from the DC sewer doesn't hold.

Expand full comment
Dr Livci's avatar

This goes a long way in explaining why both Moscow and Washington hate Lukashencko. It goes a long way in explaining why Moscow has dragged its heels so much in recognising the Taliban. It explains why Moscow for so long wanted nothing to do with North Korea. The overall thesis makes sense, why is the US okay with neo nazis in Ukraine right now? Well here you go lol and it has nothing to do with the CIA being based followers of Hitler and Evola. Ukraine still needs the "right wingers" to suppress any sort of alternative Nationalism that doesn't agree with the following statement: "trannies and McDonald's is bad but not having them is even worse because of Russia". When its time for phase 3 and Ukraine doesn't need the death squads anymore they will either be bought off or killed, its their choice.

"Nationalism" bullies and suppresses Nationalism to pave the way for oligarchy with dildos. They did it in the entire FSU. The Baltics did nationalism that was framed as exclusively anti Russia to make way for foreign capital and trannies. Kazakhstan being islamic did the Islamic version which is the same minus the dildos in public for now.

Expecting Russia to follow this model just like the Baltics and Ukraine would be a mistake simply because the Ukraine, Baltics, Kazakhstan etc are normal countries and Russia is an Empire. The US judeo oligarchy will absolutely not sign off on an empire doing any nationalism at all. Russia was expected to go straight into hyper austerity phase 3 immediately with the caveat that Russia would still be an equal imperial partner. At least that is apparently the deal as the Kremlin understood it. Now its apparent that the US and jews are absolutely fine and quite like Komi, Kuban, Ukrainian, Belarussian, Siberian, Dagestani etc nationalism but they will not tolerate Russian nationalism...that is the US wants Russia to be a bunch of easily manageable nations and getting them there requires some petty, servile, piss ant, pro Western in the bad sense Nationalism. And the Kremlin to this fucking day agrees not to allow any Russian Nationalism. Its either Stockholm syndrome, cuckery or treason and most likely a combination of all 3 are at work to various degrees in the people running Russia.

Again, great essay, the best in awhile. It explains a lot and helps me understand the knee jerk distaste ive always had for pro EU/NATO nationalism regardless of the aesthetics. Like I always had a gut revulsion to say "based" Croatian neo Utashe LARPers or Polish Kurvas. My gut was right but I could never truly formulate why I couldn't stand them other than "well America likes them so they cant be good". Of course some might say its than irrational for me to be pro Russia but than anyone who has been following this blog for awhile should know by now that the Kremlin is viewed by Russian Patriots as a bunch of pro Western sell outs and cucks. So i dont see any big contradiction.

Expand full comment
45 more comments...

No posts